FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Personal Injury Attorney in Princeville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When a personal injury event strikes, the legal web can seem overwhelming. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in. As an experienced Personal Injury attorney group based in Illinois, our expertise blankets complex cases from product liability to vehicular accidents or work-related incidents. We strive to ensure justice for residents of the Prairie State, including Princeville, by relentlessly pursuing compensation claims and providing expert representation tailored to every unique case. Our achievement record speaks volumes; justifying countless clients’ trust for delivering robust solutions over the years is a testament to our skill and commitment beyond borders. With unmatched dedication towards ensuring fair restitution through meticulous procedures abiding state laws while championing personal rights – your confidence is well placed with Carlson Bier as your choice of counsel for Personal Injury matters within Illinois boundaries and even extending down to Princeville community citizens who are shopping around for top-tier litigation support that assures results.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Princeville Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, where we understand the challenges faced after sustaining a personal injury. We see you as more than just another client; we see you as an individual in need of unparalleled legal support during a significant turning point.

Personal Injury law is centered around holding those responsible for causing harm accountable for their actions. Personal injuries often occur due to negligence or intentional acts by others that can lead to severe physical and emotional harm. The sector encompasses various types of cases such as car accidents, slip and fall incidents, product liability issues, medical malpractice, and worker’s compensation cases among others.

• Key Consideration 1: Every case is unique – Just as no two people are alike, neither are any two personal injury cases. Each possesses its own defining characteristics dependent on the specifics surrounding the incident.

• Key Consideration 2: Compensation – This can be sought for medical bills incurred following the accident, lost wages due to time off work, pain and suffering experienced throughout recovery periods.

• Key Consideration 3: Statutes of Limitations – There are specific timelines within which you must file your claim for it to be considered valid. Thus prompt action is crucial when considering a lawsuit.

At Carlson Bier protecting your interests is our prime directive. Our attorneys invest exceptional skill and care into gathering all pertinent details about your case thereby building a firmly grounded argument with one end-goal—securing justified compensation for your loss and distress.

We leverage extensive knowledge of Illinois laws on personal injury safeguards plaintiff rights in relation to comparative fault stipulations- if you were partially at fault for your injuries your recoverable damages may still be applicable but adjusted proportional to the degree of fault assigned to each party involved.

Furthermore, striving towards timely settlements does not warrant compromising hard-fought rightful claims acting always under our fundamental principle-fast is good but fair is essential!

Giving voice to victims creates ripples reaching far beyond their individual lives-helping make across-the-board societal changes that reinforce public responsibility to the principality of common good. Your victory in obtaining compensation serves as a potent deterrence stimulating an inclusive cultural shift towards liability mindset and increased safety measures.

Navigating personal Injury law places tremendous emotional and physical strain on those suffering from injuries; having experienced representation by your side is paramount. The strength decree of Carlson Bier emanates from our fusion individualized customer attention with proficient knowledgeability yielding optimum outcomes for our clients.

Before initiating legal action, take this first step: Get educated! Understand Personal injury law intricacies to make informed decisions. At Carlson Bier, we consider client education cornerstone to building successful collaborations driving maximum case success rates.

Picture yourself accomplishing ideal settlements commensurate with endured sufferings courtesy of a well-planned strategic legal partnership, strengthened by unwavering Carlson Bier attorney dedication bestowed upon your cause. Trust in us—your case shall benefit indescribably from specialized tailor-made strategies primed towards maximizing recuperation impacts thus renewing life’s joy once lost due to unfortunate incidents!

So why wait? Begin this important journey now. Click the button below to learn the potential worth of your case and bring you one-step closer towards claiming what’s rightfully yours back—the pride integrity leading a normal day-to-day existence living fearlessly confidently, encircled in familial warmth away from distress…

A victorious tomorrow waits—for YOU!

Carlson Bier does not currently possess physical offices located within Princeville respects applicable state regulations necessitating physical presence prerequisites for advertising within city jurisdictions.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Princeville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Princeville

Areas of Practice in Princeville

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Expert in legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Offering professional legal support for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Physician Incompetence

Ensuring professional legal support for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Fault

Managing cases involving problematic products, extending expert legal support to victims affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Neglect

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Slip Mishaps

Specialist in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking compensation for their injuries.

Newborn Damages

Extending legal guidance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Crashes

Collisions: Committed to guiding victims of car accidents obtain appropriate recompense for injuries and impairment.

Motorbike Collisions

Committed to providing legal advice for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Semi Collision

Ensuring specialist legal support for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for losses.

Building Accidents

Concentrated on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Head Damages

Focused on extending professional legal support for patients suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Injuries

Specialized in handling cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Collisions

Dedicated to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unjust Loss

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and adept legal guidance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Damage

Expert in assisting individuals with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​