FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Rantoul

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When unfortunate circumstances lead to spinal cord injuries, the reaction extends beyond the physical. Complex legal consequences can accompany such trauma and finding an adept attorney becomes key. In Illinois, Carlson Bier is a premier firm specializing in personal injury law primarily Spinal Cord Injuries. Our clients’ cases are handled diligently by our seasoned team who understand the medical backdrop of these injuries intimately; knowledge which helps effectively navigate every unique situation that comes our way.

In Rantoul, residents have relied on Carlson Bier for their consistent excellence and proven track record in managing claims related to spinal cord injuries. We take pride in understanding not just legal parameters but also emotional nuances intertwined with these incidents making us not just attorneys but allies to our clientele in this daunting journey through rehabilitation, financial recovery and justice seeking.

Invoke your right promptly with expert representation from Carlson Bier that ensures no wrong goes unanswered – it is crucial when battling cases related to life-altering spinal cord damages.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Rantoul Illinois

Acclaimed for its relentless pursuit of justice, Carlson Bier is a reputable personal injury law firm well-established in the state of Illinois. One crucial area our experienced attorneys specialize in pertains to spinal cord injuries (SCI). These intricate cases undeniably require expert knowledge and finesse — areas where our dedicated team unequivocally excels.

Spinal cord injuries are serious and life-altering occurrences often caused by unexpected accidents, general negligence, or intentional acts of harm. The consequences vary from partial loss of motor function (paraplegia) to complete paralysis (quadriplegia). Nevertheless, each victim may experience symptoms differing greatly in severity and permanency.

When suffering an SCI, understanding its causes can be instrumental in establishing legal liability. Some common causes include:

– Automobile Accidents: Vehicular collisions are one of the leading causes behind spinal cord injuries.

– Workplace Incidents: Hazards abound in certain work environments such as construction sites—often resulting in these severe injuries.

– Falls: Slips and falls particularly among older adults can lead to SCIs.

– Violent Acts: During physical assaults often involving knife or gunshot wounds.

Irrespective of how an SCI occurred, the effects leave a significant impact on victims’ lives, their families included. Reduced mobility or complete incapacitation frequently leads to job loss accompanied by massive medical costs combining treatment fees and ongoing rehab expenses. Moreover, pain and suffering tied to these catastrophic events could exert immense emotional trauma beyond the tangible economic losses.

Armed with extensive expertise on handling SCI cases effectively across Illinois increases advantages during negotiations or court proceedings promisingly vital for securing rightful compensations for clients at Carlson Bier. Besides fighting tenaciously for your rightful financial compensation covering present and future medical expenses including any lost income due to disability caused by your injury; we strive passionately toward holding those responsible accountable ensuring they pay cognizance toward their actions’ devastating repercussions.

When dealing with insurance companies, watchful legal representation becomes particularly crucial. The tendency of insurers to downplay the severity of spinal cord injuries or attributing them inadequately to pre-existing conditions is a well-known tactic aiming towards reducing their liability. This just showcases how navigating legal landscapes linked with SCIs on your own could be potentially misleading and detrimental.

Furthermore, we understand that being overwhelmed by mounting medical bills and financial instability can prompt victims into an early settlement. But accepting compensation before fully understanding the scope of your injury can result in a harsh financial burden later on since it largely underestimates long-term costs associated with SCIs.

At Carlson Bier, our core objective extends beyond securing favorable case outcomes; it’s about serving as your stalwart partner throughout this arduous journey ensuring you gain the comprehensive support required every step of the way—right from expertly handling intricate legal proceedings up till advocating fiercely for your rights during contentious negotiations.

Knowledge stands as your strongest defense thus let’s delve deeper into spinal cord injuries’ complex world together; empowering you boundlessly while reassuringly watching over substantial legal aspects tied to these formidable personal injury cases. Remember, no one should confront such severe adversities alone — captained by compassion and commitment at its heart, Carlson Bier stands ready at helm navigating these daunting waters for you.

Do not hesitate any further; discover peace amidst chaos starting today—it isn’t merely about seeking justice but reclaiming control over YOUR life again post-SCI trauma. Empower yourself by uncovering what you are indeed entitled to—gain accurate insights for determining realistic compensations based upon specific circumstances surrounding your SCI incident right here! Click on the button below and find out exactly how much YOUR case is worth today! A brighter tomorrow awaits—it’s time to seize it relentlessly backed by Carlson Bier—the trusted ally you deserve on this challenging path toward rightful restitution.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Rantoul Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Rantoul

Areas of Practice in Rantoul

Bicycle Accidents

Dedicated to legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Offering expert legal support for patients of severe burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Hospital Negligence

Extending specialist legal advice for patients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering specialist legal guidance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Tumble Injuries

Specialist in handling trip accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking restitution for their injuries.

Neonatal Traumas

Offering legal help for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Crashes: Devoted to guiding sufferers of car accidents receive fair settlement for injuries and harm.

Motorcycle Collisions

Focused on providing representation for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Trucking Incident

Extending specialist legal advice for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for losses.

Construction Incidents

Focused on representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Traumas

Focused on ensuring expert legal support for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Damages

Skilled in handling cases for people who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Undeserved Passing

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and expert legal services to ensure justice.

Vertebral Damage

Expert in representing persons with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​