...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Riverdale

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with medical malpractice dilemmas in Riverdale, Carlson Bier stands up to the challenge. Reputed for their relentless pursuit of justice in complex personal injury cases, they focus on healing your pains by standing beside you at every step of the legal journey. Anchored by an impressively intricate knowledge of Illinois laws and regulations regarding medical malpractice, Carlson Bier’s expert attorneys are well-equipped to represent your interests fervently and professionally. Their unwavering commitment toward integrity ensures that each case is treated uniquely and each client given individual attention — a pledge crafted solidly into their ethos. Trusted across Illiniois, these impressive litigators delve deep in an effort to untangle the threads that bind difficult medical malpractice situations while aiming for optimal outcomes; always striving for relief from liability on behalf of victims wronged through no fault of their own. If steadfast representation defined by seasoned experience matters to you – it might be time to consider reaching out to Carlson Bier––your first line of defense against unjust losses from medical practitioners who have misstepped or failed in providing standard care.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Riverdale Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our personal injury attorneys understand the intricate details of medical malpractice and we are here to offer our services in this complex field. Based in Illinois, we are a distinguished law firm that focuses on providing educational value as much as legal expertise, guiding individuals through a myriad of problems associated with medical malpractice claims.

Medical malpractice is legally defined as an occurrence where a healthcare professional or provider neglects their duty of care to a patient, resulting in harm or injury. This negligence can result from deviations from standard procedures to misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose; wrong medication/dose administered; errors during surgery or childbirth; improper monitoring post-operation and early discharge among other scenarios.

The consequences of such actions –or lack thereof– can be life-altering for the victim. Thus, it’s important that you know your rights and understand what constitutes Medical Malpractice:

– Duty: The basis of any claim hinges on showing how the caregiver/doctor-patient relationship exists. Essentially, was there a responsibility towards your health?

– Deviation/Breach: Can it be proven that said healthcare provider deviated from accepted norms and practices? Would another professional have acted differently under similar circumstances?

– Damages/Injury: It must be shown clearly how the breach resulted in measurable damages. These could range from physical injuries due to improper procedures; emotional trauma rising out of extreme stress; financial burden due to excessive periods off work etc.

– Direct Causation: Lastly, demonstrating how direct actions led to harm suffered by you is critical. Could all events following the negligence be foreseen by reasonable parties involved?

Navigating these nuanced requirements often necessitates expert legal guidance – which is where Carlson Bier steps in. Our experienced team has represented countless clients who experienced medical malpractice at first hand, winning substantial payouts allowing them recovery time without financial worry while holding negligent care providers accountable.

We pride ourselves on making complex legal jargon accessible to anyone, ensuring you understand every step of your litigation journey. Our reputation is built upon knowledge sharing and always keeping your interests at the forefront of all actions.

It’s worth mentioning that medical malpractice laws differ from state to state. In Illinois specifically, cases need be filed within two years of realizing an injury occurred or should have been realized (although not more than four years after said negligence took place). There’s also a cap on non-economic damages like pain, suffering or trauma.

Choosing Carlson Bier means choosing a dedicated partner with intricate knowledge about Illinois-specific rules encompassing medical malpractice. We consider each case as unique and treat it with its due diligence, striving for desired outcomes through detailed research, meticulous preparation and aggressive advocacy in courtrooms if necessary.

However small or large your claim may seem to be; our team stands ready to assist you navigate this complex process offering unique insights based on collective decades of experience practicing law. What’s more important we take pride in providing practical information regarding all aspects involved in settling medical malpractice suits – from briefing you about potential pitfalls ahead to discussing whether going to trial would be judicious.

Are you done bearing the burden caused by someone else’s lack of professional care or attention? Would you like further advice concerning plausible action paths best suited for your specific circumstance? Click on the button below right now for a personalized evaluation of what could potentially be owed to you even without having to go through strenuous courtroom battles. Let us help turn this horrendous experience into an empowering one wherein justice prevails over negligence! Your road towards rightful compensation starts here – begin by gaining understanding about how much your case might actually be worth today.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Riverdale Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Riverdale

Areas of Practice in Riverdale

Bicycle Incidents

Specializing in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Fire Traumas

Offering expert legal support for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Healthcare Misconduct

Extending professional legal representation for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Obligation

Handling cases involving faulty products, delivering specialist legal services to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Neglect

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Stumble Occurrences

Specialist in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking redress for their injuries.

Newborn Injuries

Providing legal support for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Mishaps: Devoted to helping patients of car accidents secure just remuneration for wounds and damages.

Motorbike Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal support for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Incident

Providing expert legal services for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for injuries.

Building Accidents

Committed to assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Cerebral Injuries

Expert in offering professional legal support for clients suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Expertise in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered damages from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Specializing in legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unjust Demise

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and experienced legal services to ensure fairness.

Spine Trauma

Specializing in assisting persons with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​