FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Roanoke

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re a victim of a slip and fall accident in Roanoke, Carlson Bier LLC is your trusted partner to seek rightful justice. With extensive experience handling personal injury cases, our seasoned attorneys are proficient in the complexities of premises liability law related to slip and fall accidents. Our unyielding commitment to clients helps us ensure that property owners who fail their obligation to maintain safe conditions on their premises are held accountable. We understand the physical pain, mental trauma, financial strain these incidents bring; thus we strive for maximum compensation addressing all aspects – medical bills, lost wages & suffering caused due to negligence or unsafe conditions. We assess each case meticulously building it layer-by-layer with comprehensive evidence ensuring enhanced chances for favorable outcomes while keeping our clients well-informed throughout the process. You can count on Carlson Bier – an advocate dedicatedly serving those affected by slip and fall accidents across citieselucidating every bit of your journey towards justice begins now.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Roanoke Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the intricacies of personal injury law, particularly slip and fall accidents. Our team is comprised highly skilled personal injury attorneys based out of Illinois, making us regionally renowned experts in this field. Begin to protect your rights today by learning more about slip and fall incidents and their legal aspects.

Slip and fall cases are common but complex realm within personal injury lawsuits. While premises liability laws may seem daunting, these occurrences tend require a comprehensive understanding of details specific to varying circumstances. Tick all the boxes thoroughly to establish if you have a solid slip and fall case:

• You slipped or tripped due to an unsafe condition.

• The responsible party i.e., the owner or occupier knew (or should have known) about the danger yet failed remedial action.

• This failure led directly to your injuries.

Consider documenting as much information as possible following such incidences – any conversational context with witnesses or authorities present could possibly bolster your claim later on. Garner pivotal evidence by photographing any defects before they’re repaired which further signifies urgency for medical care right after incident. Our attorneys then strategize profusely from detailed consultations as well as careful investigations with field experts leading towards litigation procedures that push for best achievable outcomes.

It’s important to note that Illinois has its specific laws regarding slip and fall incidents:

* It operates under a ‘modified comparative negligence’ rule – if deemed partially at fault for the accident, one’s compensation can be reduced relative to their percentage of contributed blame.

* There exists a restriction period: As per statute 735 ILCS 5/13-202; two years post any occurrence remains available legally for filing such lawsuit.

We’re here every step along this journey with our clients – bearing burdens both emotional financial when coping through unforeseen challenges life surprise unwelcomely sometimes.

Realizing these facts often come steeped amidst physical pain trauma while grappling with apprehensions over mounting medical bill or loss of wages. Let our team provide a semblance of relief by securing just compensation that acknowledges your suffering while guiding you through legal intricacies. We aim to reach substantial settlements without necessitating court trials, but when indispensable- we do not flinch from going all the way.

Remember, choosing the right attorney can make a significant difference in the outcome of your case – and at Carlson Bier, we’re always prepared to fight tirelessly for justice on your behalf. When injured within Illinois due to a slip and fall accident, it’s essential seeking expert advice promptly since voicing these stakes publicly becomes vital towards enabling fair initial discussions promptly about possible settlement.

Knowing well how intense distressing this juncture could feel, Carlson Bier remains dedicatedly available alongside providing pro-bono consultation for assessing such cases preliminarily round clock!

In order making things bit easier during such harrowing times; try clicking button below finding out worthiness regarding probable cases fits allowance compensatory amounts recoverable statutorily as per Illinois laws! Remember: Quality representation an utmost priority Carlson Bier- Don’t hesitate, know today where stand legally merit prospective claim.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Roanoke Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Roanoke

Areas of Practice in Roanoke

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or perilous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Supplying skilled legal assistance for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Physician Misconduct

Offering expert legal services for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Fault

Managing cases involving faulty products, offering specialist legal guidance to individuals affected by defective items.

Geriatric Neglect

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Trip and Tumble Mishaps

Professional in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking redress for their damages.

Newborn Injuries

Supplying legal aid for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Crashes: Dedicated to aiding individuals of car accidents secure reasonable settlement for hurts and impairment.

Motorcycle Collisions

Specializing in providing representation for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Truck Collision

Offering experienced legal representation for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for losses.

Worksite Crashes

Engaged in advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Harms

Focused on delivering dedicated legal representation for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Traumas

Skilled in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered injuries from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Passing

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and adept legal representation to ensure restitution.

Spine Damage

Expert in representing victims with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​