...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Rantoul

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re seeking high-quality legal representation regarding Dog Bite Injuries in Rantoul, look no further than Carlson Bier. Our seasoned attorneys are adept in the nuances of such cases and understand the often challenging aftermath victims face. We stand out for our commitment to safeguarding your rights against any negligence leading to dog bite injuries. As a top Illinois-based personal injury firm, we attribute our success to systematic case investigation, meticulous preparation, and unparalleled advocacy skills – all aimed towards achieving justice for each client appearing before us. Hence when it’s about obtaining rightful compensation from your predicament or ensuring that safety laws related to domestic animals are strictly adhered to prevent recurring incidents; rest assured that with Carlson Bier by your side, you have one of Illinois’ most esteemed law groups representing you – showcasing exemplary understanding of Dog Bite Injury litigation landscape while navigating an optimal path forward amidst seemingly complex claim processes peculiar with such situations within the prestigious environs of Rantoul.Illinois based finest lawyers at work!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Rantoul Illinois

As a leader in the field of Personal Injury Law, Carlson Bier compassionate understands that dog bite injuries can have devastating effects on individuals and families. Our dedicated team has accrued expert knowledge in addressing such personal injury cases throughout our vast experience serving Illinois residents.

Dog bites present significant hazards to people across all spheres of life, regardless their age or physical status. Often, these incidents entail more than just physical wounds but also extend to psychological trauma. Victims might suffer from long-lasting fears along with persistent physical discomforts like scarring, nerve damage and in severe scenarios permanent disfigurement.

A plethora of variables come into play when examining the consequences associated and compensations related to dog bite incidents:

• Physical Damage: This includes puncture wounds, lacerations, crush injuries – sometimes requiring corrective surgeries.

• Psychological Trauma: Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety around animals or just outdoors could be an aftermath.

• Financial Impact: Medical treatment costs coupled with work absences thus affecting overall revenue earnings.

• Legal Responsibilities: Dog owners bear certain responsibilities under Illinois laws.

In comprehending such crucial factors involved in a dog bite injury case in Illinois, it becomes absolutely necessary to engage an experienced law firm like Carlson Bier. Our attorneys guide you through every intricate step towards gaining rightful compensation for your predicaments sustained from the incident.

Under the leash laws adopted by many counties within our state, dog owners are obligated to control their pets efficiently thereby eliminating chances of causing harm to others unluckily crossing paths with them. Meanwhile, when dogs are not within enclosures designated for them or leashed properly while out; there exists strong legal ground for imposing liabilities onto the pet owner if biting incidences occur.

The establishment welcomes clients from all regions served by our office locations across Illinois where we provide absolute commitment towards safeguarding victim’s rights forcibly via adept court representation if needed. Remember this is only possible because as professional personal injury lawyers we diligently follow Illinois’ law stipulating that these physical offices attract clientele only from the particular territories they belong to.

To further augment your understanding about our modus operandi and reputation, visit our Client Testimonials page for an authentic reflection of how we’ve served others in similar circumstances capably. We’ve purposefully diversified this content to ensure it appeals to both those with a wealth of experience navigating legal websites as well as those seeking our services for the first time. Our expert team has a razor-sharp focus on communications that are clear, insightful, and easily understood.

Uncompromisingly committed to securing just compensation for victims of dog bite injuries, Carlson Bier believes in ensuring rightful justice is dispensed unimpeded by financial constraints upfront; hence offers free initial consultations laying bare case potentiality based purely on initial information provided verbally or in written form. No commitment is needed at such instances while establishing an appointment for preliminary discussions so clients get transparent exposure beforehand.

At Carlson Bier, you are guaranteed strategic legal expertise combined with compassionate representation that all patrons deserve. Use the adjacent button now to find out what your dog bite injury case could potentially be worth today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Rantoul Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Rantoul

Areas of Practice in Rantoul

Bike Incidents

Specializing in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Offering expert legal assistance for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Clinical Misconduct

Delivering dedicated legal representation for persons affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Fault

Managing cases involving faulty products, providing adept legal guidance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Mistreatment

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Trip & Stumble Occurrences

Expert in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking compensation for their damages.

Birth Harms

Extending legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Mishaps: Committed to helping individuals of car accidents gain just recompense for hurts and damages.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Expert in providing representation for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

18-Wheeler Collision

Ensuring adept legal assistance for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for losses.

Building Accidents

Committed to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cognitive Injuries

Dedicated to offering dedicated legal advice for persons suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Proficient in handling cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Committed to legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Demise

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and adept legal services to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Damage

Focused on defending patients with vertebral damage, offering expert legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​