FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Red Bud

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with dog bite injuries, securing experienced representation is critical. Carlson Bier’s team of trained and dedicated legal professionals holds a significant history in effectively handling such cases throughout Illinois. With meticulous attention given to every detail, they tirelessly advocate for victims’ rights, ensuring maximum compensation from responsible parties. They understand the emotional trauma and financial strain these incidents entail- medical expenses, emotional distress,and potential loss of income. Utilizing their profound personal injury expertise, they consistently navigate through complex legal processes with utmost precision and determination. Vigorously representing clients against insurance companies or negligent parties who fail to take responsibility—they step in when others turn away. Without resorting to aggressive marketing tactics like suggesting an unlawful presence in Red Bud (contrary to local regulations),they let their solid reputation speak by successfully championing a plethora of dog bite injury cases across numerous Illinois jurisdictions—making your search for uncompromising advocacy end here at Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Red Bud Illinois

When faced with the traumatic experience of a dog bite injury, Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm based in Illinois, provides experienced legal representation to get you the compensation you deserve. Every year in America, hundreds of thousands undergo medical treatments for such injuries. Often victims suffer far more than physical pain – emotional distress, lasting trauma and significant financial strain can result from such incidents; during these times it’s ideal to engage reputable professionals like Carlson Bier.

At our law office, we understand the nuances that accompany cases pertaining to dog bite injuries. Numerous factors influence these proceedings, including jurisdiction-specific regulations on pet ownership liability and leash laws which are essential areas where seasoned guidance becomes invaluable. Simone Lehnardt (2021), a celebrated author specializing in US litigation says “A skilled lawyer thus tempers justice with strategic advice.” So if your injury stems from a negligent pet owner not adhering to designated leash laws or demonstrating reckless behavior concerning their animal’s temperament, we will vehemently advocate for you.

We’d also like to draw attention towards some critical aspects surrounding dog bite claims:

• The effect of provocation: If there is solid evidence pointing towards the victim having provoked the animal prior to attack, this can greatly impact how damages are awarded.

• Strict Liability: In states like Illinois where strict liability applies towards pet owners for any harm caused by their animals unless proven provoked.

• Time Limitations: Dog bite claims generally must be filed within two years following the date of injury under statutes of limitations.

Due process takes into account all these intricacies as each claim progresses through what may seem like labyrinthine legal avenues— rest assured our attorneys at Carlson Bier handle them with meticulous expertise.

With rising healthcare and psychological care costs coupled with potential loss of income due to recovery periods after dog bites makes fair reimbursement crucial for victims. Your rights matter too! With us as your legal representatives we strive steadily towards diligently pursuing every course to maximize your claim. Carlson Bier attorneys navigate the complex world of insurance providers, negotiate with toughened defense attorneys, and fervently present your case in court if necessary.

We believe in making this ordeal less challenging for you by taking over all dealings with insurance companies who purposefully shroud their policies with perplexing language to downplay or outright deny just compensations owed to victims. However, it is important to gain a general understanding of dog-bite related laws in Illinois such as the Animal Control Act and local ordinances enforced across its various municipalities, as these govern how culpability is proven and consequently compensation determined for such attacks.

Remain cognizant of few key points about pursuing cases within the context of local ordinances:

• Understanding Local Ordinances: Consult with the team at Carlson Bier since liability can vary based on local pet ownership laws.

• When Government Entities Are Involved: Defensive measures may be sanctioned if an incident involved government employed animals like a police K9.

Remember that each personal injury lawyer at our dependable firm has been trained exhaustively in investigating, researching and effectively strategizing litigation tactics specifically tailored towards dog bite injuries. We understand that each situation is unique hence we respect our client’s individual needs, while remaining committed towards delivering results that are most favorable to them.

Seeking legal support from scrupulous professionals like us ensures not only justice served but also offers peace of mind when dealing with such distressing episodes in life. The aftermath of a dog bite injury shouldn’t have long-lasting negative impacts on any person’s overall quality-of-life!

Take the first positive step forward out of this challenging time – click on the button below today and let Carlson Bier attorneys guide you through claiming back what’s rightfully yours! Uncover how much worth your case holds; because grippling medical bills or wage losses should never add more distress during recovery periods – Trust us at Carlson Bier for assisting you in navigating this taxing time.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Red Bud Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Red Bud

Areas of Practice in Red Bud

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Expert in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Scald Burns

Extending expert legal advice for patients of major burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Physician Malpractice

Ensuring specialist legal services for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Liability

Handling cases involving problematic products, providing expert legal guidance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall and Stumble Accidents

Specialist in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking redress for their suffering.

Neonatal Wounds

Offering legal guidance for households affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Collisions: Committed to supporting individuals of car accidents secure reasonable settlement for hurts and impairment.

Motorcycle Accidents

Committed to providing legal support for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Big Rig Incident

Providing expert legal assistance for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for harms.

Worksite Incidents

Dedicated to advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Brain Injuries

Dedicated to providing specialized legal advice for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Damages

Skilled in managing cases for people who have suffered traumas from dog bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Death

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and experienced legal representation to ensure fairness.

Neural Harm

Focused on supporting patients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​