...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Robbins

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

For those unfortunate enough to have experienced a dog bite injury in Robbins, Carlson Bier Associates stands ready to provide top-tier legal support. With significant expertise in the field of personal injury law, this esteemed firm is known for their unyielding advocacy and exceptional legal counsel in instances of Dog Bite Injuries. Their astute understanding of Illinois laws positions them at the forefront of protecting your rights and securing a fair compensation. Navigating potential trauma or psychological distress resultant from such incidents may be overwhelming; let Carlson Bier shoulder the burden by offering thorough case analysis and formidable court representation even against influential adversaries. Trust that our relentless pursuit for justice will ensure all liable parties are held accountable while you focus on recovery. Remember, the specifics matter – Carlson Bier acknowledges every detail’s significance aiming nothing less than giving each client an upper hand in these complexities surrounding Dog Bite Injury cases amidst Robbins’ community without violating any state advertising guidelines.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Robbins Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the devastating impact of dog bite injury cases and are committed to providing you with the critical support necessary in such trying situations. Based in Illinois, our expertise embodies a profound understanding of personal injury law as we aim at delivering justice to victims of dog bites and attacks.

Dog bite injuries often involve more than just physical pain; they also include emotional trauma and financial burden, significantly affecting an individual’s quality of life. They could lead to severe infections like Pasteurella, MRSA or tetanus, not mentioning potential nerve damage or scarring. Both adults and children may experience post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following such incidents. Furthermore, medical bills for treatments can escalate quickly escalating along with possible loss wages from missing work due to recovery periods.

These serious health implications underline the need for comprehensive legal protection – this is where our specialized team steps in at Carlson Bier. Armed with years of experience and dedicated passion for advocacy, we vehemently pursue your rightful claims while concurrently offering compassionate counsel expertly guiding you through these challenging times.

• Validating Liability: Our primary goal entails proving that the dog owner was negligent—failing to control their pet resulting into them causing harm – underlining their responsibility for what transpired.

• Determining Damages: We meticulously document all levels of your physical injuries along with any psychological trauma inflicted by visiting mental health professionals who assess your condition explicitly.

• Evaluating Financial Impact: Detailed evaluations are conducted pertaining to past, current, and future medical expenses related directly to the attack aftermath. Additionally, lost income is factored into settlement considerations substantiating timelines for recuperation periods.

Amidst several factors considered concerning dog bite liability in Illinois includes whether the victim provoked the animal leading up to biting incident or if the victim was performing duties mandated by state/federal laws when bitten – including postal workers delivering mail on private property.

Throughout every stage from filing lawsuits to settlement negotiations, we maintain a transparent communication channel keeping you fully informed of all progressing developments. Our approach places us in an optimal position, acting best on your behalf achieving the highest possible compensation for injuries incurred.

Navigating through dog bite injury cases merits sophisticated knowledge comprehensively understanding key facets related to personal injury law – underscored by compassionate client interaction that respects emotional vulnerability during such hardships. At Carlson Bier, these principles drive our daily commitment while advocating fiercely on behalf of our clients.

We encourage you to delve deeper into how we help turn-around such traumatic experiences towards favorable verdicts leading to adequate financial reprieve for enduring emotional and physical anguish as well meaningful steps towards recovery. We are a mere click away; reach out today using the button below to know more about your potential case value offering comprehensive relief from implications wrought by damaging dog bite injuries – world-class legal counsel is essentially at your doorstep with Carlson Bier.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Robbins Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Robbins

Areas of Practice in Robbins

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Proficient in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Burn Burns

Supplying specialist legal assistance for people of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Medical Misconduct

Ensuring professional legal services for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Accountability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, supplying expert legal support to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Malpractice

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble & Slip Accidents

Specialist in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking justice for their suffering.

Childbirth Damages

Extending legal guidance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Car Accidents

Crashes: Focused on supporting patients of car accidents get just recompense for hurts and losses.

Motorbike Collisions

Focused on providing legal services for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Big Rig Crash

Providing specialist legal advice for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for harms.

Worksite Incidents

Committed to supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Damages

Expert in extending professional legal services for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Injuries

Expertise in tackling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Specializing in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and experienced legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Impairment

Specializing in representing persons with paralysis, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer