FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Riverwoods

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or a loved one experience spinal cord injuries, the Carlson Bier team in Illinois stands by your side. As leading experts in this challenging legal arena, we’ve earned our reputation through steadfast representation and total commitment to our clients’ well-being. We understand that such injuries are life-altering and require comprehensive understanding for successful litigation. With an unmatched depth of knowledge regarding spinal cord injury cases – including causes, effects on daily living – Carlson Bier is prepared to go above and beyond for every client’s cause. Our dedicated professionals handle each case with compassion while striving to secure maximum compensation under the laws governing these delicate matters.With their strategic planning methods, they utilize expert witnesses as necessary while ensuring attentive service at each phase of proceedings delivering personalized responsiveness.Our relentless pursuit of justice has made us a trusted ally for many suffering from spinal cord injuries.Finding quality legal representation is crucial following traumatic experiences like these.You need someone who will fight tirelessly for rights, which is what you can expect from a partnership with Carlson Bier.Choose us when seeking excellence in lawyering.Capitalize on the strengths of attorney group versed deeply in Spinal Cord Injuries law.Choose Carlson Bier.When it comes to your predicament,no firm represents better than ours.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Riverwoods Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are your dedicated personal injury attorneys based in Illinois and we have developed this extensive informational resource on Spinal Cord Injuries, aiming to provide readers with profound insights into the subject matter. Grasping the gravity of these injuries can assist you in establishing a deeper understanding when involved in personal injury claims.

A spinal cord injury is an unfortunate yet serious condition that tremendously affects an individual’s life quality. These debilitating injuries often arise from accidents due to another party’s negligence or recklessness. Primarily, there are two types of such injuries; namely ‘Complete Spinal Cord Injuries’ which result in total loss of function below the damage level, and ‘Incomplete Spinal Cord Injuries’ where some functionality remains beneath the affected area.

Key aspects surrounding spinal cord injuries involve:

• The Causes: Accidents involving motorcycles, falls from significant heights, sporting mishaps and violent encounters top the chart as typical causes.

• The Symptoms: While each patient will present unique symptoms depending upon their specific spinal cord injury nature and severity, common signs include numbness or weakening muscles in hands or legs, difficulty walking or maintaining balance coordination etc.

• The Treatment: Though presently a cure for individual cases may not exist yet rehabilitation programs alongside physical therapies tend to yield favourable results.

The prognosis following a spinal cord injury largely depends on its severity and immediate medical attention after occurrence plays a crucial role towards improvement prospects. As any personal injury specialist would confirm – prompt recognition and comprehensive medical intervention for victims is critical towards maximizing their recovery potential. This kind of specialized treatment comes at significant financial costs often falling heavily upon victims’ families who must manage these circumstances whilst dealing with emotional trauma simultaneously.

Understandably facing such adversity isn’t easy hence it becomes absolutely vital knowing your legal rights so you can take appropriate action if someone else’s negligence has caused this predicament. Pursuing litigation against negligent parties could help secure compensation covering incurred medical expenses, loss of earnings, as well as non-economic damages such as pain and distress.

At Carlson Bier, we are deeply committed to supporting our clients through their challenging times and believe in delivering the justice they deserve. Our proven track record speaks volumes about our dedication towards championing for various victims who have endured due to someone else’s fault which remains evident throughout several resolved cases over the years.

In a nutshell:

• Every individual deserves full awareness about their legal entitlement following a spinal cord injury.

• Early counsel and representation from seasoned attorneys can greatly enhance outcomes in personal injury litigation.

• At Carlson Bier, you aren’t just another case; we sincerely empathize with your plight and aim at delivering justice accordingly.

Being well-versed with complexities surrounding spinal cord injuries personal injury law, combined with our relentless pursuit towards safeguarding your interests places us in an advantageous position when fighting tirelessly on behalf during court proceedings or even negotiating settlements outside of courtrooms. Regardless if your recovery journey involves home care or specialized facilities assistance; rest assured knowing that Carlson Bier will leave no stones unturned until every avenue for potential compensation has been thoroughly explored.

Now is the time to take action! Click on the button below to immediately find out how much your case could potentially be worth. Do not delay – your rights and future wellbeing might largely depend upon this pivotal decision. Secure justice now because at Carlson Bier – your voice matters and your peace of mind is our primary concern.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Riverwoods Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Riverwoods

Areas of Practice in Riverwoods

Bicycle Collisions

Focused on legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Burns

Providing expert legal help for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Hospital Malpractice

Providing professional legal assistance for persons affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Responsibility

Taking on cases involving defective products, extending adept legal assistance to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Misconduct

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Trip Accidents

Skilled in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking compensation for their suffering.

Birth Traumas

Supplying legal help for families affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Crashes

Incidents: Concentrated on supporting patients of car accidents get fair remuneration for wounds and losses.

Motorbike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Truck Incident

Providing adept legal support for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for harms.

Building Incidents

Engaged in advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cerebral Damages

Committed to providing professional legal services for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Proficient in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered traumas from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Collisions

Dedicated to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Undeserved Demise

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and expert legal representation to ensure redress.

Backbone Harm

Dedicated to supporting patients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​