...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Raymond

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re in Raymond and facing the unfortunate aftermath of a dog bite injury, it’s essential to secure experienced legal representation. Carlson Bier is an esteemed personal injury law firm specializing in Dog Bite Injuries that offers credible assistance during these challenging times. With years of experience serving clients throughout Illinois, our dedicated attorneys are well-versed with the intricacies associated with this unique branch of personal injury law. At Carlson Bier, we understand how traumatic a dog bite incident can be and strive to provide compassionate yet assertive advocacy for victims. We believe in personally guiding each client through their legal journey, offering comprehensive support every step of the way towards achieving justice and fair compensation for your suffering. For professional advice and effective representation on any matters related to dog bite injuries in Raymond – trust none other than Carlson Bier; where we prioritize your right to safety above all else! Don’t negotiate with insurance companies alone; let us fight for you at Carson Bier—the reliable choice when it matters most.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Raymond Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that a dog bite can be much more than just an unpleasant experience; it can lead to serious physical injuries and psychological trauma. Our team of dedicated personal injury lawyers specializes in defending the rights of dog bite victims across Illinois, offering first-class legal support from the initial consultation through to the final resolution.

We are adept at navigating complex litigation processes associated with Dog-Bite Injuries, which are often multifaceted due to contributing factors such as owner negligence, local ordinances, leash laws, or breed-specific legislation. Understanding these complexities is crucial when advocating for compensation that adequately addresses our client’s medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering or emotional distress.

Our firm knowledgeably handles key issues related to Dog Bite Injuries:

– Legal responsibility: Establishing owner’s liability based on their knowledge of their pet’s dangerous tendencies.

– Breed-specific laws: Explaining how they may affect your case if you were bitten by a specific breed considered ‘dangerous.’

– Negligence: Proving whether the owner did not take reasonable precautions to prevent the incident.

With national statistics revealing that 1 in 5 dog bites result in injuries requiring medical attention (per Centers for Disease Control), understanding your legal recourse can make a significant difference for those affected by such unfortunate instances. These implications extend beyond merely medical consultations or treatment costs; they encompass psychological trauma counseling expenses and potential loss of earnings during recovery periods.

Following a dog bite incident, Illinois law permits two years from the date of injury for filing a lawsuit against responsible parties. Therefore acting promptly is advisable after you seek immediate medical assistance post-injury. At Carlson Bier, we expedite this process with thorough investigations capturing all unique elements of each case for requisite strategic planning.

Our approach includes well-crafted professional correspondence with insurance agencies and relentless representation in courtrooms if negotiation processes do not yield desired outcomes. Rest assured knowing we only get paid when you do, and we charge no upfront fees. Our remuneration structure is contingent upon successful case conclusions where our clients obtain well-deserved settlements or court-awarded compensations.

Evidently, engaging professional personal injury legal services with proven expertise on Dog Bite Injuries can uncomplicate the aftermath of such traumas – this is what Carlson Bier delivers consistently across Illinois. However, each case is inherently unique; complexities arise from variations in dog breeds, temperaments, owner behaviors and jurisdictions. Information provided here serves as a broad guide but cannot replace bespoke professional legal advice tailored to individual circumstances.

Thus, we invite you to explore your potential claim’s value by connecting with us online: Click the button below to understand approximately how much your case might be worth based on preliminary details you provide. Be it for medical treatments costs recovery or psychological anguish compensation – finding out can be an essential first step towards justice and closure. At Carlson Bier, bringing ultimate peace of mind to Dog Bite Injury victims within our cherished Illinois community remains at the heart of our unwavering commitment.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Raymond Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Raymond

Areas of Practice in Raymond

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Proficient in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or perilous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Offering skilled legal assistance for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Clinical Carelessness

Offering experienced legal advice for persons affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Fault

Taking on cases involving problematic products, supplying specialist legal help to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble and Tumble Occurrences

Skilled in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking restitution for their losses.

Birth Traumas

Delivering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Crashes: Concentrated on supporting victims of car accidents obtain fair remuneration for harms and damages.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Committed to providing representation for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Truck Collision

Ensuring adept legal assistance for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for losses.

Construction Crashes

Focused on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Brain Harms

Dedicated to ensuring expert legal representation for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Traumas

Proficient in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered damages from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unfair Loss

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and adept legal services to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Injury

Focused on defending victims with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​