...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in Princeville

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

For the residents of Princeville, experiencing a bicycle accident can be unanticipated and life-threatening. In such an emergency, it is vital to seek legal action for your personal injury claim with Carlson Bier – your top choice at facilitation. As leading experts in Bicycle Accidents law in Illinois, we bring years of experience geared specifically towards handling these claims. With our comprehensive understanding of bicycle laws and keen commitment to securing what you are owed fairly, we have rightfully earned our distinction among cyclists facing similar challenges. Our approach centers around meticulous investigations and aggressive representation that ultimately leads to rightful justice – because every cyclist’s safety counts! Trusting Carlson Bier means you choose unparalleled competence backed by proven results in acquiring maximum compensation for victims involved in bike accidents across the state; all designed within ethical boundaries set by local legal regulations. Your search ends here: make the first step towards settlement after a traumatic encounter with Carlson Bier – your optimal resource working tirelessly behind those cycling wheels where most crucially needed.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Princeville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law, particularly concerning bicycle accidents in Illinois. As experienced professionals within this field, it is our wish to elucidate the complex nature of bicycle accidents and provide clarity for those affected by such unfortunate circumstances. While every case remains unique in its details and outcomes, we strive to help you thoroughly comprehend all facets involved.

The state of Illinois sees a considerable number of bicycle accidents each year resulting largely from negligence or careless behavior of motorists. When we speak about negligence in this context, it typically refers to instances where an individual fails to act with the level of care that a reasonably prudent person would have exercised under similar circumstances. Some possible manifestations can be:

– Distracted driving through activities like texting

– Turning right across a cyclist’s path without performing adequate checks

– Failure to yield at intersections

– Disregarding traffic lights or signs

As any reputable personal injury attorney will attest, proving negligence forms an integral part of a successful lawsuit or claim. It requires demonstrating three core components:

– The defendant owed a duty of care

– This duty was breached either by action or lack thereof

– This breach caused injury and suffering

In most cases involving cyclists, these three factors are critical towards establishing fault and subsequently the compensation valuation.

Talking about exact compensation figures can open discussions on many fronts; including personal damages such as pain and suffering as well as economic damages like loss of income due to treatments or recovery periods. Further intricacies related to insurance claims processes only add further layers for consideration.

One concept worth understanding pertains specifically to comparative negligence laws applicable in Illinois. In essence, your own conduct leading up to the accident impacts how much compensation gets awarded – if you’re seen as partially responsible for causing the incident then you may see reductions aligned with your portion responsibility.

With bicycling becoming an increasingly popular mode of transport owing largely due its environmental friendliness coupled with health benefits; society must propagate awareness of road safety for cyclists. This not only reduces potential accidents but also helps in establishing a respect among all individuals sharing the transit space.

Turning the lens towards Illinois and its regulations, understanding local laws concerning cycling proves essential for cases within our jurisdiction. Local ordinance can vary; however, as per state law:

– Cyclists carry similar responsibilities to motor vehicle operators

– Bicycles qualify as vehicles on Illinois roads

– Every bicyclist shall obey applicable traffic control devices

Wrapping up our discourse on bicycle accidents, we turn to ways Carlson Bier might be able to help you navigate such incidents. Through an unparalleled level of commitment on all fronts – whether it’s assembling proof elements, negotiating with insurance companies or arguing your case before a jury – we go above and beyond towards securing justice for our clients.

Navigating through complex legal processes while dealing with physical traumas related with an accident is never easy. At Carlson Bier, it is more than a job – it’s about being there for people when they need us most. We provide expert counsel based upon years practicing personal injury law, ensuring that your litigation process remains transparent every step along the way.

Considering filing a claim following a bike accident? The professional team at Carlson Bier invites you to shed light onto your unique situation by simply clicking the button below. Let us help evaluate how much your case might be potentially worth and chart out a distinct path forward aligned with achieving justice. Don’t wait – start today.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Princeville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Princeville

Areas of Practice in Princeville

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Specializing in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Offering expert legal advice for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Physician Misconduct

Providing specialist legal support for clients affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Obligation

Managing cases involving problematic products, offering specialist legal guidance to customers affected by harmful products.

Elder Malpractice

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Slip Occurrences

Skilled in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to persons seeking justice for their injuries.

Childbirth Injuries

Extending legal help for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Collisions: Concentrated on assisting individuals of car accidents secure appropriate payout for harms and harm.

Scooter Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal advice for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Trucking Mishap

Extending expert legal advice for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just claims for damages.

Building Site Collisions

Focused on defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Impairments

Committed to ensuring dedicated legal support for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Wounds

Specialized in managing cases for people who have suffered harms from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Committed to legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Unfair Death

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and professional legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Backbone Trauma

Expert in supporting clients with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​