FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Red Bud

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has suffered a spinal cord injury in Red Bud, Carlson Bier can provide the strong legal representation you deserve. A force within Illinois’ legal field, we diligently guide victims of spinal cord injuries through their complex litigation process. Our attorneys have an impressive track record of substantial settlements and victories for our clients who’ve suffered such life-altering injuries. Harnessing immense knowledge about medical aspects and laws surrounding spinal cord injuries, we ensure your rights are fully protected while pursuing maximum compensation for your pain, suffering and loss. As advocates on your side after catastrophic events like these, think no further than Carlson Bier to bring forward powerful claims ensuing from hard-to-prove causes and long-term impacts that need astute understanding for successful resolution. The challenges post spinal-cord-injury are monumental—let us help ease this course by providing skillful navigation towards recovery – both personal and financial led by unmatched dedication at Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Red Bud Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we dedicate ourselves to protecting the rights of individuals who have suffered spinal cord injuries due to someone else’s negligence. Our personal injury attorney group, based in Illinois, holds a premier reputation for providing top-notch legal representation and exceptional client service.

One of our key areas of expertise lies in understanding and handling cases related to spinal cord injuries. When the spinal cord experiences trauma or injury, it can disrupt communication between your brain and various parts of your body—potentially resulting in paralysis or other forms of disability. This can dramatically alter an individual’s life, invoking significant physical, emotional, as well as financial challenges.

Spinal Cord injuries range from mild transitory effects to severe implications such as:

• Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: Partial damage leaves some sensory or motor function below the affected area.

• Complete Spinal Cord Injury: Total loss of sensation and movement ability below the level of injury.

• Paraplegia: Paralysis from basically waist-level down.

• Tetraplegia (Quadriplegia): Severe paralysis affecting all limbs.

It’s worth noting that these injuries not only bring substantial medical expenses but also require long-term therapy costs, adjustment expenses like mobility equipment or home modifications and wage-loss due to inability or restricted ability to work. The severity and unpredictability surrounding this type of personal injury underscore the need for top-quality legal assistance—an assurance offered with every case handled by Carlson Bier.

Our team acknowledges how critical a component healthcare professionals are when dealing with these debilitating conditions; networking you ahead-of-time with skilled medical providers becomes an integral part of our comprehensive approach towards seeking justice for your misfortunes.

Educating clients is foremost at Carlson Bier — we firmly believe knowledge empowers you during litigation milestones while magnifying healing outcomes too:

• Understand Rights & Obligations: It’s crucial to comprehend resident-state laws concerning timelines (statute limitations) within which a personal injury claim should necessarily be filed.

• Proof of Negligence: Establishing the other party’s negligence caused your spinal injury is pivotal for a successful suit. They might have exhibited distracted driving habits, enacted premise liability issues or even provided substandard medical care.

When you secure our services, we explore all legal avenues relevant to your circumstance. Leveraging our network of professionals including expert witnesses and accident reconstruction specialists, meticulously analysing collected evidence —each aspect gets addressed per an individualized plan devised exclusively to obtain compensation that you rightfully deserve.

At Carlson Bier Associates, we operate on a contingency fee basis; meaning unless we score resolution in your favor—securing for you either settlements out-of-court or winning trial verdicts—we don’t charge any attorney fees! Transparent charges with no upfront costs offer immense peace of mind as we guide you through this complex litigation process.

Trust Carlson Bier’s reputation; reinforced by year-long experiences coupled with proven track records representing spinal cord injury victims’ rights relentlessly across Illinois state jurisdictions. You are not alone during this demanding journey; our top-tier attorneys ardently SEEK JUSTICE while envisioning MAXIMUM COMPENSATION concerning disrupted lives due to such catastrophic injuries.

Click on the button below now! Time surely is essence post-surviving an ordeal involving egregious Spinal Cord Injury. Discover how much your case could be worth under law realms sprung from accountability owed towards devastating losses so unjustifiably incurred—captures immediate priority here at Carlson Bier; committed invariably towards client-centric service excellence within every case-transaction hosted ever.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Red Bud Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Red Bud

Areas of Practice in Red Bud

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Proficient in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Burns

Offering adept legal support for patients of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Hospital Incompetence

Ensuring experienced legal services for clients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Liability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, delivering adept legal help to clients affected by harmful products.

Senior Misconduct

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Trip and Trip Mishaps

Skilled in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking restitution for their damages.

Birth Damages

Supplying legal help for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Accidents

Accidents: Concentrated on supporting victims of car accidents receive reasonable remuneration for harms and destruction.

Bike Crashes

Focused on providing legal assistance for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Semi Accident

Offering expert legal representation for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for damages.

Construction Site Crashes

Committed to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Brain Injuries

Specializing in ensuring professional legal representation for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Wounds

Expertise in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unjust Fatality

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and adept legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Neural Injury

Dedicated to assisting victims with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​