...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Rankin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with dog bite injuries in Rankin, Carlson Bier is the law firm to turn to. Pursuing justice in such cases requires a sophisticated understanding of personal injury laws – an expertise that we proudly possess at Carlson Bier. Our team of seasoned attorneys are well-versed with the intricacies associated with Illinois statutes relating to dog bites and animal attacks; their experience propels our successful track record. At Carlson Bier, we don’t just offer legal representation: We commit to serving as your devoted advocates, guiding you through every step towards obtaining rightful compensation for medical bills, trauma, or lost wages resulting from a canine attack. Apart from our deep insight into Illinois’ Personal Injury Law provisions on dog bite incidents (510 ILCS 5/16), what further distinguishes us is our client-centered approach: Empathy fuels our pursuit of justice at Carlson Bier because we understand how deeply distressing this period can be for victims – emotionally and physically. Choose reliability and excellence; let your search for Dog Bite Injuries counsel end at Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Rankin Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that dog-related injuries can be traumatic and distressing, affecting one’s livelihood as well as their emotional state. Our aim as a respected personal injury attorney group is not only to provide expert legal guidance but also comprehensive support in the aftermath of your dog bite ordeal.

Dog bites are often unforeseeable occurrences with potentially significant consequences. These injuries can range from minor cuts and bruises to severe lacerations or even life-threatening infections such as rabies. Perhaps the most alarming fact is anyone regardless of age or health condition may fall victim to such an unfortunate event. Children and elderly individuals, though more vulnerable than others, are not the exclusive demographic afflicted by this kind of harm.

If you are bitten by a pooch belonging to somebody else, there could be grounds for claiming compensation. Illinois maintains strict liability laws for these incidents – meaning the owner of an aggressive dog cannot break away from responsibility just because they had no knowledge about their pet’s destructive behavior beforehand.

Here are some crucial aspects covered under the law:

• The dog must have attacked without provocation

• The person must have been behaving peaceably at the time

• The attack should take place on public property or while legally present on private premises

There is also no ‘one bite rule’ prevalent in our state – owners cannot argue innocence because it was their pet’s first act of violence.

Our dedicated team at Carlson Bier works tirelessly to navigate through these complex regulations to fight for your rightful claim whether it includes medical costs (immediate or longer-term any therapy needed), lost income due to inability to work or psychological counseling expenditure. We understand that monetary restitution doesn’t eliminate suffering; however it can surely reduce stress concerning how bills will get paid during recuperation period after experiencing a terrifying incident.

Moreover, having us by your side means you’ll always get accurate advice tailored uniquely for your situation considering all factors like severity of injuries suffered (both physical and psychological), potential future medical expenses, any loss of earnings capability etc. We pride ourselves on offering compassionate service alongside top-grade legal expertise to dog bite victims and their families.

At Carlson Bier, your well-being is our foremost concern. We strive for the maximum compensation you deserve to help rebuild your life post-incident. Through careful review of all relevant facts, diligent paperwork handling, and persuasive negotiation with defendants or insurers – we aim at securing a favorable resolution in shortest possible time frame while respecting the emotional burden upon our clients during such trying times.

In the midst of striving to recover from injuries, contemplating over legal ramifications can feel overwhelming. After a dog bite incident particularly when owner refuses responsibility it becomes crucial to act swiftly consulting an experienced personal injury attorney like us who specialize in Illinois’ strict liability law for obtaining justice.

You may naturally wonder how much your case might be worth. That’s something our team takes into serious consideration carefully evaluating every detail related to injuries suffered along with other key factors revolving around victim’s lifestyle that could have been impacted due this heartbreaking event.

So don’t hesitate now! Click below button right away and let’s connect! Get started towards seeking rightful recompense without further delay allowing us resolute professionals at Carlson Bier assist you through whole process staying focused exclusively on WHAT truly matters—you!

With utmost care factoring intricacies associated specific cases, we guarantee optimal support enabling faster recovery alongside best possible outcome ensuring brighter tomorrow soon after undergoing traumatic episode caused by someone else’s beloved pet.

Regardless severity whether minor cuts leading up severe rabies infection each case requires individual attention which is exactly what we provide here at Carlson Bier where ‘justice’ isn’t just another word—it IS our primary interest always has been!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Rankin Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Rankin

Areas of Practice in Rankin

Bike Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Fire Burns

Offering adept legal services for victims of severe burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Ensuring expert legal support for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Obligation

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, offering expert legal help to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble and Stumble Mishaps

Expert in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking recovery for their harm.

Newborn Traumas

Delivering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Collisions: Devoted to guiding patients of car accidents gain reasonable compensation for harms and damages.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Specializing in providing representation for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Semi Accident

Extending professional legal support for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for injuries.

Construction Site Incidents

Committed to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Brain Traumas

Expert in offering specialized legal services for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Injuries

Proficient in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered harms from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Dedicated to legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unjust Death

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and skilled legal support to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Injury

Dedicated to representing persons with vertebral damage, offering expert legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​