...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Princeton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has sustained spinal cord injuries due to negligence in Princeton, the experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier are ready to enforce your rights and secure maximum compensation. Our team has an impressive track record with years of extensive experience managing spinal cord injury cases, and unparalleled dedication in fighting for justice on behalf of our clients. With deep legal knowledge combined with unwavering commitment, we offer quality representation that often leads to favorable outcomes. We listen attentively to each case’s unique details and craft strategic plans that lead towards successful resolution. In tough times caused by debilitating injuries like these, you deserve nothing less than exceptional advocacy from experts who understand every facet of this complex area of law – that’s what sets Carlson Bier apart as a trusted choice in seeking efficient legal recourse for spinal cord injuries-related lawsuits. Choose competence; choose compassion; choose Carlson Bier for championing your cause rightfully!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Princeton Illinois

Your struggle to achieve justice after grappling with a serious spinal cord injury can be deeply challenging. However, at Carlson Bier, an accomplished personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we not only empathize with your plight but also possess the expertise and dedication to guide you every step of the way.

Firstly, educating yourself about spinal cord injuries is essential in comprehending its implications. A spinal cord injury often occurs when there’s damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves that lie at the end of this critical system. It may result in loss or changes in sensation, strength and function below the level of injury — potentially causing life-long changes physically, emotionally and socially.

• The severity of symptoms can range from pain or numbness to paralysis.

• Sometimes it could lead to secondary medical issues like respiratory problems.

• Wheelchair dependency is a pervasive consequence observed globally.

In fact, according to the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, as many as 450 thousand individuals live with such injuries in their daily lives within our country alone. At Carlson Bier, we recognize each of these indomitable struggles and wholeheartedly commit ourselves towards facilitating justice for victims of such devastating accidents.

However legal jargon and complex processes might make obtaining compensation for your ordeal seem tough. Therefore let us decode some key aspects:

1) Timeliness: Within Illinois personal injury cases hold a two-year statute-of-limitations from discovery date—meaning getting appropriate claim settlements requires prompt action.

2) Proving Negligence: Demonstrating another party’s fault directly connects to your compensation—the more efficient proof provided would increase chances of adequate settlement.

4) Damage Assessment: The degree of physical suffering mental trauma lost wages future medical costs—all significantly impact final claim value

As personal injury specialists based out of Illinois; Carlson Bier excels in navigating this complicated landscape towards your deserved outcome. Acknowledging that no monetary sum completely compensates severe spinal cord injuries or their profound impacts, our firm still doggedly pursues every ounce of justice owed to you—whether it’s from insurance companies’ arrayed against you, or corporations trying to dodge liability. We scrutinize every detail with an unyielding commitment towards prevailing over those who’ve wronged you.

Importantly, we are zealous advocates for full compensation that considers all damages: present and future financial loss, life-care necessities, medical costs among other broader considerations. A spinal cord injury significantly alters your course of life and therefore we believe the weight of securing adequate compensation carries considerable relief both today and in the coming years.

Our purpose stretches beyond valuable legal proficiency; Carlson Bier cherishes deep client connections manifested through empathy support understanding. Our clients aren’t mere ‘cases,’ they’re individuals grappling tremendous adversity—from which emerges invaluable relationships binding us in shared experience journey growth.

Remember you’re not alone—we pledge persistence perseverance quality service throughout this challenging period as a crucial cornerstone of our partnership with you.

In remaining faithful to upholding strict adherence standards including Illinois advertising laws please refrain from associating our credible practice exclusively within Princeton area—Carlson Bier extends capable professional assistance statewide providing peace mind wherever clients may reside within Illinois boundaries.

Finally, it’s time to take the first step towards alleviating your distress – evaluating your case amidst complexities. Click on the button below – realize where stand legally financially thereby understanding potential path recovery. Discover what your case might be worth – because at Carlson Bier, every bit of justice counts!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Princeton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Princeton

Areas of Practice in Princeton

Bicycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or perilous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Providing expert legal help for patients of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Clinical Negligence

Providing professional legal support for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Liability

Taking on cases involving defective products, providing adept legal help to consumers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Neglect

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Stumble Mishaps

Adept in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking redress for their injuries.

Childbirth Traumas

Supplying legal assistance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Crashes

Crashes: Committed to aiding individuals of car accidents get equitable payout for harms and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Specializing in providing representation for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Trucking Incident

Extending professional legal advice for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for losses.

Building Accidents

Concentrated on supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Cerebral Injuries

Specializing in providing specialized legal assistance for victims suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Wounds

Adept at handling cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Expert in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Wrongful Death

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and skilled legal support to ensure compensation.

Backbone Damage

Expert in supporting victims with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​