Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Princeville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Carlson Bier is a highly regarded personal injury law firm that holds a dominant position in handling pedestrian accident cases within Illinois. Renowned for their dedication to justice, they are rightfully recognized as legal champions who remarkably turn the tide in favor of clients affected by pedestrian accidents. Their profound experience and comprehensive knowledge about Illinois state laws equip them with the capacity to investigate these complex incidents thoroughly, diligently representing victims involved in devastating accidents. Every client dealing with Carlson Bier receives personalized attention and care—an assurance unique to our offering, reflecting our commitment towards seeking maximum compensation allowed under law. Even though we extend our services throughout Illinois—with unmatched expertise from attorneys—that doesn’t sever ties with specific local regions like Princeville; rather, it strengthens it. Our unyielding commitment lies not only within courtrooms but also understanding regional characteristics influencing each case’s circumstances so we can fully advocate your rights—a testament to why you should trust us when you need exemplary representation against pedestrian-related investigations or insurance claims.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Princeville Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted source for resolving pedestrian accident legal matters. Our dedicated team of personal injury attorneys is committed to offering the highest quality of representation for individuals who have sustained injuries in pedestrian accidents across Illinois. At our law firm, we understand how traumatizing a pedestrian accident can be and our goal is not just about winning cases but also about ensuring that you fully understand every step of your case.

Pedestrian accidents are often severe—a matter that affects both the victim’s physical wellbeing and psychological health. It’s important that victims have access to experienced legal counsel who can advocate on their behalf throughout this difficult time. The primary reasons for such unfortunate incidents include driver negligence, lack of visible crosswalks or adequate signage, intoxicated driving, speeding, and distraction due to mobile devices.

Understanding more about laws governing pedestrian rights goes a long way in assessing compensation entitlement:

• Pedestrians usually have the right of way in marked or unmarked crosswalks.

• Drivers should stop at red lights before making turns.

• In school zones or near parks; drivers must yield regardless if there are no signals or signs.

• Drivers involved in an accident with a pedestrian are required by law to stay at the scene until authorities arrive.

The aftermath of a pedestrian collision may result in costly medical bills, loss of income, pain and suffering as well as mental anguish– all these warrant proper compensation under Illinois law. If you’ve been injured as a result of someone else’s negligence while walking through town or crossing a street it’s vital you fully comprehend your rights.

When navigating what actions to take following an incident like this one has occurred it becomes essential consulting with professionals steeped within the sector – specifically our experienced personal injury lawyers here at Carlson Bier: every client facing such hardship deserves nothing less than expert advice from those wholly immersed within this field.

Our focus at Carlson Bier isn’t merely centered around garnering superior outcomes – we’re equally invested ensuring that our clients comprehend complexities seemingly incomprehensible when first faced with them. We will assist you in understanding the details of personal injury law, providing step-by-step guidance throughout your legal journey.

It’s challenging to determine an exact amount of compensation due since each accident is unique and involves different circumstances. Variables considered include extent of physical harm, psychological impact, lost income or diminished earning ability, authoritative statements from medical practitioners regarding severity and permanence of sustained injuries.

At Carlson Bier we diligently investigate aspects both apparent and hidden within a pedestrian accident context to ensure no stone remains unturned: these vital details are instrumental for culminating a successful claim. As leading personal injury lawyers in Illinois, we work tirelessly to let victims garner maximum compensation by justly representing their interests – be assured that if you choose us your case won’t rest until a satisfactory resolution has been arrived at, not only financially but also reassuring victims about taking decisive strides towards restoration post-trauma.

To learn more about your rights as a pedestrian involved in an accident or how Carlson Bier can help achieve justice for you, explore the options available below. It’s time to take control of the narrative surrounding such life-altering events… Discover today what far-reaching implications this might have on understanding the worth associated with your case; click the button below now!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Princeville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Princeville

Areas of Practice in Princeville

Bicycle Collisions

Specializing in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Providing adept legal support for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Hospital Negligence

Offering professional legal assistance for clients affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Accountability

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, supplying professional legal assistance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Senior Neglect

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble and Slip Incidents

Specialist in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking recovery for their injuries.

Neonatal Damages

Supplying legal guidance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Accidents: Concentrated on aiding victims of car accidents get equitable compensation for injuries and losses.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Committed to providing representation for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Semi Crash

Delivering adept legal support for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for injuries.

Construction Mishaps

Committed to representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Cerebral Harms

Expert in delivering dedicated legal advice for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Traumas

Skilled in handling cases for persons who have suffered harms from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Committed to legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Death

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and experienced legal support to ensure redress.

Spine Trauma

Committed to supporting persons with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer