FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Prestbury

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering a spinal cord injury can irrevocably alter your life, often leaving overwhelming medical bills, extensive recovery periods, and the potential of enduring physical hardships. Navigating these challenges calls for expert legal guidance; that’s where Carlson Bier steps in. Our seasoned attorneys possess an exceptional know-how in handling spinal cord injuries cases with unwavering dedication and grit. We’ve championed countless clients towards obtaining the compensation they deserve to support their long-term needs post-injury. As personal injury lawyers specializing in spinal cord injuries claims in Illinois, we are keenly aware of the complex nuances involved when proving negligence or fault in such scenarios. Your settlement claim isn’t just about reimbursing costs—it is about justice served and accountability acknowledged through robust representation by committed professionals like us at Carlson Bier.We vow to strive relentlessly for your rights—never daunted by opposing counsels or large insurance firms.Our track record reflects our expertise: helping individuals overcome an unfortunate circumstance by providing valuable advice and assertive advocacy ensuring securing rightful benefits.Carlson Bier–where empathy meets expertise.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Prestbury Illinois

At Illinois-based Carlson Bier, our personal injury attorneys are known for their deep-rooted knowledge in handling claims related to a wide array of injuries. One area where our legal prowess particularly comes to the fore is spinal cord injuries. Our team of dedicated attorneys stands with those who have had their lives drastically altered due to these severe and often debilitating types of injuries.

As part of our commitment to your understanding, we believe it is crucial to provide all-encompassing information about spinal cord injuries. A majority of these are caused by traumatic events such as falls, sports injuries, car accidents, and instances of violence. This catastrophic injury can result in partial or complete loss of motor control in arms, legs or the entire body – a condition commonly referred to as ‘paralysis’. The extent and location of this paralysis depends greatly on where the spine was injured and the severity of the damage inflicted.

There are two main classifications for spinal cord injuries:

– Complete Injuries: These denote cases where there is an overall loss of function below the level at which injury has occurred.

– Incomplete Injuries: Cases wherein some functionality still exists below the affected level.

As inequitable victims emerged from situations drastically different than when they entered them – forced into lifestyles characterized by countless medical appointments and significant lifestyle modifications – claiming compensation becomes critically important.

Understanding your rights under Illinois’ law can help you navigate this overwhelming process more effectively. For instance, any person suffering from an avoidable spinal cord injury possesses certain entitlements and rights towards compensation for their associated losses including medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, mental anguish, lost wages etc.

Additionally, no one struggling with such life-altering changes should feel alone.Our legal firm believes that education is power; thus we make sure you understand not only all aspects related to your case but also everything about recovery services accessible locally.Some might ponder why one must rely on experts like us for resolving issues regarding spinal cord injuries. The answer to this lies in the complexity and consequence of these cases.

• Expert Legal advice: We bring extensive experience and expertise.

• Objectivity: As emotionally involved as you are with your situation, our objectivity enables you to make sound decisions.

• Representation: We ensure that your rights are protected throughout.

• Litigating skill: When trial is necessary,we possess the tools and strategies required for an effective argument in court.

Representation from a qualified personal injury law firm like Carlson Bier lends credibility to your claim, makes it more likely that any at-fault parties will take accountability for their actions, and ultimately leads to a fair compensation outcome beneficial to your medical recovery efforts.

If you have suffered a spinal cord injury resulting from another person’s negligence or malpractice, seeking justice can be overwhelming. However, recall that knowledge is power; being aware of how spinal cord injuries work can significantly aid in claiming restitution – propelling you onto the road toward recovery by fulfilling financial demands associated with treatments and adjustments required post-injury would not seem as massive an uphill task then.

At Carlson Bier, we go above and beyond traditional attorney-client relationships by providing compassionate counseling every step of the way. Our pursuit always has been making sure we represent our client’s interests towards achieving favorable outcomes through diligent representation.

We invite readers who need assistance learning more about what they could potentially recover following a devastating spinal cord injury or those intrigued by legal recourse options available after such unfathomable ocurrences,to click on the button below. Take this first step towards understanding what value your case might hold under Illinois Law- You do not have to face this ordeal alone; let us help guide you through this uncertain time unto a path most advantageous for your unique circumstances!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Prestbury Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Prestbury

Areas of Practice in Prestbury

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Proficient in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Damages

Supplying specialist legal support for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Medical Incompetence

Ensuring experienced legal representation for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Liability

Managing cases involving problematic products, extending specialist legal support to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Malpractice

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip and Tumble Incidents

Adept in managing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking compensation for their suffering.

Newborn Injuries

Extending legal aid for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Incidents

Incidents: Committed to supporting individuals of car accidents obtain reasonable recompense for damages and damages.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Semi Accident

Providing adept legal advice for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for harms.

Construction Site Mishaps

Dedicated to advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Cerebral Injuries

Expert in delivering expert legal representation for persons suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Injuries

Adept at tackling cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Expert in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Undeserved Loss

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and professional legal services to ensure compensation.

Spine Impairment

Expert in representing persons with paralysis, offering compassionate legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​