FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Raymond

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the aftermath of a spinal cord injury, reliable legal support is invaluable. At Carlson Bier, we have extensive experience advocating for clients who have undergone such life-altering events. Our team understands the unique complexities these injuries bring and are devoted to helping victims secure compensation appropriate to their circumstances. We service substantial parts of Illinois including Raymond residents while strictly abiding by state laws on advertisement location transparency.

Our broad knowledge base ensures accurate interpretation and application of related laws in your favor. We are specialized in Spinal Cord Injuries Law – an expertise that sets us apart from other average law firms.

This intense focus results in thorough investigation and comprehensive representation during each phase of your case ensuring maximum claim recovery for you or loved ones impacted by spinal cord damage stemming from accidents or negligence.

You deserve a firm like Carlson Bier who values professionalism yet embodies compassion; where navigating intricate details becomes less burdensome as our dedicated team takes charge effectively – providing excellent guidance every step along this strenuous journey.

Trust Carlson Bier, because with us your fight turns into ours too!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Raymond Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law with an unwavering commitment to guide our clients towards understanding their rights and attaining justice they deserve. Among the varied personal injury cases we handle, Spinal Cord Injuries often present unique challenges that require expertise borne out of vast experiences. Illinois residents who have suffered spinal cord injuries need steadfast legal representation that not only comprehends the medical complexities involved but also appreciates the profound life-altering impact on both victims and their families.

Spinal Cord Injuries are a severe health situation resulting from vehicle mishaps, bad falls, sports incidents, or instances of violence. These injuries can cause temporary or permanent changes in the spine’s function due to damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves at its end – leading to diminished strength, sensation loss below the affected area, and modified functionality involving bladder control and sexual health.

Essential aspects about Spinal Cord Injuries include:

– The severity varies: While some may experience subtle symptoms such as numbness or tingling sensations in extremities others may undergo complete paralysis.

– Rapid treatment is vital: Immediate attention post-injury can minimize long-term effects; thus it’s crucial that efforts be made swiftly for medical assistance.

– Rehabilitation continues lifelong: Physical therapy and rehabilitation will become integral life elements that equip persons with strategic ways for overcoming daily life challenges arising from such injuries.

At Carlson Bier, our adept attorneys possess extensive knowledge regarding these nuances associated with Spinal Cord Injuries – this depth ensures we consider every possible aspect while resolving your case and working towards ensuring fair compensation. We realize beyond hefty medical bills there’s emotional turmoil which adds up financially through lost wages due to being unable-to-work and coping costs including psychological therapies. Our lawyers tirelessly fight against negligent parties responsible for causing such unwarranted distress helping you secure finanical relief when it matters most.

Moreover, proceedings related to spinal cord injuries encompass more than merely filing a lawsuit. It requires studying medical reports, consulting experts, acquiring informed opinions on realistic life-expectancies post-injury and managing insurance company tactics while keeping you updated about progression through each stage of your case – Carlson Bier excels in all these areas.

Our empathetic approach aids us to work hand in hand with our clients; advocating for their rights while guiding them through these challenging times. Over the years, we’ve secured millions for our clients enabling serious injury victims to find some respite as they navigate their newfound circumstances after sustaining spinal cord injuries.

Located within Illinois but not specified to any particular town or city, we represent Spinal Cord Injury victims throughout the entire state ensuring that justice knows no geographical bounds. Our commitment towards pursuing truth and representing your best interests remains steadfast regardless where you’re based within State lines. As Carlson Bier client, it’s more than just a business relationship – it’s an opportunity for us to lend our voice to your cause and help restore balance back into disrupted lives.

We understand contemplating legal action can be overwhelming especially when confronting a sudden traumatic event like Spinal Cord Injury. Thus, at Carlson Bier we offer free initial consultation whereby you can discuss your case specifics without apprehensions thereby allowing us insight towards determining its worth and subsequent appropriate measures to be undertaken.

Embarking on this journey is indeed daunting but remember you’re not alone- Click on the button below now and allow us at Carlson Bier ensure that justice prevails where spine injury negligence has occurred.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Raymond Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Raymond

Areas of Practice in Raymond

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Proficient in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Damages

Extending specialist legal support for victims of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Providing expert legal support for victims affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Accountability

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering expert legal services to clients affected by harmful products.

Aged Misconduct

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Trip Mishaps

Skilled in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking compensation for their injuries.

Childbirth Harms

Delivering legal assistance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Incidents

Accidents: Focused on aiding victims of car accidents secure reasonable remuneration for hurts and harm.

Scooter Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Truck Accident

Delivering experienced legal representation for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for injuries.

Construction Site Mishaps

Concentrated on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Traumas

Specializing in offering dedicated legal support for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Wounds

Specialized in dealing with cases for people who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Mishaps

Committed to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Fatality

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and adept legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spine Harm

Dedicated to advocating for victims with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​