Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Prairie Grove

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

Carlson Bier is a leading law firm specializing in representing individuals who have suffered spinal cord injuries. Our talented team of seasoned attorneys are dedicated to relieving the burden on injury victims and their families, reinforcing clients’ rights with assurance and expertise garnered over numerous years in practice serving Illinois state. Our exceptional understanding of the complexities surrounding spinal cord injuries enables us to expertly navigate the legal process, pursue justice diligently, maximize compensation for our clients’ pain and suffering. At Carlson Bier, you delve into commitment unlike any other – we stand staunch till last verdict; giving voice to your suffering before it alleviates rather than mitigates post-incident life hurdles.

While we handle many types of personal injury cases, our focus remains steadfast towards victims of spinal cord damage distinguished by traumatizing after-effects paired up with rigorous medical bills or lost livelihoods—reflective emotional toll matters as much as pecuniary damages at this unyielding prosecution frontier.

We consider every case unique – rich insights earned from harrowing narratives act as beacons steering us towards justifiable triumph on behalf—guiding par excellence through daunting legalese mazes is second nature when championing for those most affected.

If you or someone close has endured a catastrophic injury such as Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) led by another’s negligence or wrongdoing—trust Carlson Bier! We empathically interpret stories worth shedding light upon.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Prairie Grove Illinois

At Carlson Bier, a premier personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we are fiercely committed to representing and advocating for victims of accidents that have resulted in spinal cord injuries. Such incidents significantly alter the victim’s quality of life — sometimes irreparably so — and undeniably warrant skilled legal representation to ensure they receive commensurate compensation.

Spinal cord injuries occur when there’s significant damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves within the surrounding area, leading to profound changes in strength, sensation, bodily function below the point of injury. These instances can be terribly debilitating and often lead to permanent paralysis—quadriplegia (tetraplegia) or paraplegia—that is, impairment in sensory or motor function. Causes may stem from varying catastrophic situations such as car accidents, work-related mishaps, slips and falls among others.

When contemplating the complexity of a spinal injury case, it’s critical first to understand certain key aspects:

• Anatomy: The human spinal cord consists primarily of various nerve cells and bundles responsible for transmitting signals between the brain and different body parts.

• Classification: Medical professionals categorize these injures as either complete (loss of all motor functions below injured area) or incomplete (some residual functioning is left).

• Cost implications: Lifetime care costs following such extensive trauma could range substantially depending upon factors like severity level & age at time of incident.

• Legal recourse: Spinal cord injuries caused due to negligence or reckless behavior fall within purview of civil liability laws. A knowledgeable attorney can assist you in determining your rightful compensation amount.

The aftermaths are not just restricted physically but manifest emotionally & financially too with mounting medical expenses adding further despair. What if you weren’t at fault? Should someone else’s recklessness subject you to unbearable financial hardship on top of physical suffering?

This is where Carlson Bier steps into action serving as advocates for those egregiously wronged—guiding them through the complex labyrinth that is medical liability. Our dedicated team of experienced personal injury attorneys understand Illinois law inside-out and are committed to helping clients navigate the convoluted legal process with utmost strategic dexterity & precision.

What makes Carlson Bier stand out:

• Vast Expertise: Decades of combined experience in handling countless such cases.

• Aggressive Negotiation: Tireless efforts towards securing maximum compensation for our clients.

• No Reservation Consultation: Get a free, no-obligation initial consultation session where our attorneys will explain all possible scenarios, help you understand your rights and potential worth of a lawsuit

• Continued Support: Our service extends beyond our offices; we ensure thorough coordination with associated healthcare providers, insurance companies & other authorities involved bringing you peace during stressful times.

All these factors contribute towards our successful track record over years. At this juncture one might wonder about cost implications–fair enough. This is why we operate on a contingency basis only; simply put, unless we secure some form of monetary compensation for you, there won’t be any charge for our services whatsoever.

Ultimately, the prospect of engaging in a protracted legal battle may feel daunting; it doesn’t have to be though. Let us shoulder that burden so you can focus on what truly matters – healing and recovery. We promise commitment to your cause till last breath because at heart, Carlson Bier family believes in justice above all else – justice served swift & precise for those wronged unjustly.

If you or someone you know has suffered from an accident resulting in spinal cord injuries due to someone else’s negligence, don’t hesitate to click on the button below. Find out how much your case could potentially be worth and let us provide support during this trying time—after all, you deserve nothing but the best when it comes to restitution for injustices done upon you.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Prairie Grove Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Prairie Grove

Areas of Practice in Prairie Grove

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Dedicated to legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Giving professional legal advice for victims of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Physician Negligence

Delivering expert legal services for persons affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Accountability

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, supplying specialist legal help to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Misconduct

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Stumble Incidents

Skilled in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking recovery for their losses.

Neonatal Damages

Providing legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Incidents: Committed to supporting individuals of car accidents secure appropriate recompense for wounds and harm.

Bike Accidents

Expert in providing legal advice for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Truck Collision

Ensuring experienced legal services for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for hurts.

Construction Site Incidents

Committed to defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Brain Harms

Dedicated to ensuring dedicated legal services for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Harms

Proficient in tackling cases for victims who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Focused on legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unjust Death

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and skilled legal services to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Harm

Focused on defending clients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal support to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer