...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Richton Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When a canine attack occurs in Richton Park, securing expert legal assistance is paramount. Victims of such incidents should consider the services provided by Carlson Bier— respected for their steadfast dedication to personal injury law including dog bite cases. The team at Carlson Bier understands the aftermath of an unfortunate encounter with an aggressive dog: physical and emotional trauma, burdensome medical bills, loss of wages due to recovery time — we’re committed to getting you adequate compensation for these hardships. Our attorneys are well-versed in navigating Illinois’ intricate laws pertaining to animal attacks; they use this knowledge to effectively advocate and fight tirelessly on behalf of our clients’ rights. Dedicated and compassionate, Carlson Bier’s record speaks volumes about its proven expertise when it comes down to representing victims of dog bites injuries. Choosing us means choosing reliable representation dedicated wholly towards your welfare and justice—it’s exactly what you can expect from a seasoned Dog Bite Injuries attorney group like ours.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Richton Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law with a dedicated focus on dog bite injuries. Our legal team is well versed in Illinois state laws and regulations surrounding such incidents, providing unparalleled representation to those affected by these unfortunate circumstances.

Dog bites can result in severe physical damage and psychological trauma. They can lead to permanent disfigurement, nerve damage, bacterial infections, and Rabies or Tetanus diseases transmission as well. Apart from the physical pain and damages caused, victims of dog bites may be faced with substantial financial burden stemming from medical bills, therapy costs for psychological trauma, lost wages due to time missed at work during recovery period and much more.

There are specific laws concerning liability when it comes to dog bites. For instance:

• The Illinois Animal Control Act renders owners strictly liable for their pets’ actions.

• This liability covers any injury that might occur as long as the victim was acting peacefully in a place they were legally allowed to be.

• If the animal was provoked into attacking which resulted in an injury, however; the owner may have a defense.

Understanding these intricacies while dealing with physical and emotional tumult could be daunting for anyone not adequately versed with the nuances of personal injury law regarding animal attacks.

This is where our proficiency at Carlson Bier comes into play. Our seasoned attorneys relentlessly advocate for your rights ensuring you get fair compensation commensurate with the damages incurred. We meticulously go through every dimension of your case including medical records examination and actuarial calculations before filing claims hence striving to provide you comprehensive support during this challenging phase.

To better assist you comprehend where your lawsuit stands swiftly after an incident occurred; below we’ve highlighted some critical points that insurance companies consider when evaluating dog bite injury claims:

• The severity of your injuries: This includes both immediate injuries like lacerations or puncture wounds along with potential long-term problems like scarring or permanent disfigurement.

• Past history of the dog: If the canine had a prior history of biting or aggressive behavior, it might affect your claim.

• Monetary losses due to injury: This includes medical bills, psychological therapy costs, lost wages and everyday expenses like transportation to doctor appointments etc.

With decades of experience in handling personal injury cases, we strive to empower our clients with valuable information that can aid them holistically address their situation. As an established law firm in Illinois, Carlson Bier is immensely experienced in dealing with insurance companies and effectively navigating through legal complexities pertaining to dog bite injuries.

By entrusting us with your case, you assign yourself a powerhouse advocate dedicated to help you receive the compensation you deserve for physical injuries as well as emotional distress endured from an incident often neglected but incredibly impactful. We’re here to support you during this challenging time while ensuring your rights are protected amidst these daunting legal processes.

If you or someone close has been a victim of dog bite injury and unsure about where to start or how much your unique case could potentially be worth; we urge you not only act swiftly so counteractive measures can be put together at the earliest but also click on the button below for initial evaluation of your situation without any obligation. Remember, no recovery means no fee at Carlson Bier! Allow us bring our aptitude and passion in aiding those unjustly injured come forth as we strive together towards achieving justice rightfully due.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Richton Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Richton Park

Areas of Practice in Richton Park

Bike Mishaps

Focused on legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Providing skilled legal assistance for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Physician Carelessness

Delivering dedicated legal services for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Accountability

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, supplying skilled legal support to consumers affected by harmful products.

Senior Malpractice

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Trip & Fall Occurrences

Professional in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking restitution for their injuries.

Neonatal Traumas

Providing legal help for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Car Crashes

Accidents: Focused on aiding patients of car accidents obtain appropriate recompense for wounds and losses.

Bike Accidents

Specializing in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Offering adept legal representation for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for injuries.

Building Mishaps

Committed to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Head Impairments

Specializing in ensuring professional legal representation for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in handling cases for persons who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unfair Demise

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and skilled legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Focused on advocating for individuals with paralysis, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​