Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Rome

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you are a victim of dog bite injuries in Rome, the immediate thought might be that it’s an unfortunate occurrence with no legal recourse. Allow us to change your perspective. At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury cases and have built a strong track record in handling dog bite injuries matters diligently and effectively. We understand Illinois law like the back of our hand, ensuring robust representation for every client who entrusts their case to us—we don’t just advocate; we fight for justice.

Dealing with medical bills after something as traumatizing as a dog attack isn’t easy—and understanding whom to hold accountable can be difficult. That’s where our expertise comes into play! Our carefully curated team investigates each case thoroughly – helping establish liability clearly and succinctly.

Remember—prompt action is crucial when dealing with dog bite incidents due to applicable statute limitations under Illinois law; hence assistance from an experienced firm like Carlson Bier increases your chances multifold at deserving recompense.

Choose attorneys who demonstrate skillful execution—it makes all the difference for a successful outcome. Simply put, choose Carlson Bier—the champions against Dog Bite Injuries.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Rome Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that animal-related injuries such as dog bite incidents can significantly impact the physical and emotional well-being of victims. As a leading personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we possess extensive experience navigating the complexity surrounding these types of cases. Knowledge is your best defense; hence we have provided insightful details about dog bite injuries to equip you with the necessary tools for navigation.

Dog bites rank high among the personal injury claims many people commonly overlook. According to recent reports from health agencies and humane societies, an estimated 4.7 million Americans suffer dog bites annually – a frighteningly substantial figure. More concerning is the fact that children are often at higher risk due to their size and inability to correctly interpret dog behavior.

When it comes to Illinois law specifically, understanding liability in dog bite cases is vital. In general terms, if a domesticated animal like a dog causes harm or injury without provocation, its owner becomes liable under Illinois’ Animal Attack or Injury Law (510 ILCS 5/16). The law holds pet owners strictly liable when unprovoked attacks occur whether on private property—provided the victim was lawfully present—or on public premises.

To deal effectively with a situation involving a canine attack several key steps need urgent implementation:

– Seek immediate medical attention: Even minor wounds may carry harmful bacteria that could cause infection.

– Document everything: Making records of your injuries including photographic evidence as well as witness contact information is crucial.

– Report promptly: Inform local animal control authorities so they can make an official report.

– Consult legal advice: Reach out immediately to an experienced attorney who understands the nuances of personal injury cases particularly those involving animals such as dogs.

With awareness and arming oneself effectively with this valuable knowledge, dealing appropriately with unfortunate incidents like these can potentially alleviate some burdensome aftermaths.

Carlson Bier excels at providing comprehensive legal assistance for victims of personal injuries caused by negligence including severe injuries from animal attacks. Our expert team delves into the complexities of your case, exploring all angles to ensure you receive full compensation for any harm suffered. We firmly believe in taking a hands-on approach to every client’s case; providing guidance and consistent communication throughout the legal process.

Quality representation makes a difference, particularly when dealing with matters such as scarring, disfigurement or psychological trauma that may last long after physical wounds have healed. The impact these cases have on victims’ lives involves more than just financial loss making it equally essential to address non-economic losses like emotional distress, pain and suffering.

At Carlson Bier, we stand ready to vigorously pursue justice. We work tirelessly and effectively presenting comprehensive evidence before judges and juries regarding the true impacts of these types of incidents on victim’s lives – not merely from a medical perspective but also regarding quality of life.

Our commitment isn’t contained only within our Illinois-based offices. Indeed, we take pride in playing an empowering role through equipping individuals with viable tools for navigating personal injury cases stemming not just from dog bites but any negligent or careless acts causing harm or damage.

While this advice is indispensable to anyone facing personal injury brought about by dog bites, we acknowledge that each incident remains unique due its circumstantial variances both legal and otherwise.We therefore encourage a personalized conversation about your specific ordeal and its implications due Monday Illinois law.

Don’t be left questioning what potential compensation could entail following your unfortunate experience—click the button below now. Discover how much your unique case could be worth; allow us to transform challenging situations into opportunities for healing and restoration. Contact Carlson Bier today—the premier personal injury attorneys of Illinois.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Rome Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Rome

Areas of Practice in Rome

Bicycle Accidents

Expert in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or hazardous conditions.

Fire Burns

Providing professional legal advice for victims of severe burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Hospital Malpractice

Ensuring specialist legal support for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Fault

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering skilled legal assistance to customers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Malpractice

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Fall Injuries

Skilled in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking justice for their damages.

Childbirth Injuries

Extending legal assistance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Incidents: Devoted to assisting victims of car accidents receive appropriate payout for harms and impairment.

Motorbike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Truck Incident

Providing expert legal representation for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for injuries.

Building Collisions

Committed to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cerebral Harms

Dedicated to delivering dedicated legal advice for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Wounds

Proficient in handling cases for clients who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Crashes

Expert in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Unfair Fatality

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and adept legal assistance to ensure justice.

Neural Impairment

Dedicated to representing clients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer