...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Burn Injuries in Princeton

Burn Injuries Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Skillful representation following a burn injury requires the dedication of an experienced legal team. At Carlson Bier, we champion burn victims in Princeton and tirelessly advocate for their rights. We understand just how devastating burn injuries can be – let our seasoned attorneys navigate through complexities of legal proceedings on your behalf. With adeptness in handling cases pertaining to severe burns, we tenaciously represent our clients to ensure they receive compensation commensurate with the extreme physical and emotional suffering endured. Our firm commands respect due to its hallmark trait – achieving successful outcomes for our clients relentlessly troubled by burns inflected negligently or deliberately by others. Being cognizant about Illinois laws regarding geographical locations of practice areas, trust us at Carlson Bier as we bring our knowledge, expertise, and determination beyond geographical boundaries right where you need it most-Princeton included; committed solely towards your recovery via impactful legal action that makes a real difference when dealing with profound impact from harmful burn injuries that alter lives forever.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Burn Injuries Lawyers in Princeton Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we advocate for your rights as a personal injury victim, and equip you with adequate knowledge of the nature of certain injuries, crucial in aligning you on suitable steps to take. A common type of personal injury that victims suffer from are burn injuries, hence understanding them is paramount.

Burn injuries can broadly be classified into three categories: first-degree burns affecting only the outer layer of skin or epidermis; second-degree burns extending to the second layer referred to as the dermis; and third-degree burns which involve damage to all layers of skin, including underlying tissues. The severity level determines not only medical treatment administered but also influences the pursuit for compensation.

There exists a myriad of circumstances leading to burn-related injuries. You may sustain such dire injuries in car accidents due to explosions or home incidents involving faulty electrical appliances. Workplaces present another avenue where people often suffer burns particularly if safety guidelines have been shirked by employers or colleagues.

• First-degree Burns: Only affect the outermost layer of skin causing redness and minor inflammation akin to sunburns.

• Second-degree Burns: Penetrating under the outer skin causing painful blisters with possible permanent scarring

• Third-degree Burns: Most severe type inflicting damage deep within multiple skin layers leading to catastrophic consequences often requiring extensive surgery

As professional Personal Injury Lawyers based in Illinois at Carlson Bier Associate Group, our role goes beyond sheer litigation representing burn victims against transgressors responsible for inducing such life-altering afflictions. We work tirelessly alongside healthcare professionals ensuring fair evaluation is done determining your claim’s overall value while seeking requisite justice deserved.

To successfully present a case founded on burn injuries, understanding legal facets associated comes into play primarily due negligence laws outputted by Illinois legislature . As per these stipulations, proof must be presented demonstrating that another party was responsible for causing harm either through their actions or lack thereof (negligence), known as liability. Once liability has been proven, damage assessment for incurred injuries is conducted taking into account medical expenditures, potential earnings lost, mental duress suffered & necessary compensation required.

Following a burn injury experience, seeking immediate medical attention should be prioritized. Nevertheless, due to the complex nature of these cases resulting in prolonged treatment periods often on an outpatient basis, procuring documentation proves vital. Summarily, this assists your legal team in constructing a crystallised argument articulating how you’ve been victimized inclusive of medical expenses and other subsequent costs relayed by the burn accident aftermath.

As per our firm motto: “Injustice For All”, at Carlson Bier Associate Group we vehemently advocate for free initial case reviewing sessions empowering individuals scraping past personal injury curtains such as burn accidents incidentally incurred. Expounding above stated details furthers our clients’ understanding subsequently positioning them better when making informed decisions relating to initiating lawsuits.

Knowing that potential scarring and long-term health ramifications stemming from serious burns are realities that rankle deep within victims and families alike propels us to confront offending parties head-on ensuring maximum obtainable compensation is achieved granting solace notwithstanding tragic life implications left behind by such harrowing experiences.

Personal Injury litigation focussing on burns requires attorneys fully versed with intricate nuances related partly because of unique characteristics etched within varying aspects of this particular type anomaly defense lawyers employ attempting to deflect blame where evidence strongly suggests otherwise . Overcoming these hurdles necessitates equipping clients with beneficial knowledge individually structured feeding directly into achieving desirable legal outcomes without compromising rightful justice course owed.

Beyond championing your rights collectively as Personal Injury Lawyers in Illinois based at Carlson Bier Associate Group we believe in progressive healing processes characterised by affirming individual stories leading up towards realising robust futures grounded upon regained hope even amidst prevailing adversity sprung forth by unwarranted personal tragedies as consequential fallout originating from grossly avoidable accidents tragically endured .

We trust your journey exploring extensive informative tools on burn injury dynamics accords you valuable insight into the legal world where we happily traverse in pursuit of justice for each cherished client. Consequently, understanding your unique case’s potential worth is paramount. We welcome you to unabashedly click on the button below allowing us to serve you even further as we diligently seek recompense reflecting true merits contained within your individual personal injury claim.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Princeton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Burn Accident FAQ​

There are three main types of burn injuries:

  • First-degree burns: These burns affect the outer layer of skin, the epidermis. They cause redness, pain, and swelling.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns affect the epidermis and the dermis, the second layer of skin. They cause redness, pain, swelling, and blistering.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns destroy the epidermis and the dermis, and can also damage the underlying tissues. They cause white, leathery, or charred skin.

Burn injuries can be caused by a variety of factors, including:

  • Heat: This includes flames, hot liquids, steam, and hot objects.
  • Electricity: Electrical burns can be caused by contact with live wires or outlets.
  • Chemicals: Chemical burns can be caused by exposure to acids, alkalis, and other corrosive substances.
  • Radiation: Radiation burns can be caused by exposure to ultraviolet (UV) rays from the sun or to other types of radiation.

The signs and symptoms of a burn injury will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Redness
  • Pain
  • Swelling
  • Blistering
  • Charred skin
  • Difficulty breathing
  • Shock

The treatment options for burn injuries will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common treatment options include:

  • First-degree burns: These burns typically heal on their own within a few days. However, it is important to keep the area clean and moist.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns may need to be treated with medication or surgery.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns typically require surgery and skin grafts.

.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit if your burn injury was caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person or party. A burn injury lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Princeton

Areas of Practice in Princeton

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Scald Burns

Offering skilled legal help for patients of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Misconduct

Offering expert legal advice for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Accountability

Managing cases involving defective products, providing adept legal help to customers affected by defective items.

Senior Malpractice

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble and Stumble Accidents

Specialist in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Injuries

Providing legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Mishaps: Concentrated on assisting victims of car accidents gain fair recompense for wounds and losses.

Bike Incidents

Expert in providing legal services for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Big Rig Mishap

Ensuring expert legal advice for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for losses.

Construction Site Accidents

Engaged in supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cerebral Damages

Focused on offering professional legal assistance for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Damages

Skilled in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Accidents

Dedicated to legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unjust Passing

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Backbone Harm

Focused on advocating for clients with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​