FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Princeton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When navigating the aftermath of a pedestrian accident in Princeton, achieving justice and securing compensation can be challenging. The need for knowledgeable, experienced representation becomes apparent – a role seamlessly fulfilled by Carlson Bier. As your advocates, we ensure your rights are protected while navigating the complex legal landscape surrounding pedestrian accidents. We pride ourselves on our meticulous dedication to each case and weaving comprehensive strategies calibrated to meet individual circumstances. Experience has endowed us with substantial insights into personal injury law; an advantage we leverage relentlessly to aid our clients in acquiring rightful reparation for their pain and suffering, lost wages or medical bills incurred due to others’ negligence on Illinois roads. Why choose Carlson Bier? Because with us you don’t simply get attorneys handling paperwork but relentless champions fighting ardently against injustice suffered by innocent pedestrians as they strive tirelessly for successful results that secure financial stability during these trying times: For justice is blind but at Carlson Bier sees clearly through every gritted challenge.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Princeton Illinois

Established in the heart of Illinois, Carlson Bier embodies dedication and professionalism when handling personal injury claims, specializing in pedestrian accidents. If you or a loved one has suffered injuries due to such an accident, it’s essential to seek legal counsel promptly. We understand that navigating through insurance negotiations and court procedures can be overwhelming during this difficult time, which is why our dedicated team positions swift action and comprehensive assistance as top priorities.

A pedestrian accident occurs when someone walking or running is hit by a vehicle. Whether on sidewalks, crosswalks or parking areas, these unfortunate incidents cause immense physical suffering and often make victims bear the burden of steep medical bills and loss of income due to incapacitation. Additionally, severe emotional distress is common among survivors who need thorough guidance from competent attorneys like our team at Carlson Bier.

Protecting your rights requires understanding key factors relating to pedestrian accident claims:

• Proof of Negligence: This means demonstrating that another party was reckless or careless, leading to your injuries. Key sources of evidence include security camera footage, eyewitness accounts, police reports outlining relevant incidents such as distracted driving.

• Extent of Injuries: Promptly document all medical treatment needed post-accident. A detailed medical record strengthens your compensation claim for hospital expenses, therapy sessions along with accounting for pain and suffering endured.

• Impact on Life Quality: Document how the incident has disrupted day-to-day life routines – inability to work affecting income streams can entail rightful recovery fees within settlement agreements.

At Carlson Bier we use strategic interactions with opposing parties during tasteful negotiations without losing sight of ethical client representation principles ensuring efforts are optimized towards achieving fair compensation packages for affected victims.

Pedestrian laws differ by state; therefore familiarizing yourself with local regulations ensures effective reactions in case accidents occur. For instance – in Illinois should pedestrians walk facing traffic alongside roadways where no sidewalks exist? Yes – it’s not just safe but also state statute required. Cars must stop and yield for pedestrians at all crosswalks – failing to do so is considered negligence in the eyes of Illinois laws.

Importantly, be mindful that insurance companies approach settlement negotiation strategically; they aim to reduce liabilities via limited payouts. Hence having a dedicated personal injury attorney from Carlson Bier safeguarding your interests and rights can fortify strategic decisions during complex legal processes.

Our firm focuses on asserting clients’ best interests while empathetically acknowledging traumatic experiences suffered. With years of experience dealing with pedestrian accident claims across Illinois, we have developed the acumen needed to skillfully negotiate or fiercely litigate as necessitated by each case’s unique circumstances.

At Carlson Bier, transparency is deep-seated in our values system – potential clients can access an initial consultation free of charge. Amid these sessions, we freely share our insights regarding your case, actions required and how it aligns with what differentiates us – exemplary client service reflected upon successful cases resulting in justified compensation sums awarded due to effective legal strategies employed and holistic servicing extended towards beloved community members.

If you want expert guidance for your pedestrian accident claim rest assured knowing our experienced lawyers are equipped thoroughly. We believe every injured person deserves quality representation enabling just compensation for suffering endured unfairly.

We invite you to discover the value of working with Carlson Bier law firm champions – click on the button below to find out how much your case is worth without any further obligation. Your peace of mind after a devastating accident remains our unfaltering mission.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Princeton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Princeton

Areas of Practice in Princeton

Bike Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Flame Damages

Extending adept legal advice for victims of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Healthcare Negligence

Providing experienced legal advice for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Liability

Managing cases involving problematic products, offering adept legal guidance to clients affected by defective items.

Senior Neglect

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Slip Mishaps

Expert in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking compensation for their losses.

Infant Wounds

Delivering legal help for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Mishaps: Dedicated to aiding patients of car accidents gain just remuneration for harms and damages.

Motorcycle Crashes

Focused on providing legal services for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Semi Mishap

Delivering adept legal assistance for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for damages.

Construction Site Mishaps

Engaged in defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Neurological Traumas

Expert in delivering professional legal advice for clients suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Specialized in tackling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Specializing in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Wrongful Loss

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and experienced legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spine Harm

Focused on advocating for victims with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​