FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Roanoke

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or a loved one suffers from dog bite injuries in Roanoke, it is critical to have an experienced legal team behind you. Carlson Bier delivers this expertise as leading personal injury lawyers knowledgeable about Illinois law and dedicated to serving clients effectively irrespective of their geographical location. Specializing in dog bite injuries, we understand the profound effects brought upon by these damaging events—physical pain, emotional distress, and significant medical expenses—and strive relentlessly to secure fair compensation for all harm endured. Our thorough understanding of Illinois’ Dog Bite Statute allows us to meticulously navigate your case’s complexities while working towards obtaining optimal results. By choosing Carlson Bier as your representative, not only are you gaining support from unwavering advocates but also benefitting from our sterling track record which speaks volumes about our competence and dedication. Regardless of the severity or circumstance surrounding your unfortunate experience with dogs within Roanoke’s community; remember: the battle against such trauma shouldn’t be faced alone-let us be your committed partner on this journey toward justice and recuperation.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Roanoke Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the traumatic experience of being a victim of dog bites. These incidents can occur unexpectedly and may leave both physical scars and emotional trauma. Our skilled team of attorneys specializes in personal injury cases, specifically pertaining to dog bite injuries in Illinois.

Dog bite laws vary by state, but in Illinois, our statutes lean toward the ‘strict liability rule.’ This means that a dog’s owner is held liable if their pet bites or attacks another individual causing harm regardless of the animal’s prior history for aggression. The only exception to this rule applies if the bitten person was provoking the dog or trespassing on its owner’s property.

If you’re one among those who’ve been bitten by a dog, there are certain actions to take immediately after such an encounter:

• Seek medical attention immediately since these injuries can pose serious health risks

• Document your injuries well through photos & medical reports

• Report the incident to local authorities

• Identify the dog & its owner whenever possible

Proving fault for damages sustained In a dog bite case rarely requires litigation due to Illinois’ strict liability rules. However, having an experienced law firm like ourselves at Carlson Bier makes all the difference between receiving fair compensation or having inadequate restitution. We assist every step of your claim process from reviewing evidence, determining liability up until negotiating fairer settlements with insurance companies.

Dog-bite victims have rights they may not be aware of which aims at mitigating costs tied with these unfortunate accidents; Medical bills, Lost wages during recovery period; Pain suffering including emotional distress oftentimes running deeper than actual physical damage — planning any future treatments signage (plastic surgery/therapy)

In addition – and particularly notable – is that under Illinois law potential third parties could share responsibility as well including landlords or property managers where incident occurred given they were aware about presence and potentially dangerous nature this specific animal per tribal understanding thus widening scope people might be forced bear financial burden your injury; This notable legal point emphasizes need for specialized knowledgeable advocate during times distress

Further, children account for the majority of dog bite victims, especially ages from 5 to 9. Such incidents can be even more traumatic for a child and may result in long-term emotional and physical scars that necessitate additional resources such as counselling or specific treatments.

The Carlson Bier team is committed to advocating for you, giving meticulous attention to each case while providing compassionate support throughout the duration. Our focus is on protecting your rights and seeking maximum compensation so you can focus on healing.

Those who’ve recently suffered from a dog bite injury should not hesitate to contact an experienced attorney. It’s crucial to understand that every case is unique, various factors determine its value- nature of injuries sustained, medical expenses incurred-and potential future costs related associated with ongoing treatment are also worth considering.

Find out what your case could potentially be worth by clicking on the button below. Leave it in the hands of our capable team at Carlson Bier to navigate Illinois law with both proficiency and dedication; we are here for you ensuring that victims attain justice while recovering peacefully.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Roanoke Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Roanoke

Areas of Practice in Roanoke

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Focused on legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Extending skilled legal assistance for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Healthcare Malpractice

Ensuring experienced legal representation for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Fault

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, extending specialist legal guidance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Fall and Stumble Mishaps

Skilled in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking recovery for their losses.

Neonatal Traumas

Extending legal guidance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Incidents: Concentrated on helping sufferers of car accidents receive appropriate payout for injuries and harm.

Motorcycle Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal support for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Offering adept legal assistance for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for injuries.

Construction Site Accidents

Dedicated to advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Neurological Harms

Specializing in providing compassionate legal services for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Traumas

Specialized in tackling cases for people who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Dedicated to legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Death

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and professional legal representation to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Trauma

Dedicated to supporting clients with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440