FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Romeoville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Dealing with dog bite injuries can be cumbersome without professional legal help, and Carlson Bier stands to provide just that. As an Illinois-based personal injury law firm, we understand the intricacies of such suffering and have a profound reputation built upon countless success stories from clients who had similar experiences. Our proven track record in representing victims of dog bite injuries propels us ahead as your perfect legal partner here in Romeoville. We guide you through the convoluted process beginning right from investigating the details to concluding on solid proofs against responsible parties; thereby leveraging our expertise for rightful compensation claims for medical expenses, lost wages and emotional trauma associated with these episodes of life-altering harm. If you’re seeking unmatched dedication in handling your case coupled with compassionate client services, count on Carlson Bier where excellence is not merely a promise but practice everyday held paramount for every individual’s cause we represent. Remember: when it’s about dealing with dog bite injuries – Trust No One Else!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Romeoville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your trusted Illinois personal injury attorney group, we are fully committed to protecting the interests of our clients who have suffered due to dog bite injuries. Dog bites expose individuals to serious health risks beyond just skin damage. They cause psychological trauma and can lead to costly medical bills for treatments such as wound dressing, stitches, antibiotics treatment, antirabies shots, and potentially plastic surgery in severe cases.

Being a victim of a dog bite is an unfortunate circumstance that’s often compounded by complexity when it comes to claiming compensation for the damages incurred. Fortunately for you, our team at Carlson Bier is experienced in handling these intricate legal procedures, aiming at ensuring victims get the justice they deserve.

Educating our clients about their rights and painting a clear picture of how personal injury law operates specific to dog bite incidents is part of our obligation here at Carlson Bier. That being said;

• If anyone has been bitten or attacked by another person’s dog unprovoked, whether in public or privately without trespassing on their property under Illinois state law you’re entitled to claim compensation.

• The owner stands liable unless they convincingly demonstrate that the victim was either trespassing or provoked the animal into attacking.

• Compensation claims may be lodged covering pain and suffering caused , loss of income during recovery period along with any rehabilitation costs associated with severe attacks which might leave someone disabled.

The quality representation provided by Carlson Bier doesn’t simply rely on understanding personal injury laws but backed with relentless dedication towards pursuing full compensation for damages experienced because of dog bites injuries.

Our endeavor towards client satisfaction includes providing proper guidance through each step within the legal process while maintaining open communication lines throughout this journey together. We understand that each situation is unique thus needing personalized approach tailored towards individual circumstances underlying every case presented before us.

At Carlson Bier, dealing with insurance companies forms part of many successful resolutions brought forward involving dog bites incidents over years past – where negotiations aim at expedited settlements getting victims back on track swiftly with minimum disruption to their everyday lives.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), close to 4.5 million dog bites occur in the United States every year, with more than 800,000 requiring medical treatment. Illinois is no exception to these statistics. At Carlson Bier, we have dedicated attorneys who are specialized in handling dog bite cases and remain committed towards fighting tirelessly on behalf of those affected making sure justice prevails ultimately within the legal domain that would otherwise seem daunting for individuals battling alone.

Our aim at Carlson Bier does not stop at seeking compensation alone; rather it extends further into raising public awareness around responsible pet ownership as a proactive measure minimizing such incidents from recurring again within our communities whenever avoidable.

If you or anyone you know has suffered from injuries due to dog bites in Illinois, do not hesitate in reaching out today immediately. We encourage you through this journey knowing very well that standing up against negligence causing pain can feel overwhelming; however, remember: You’re never alone when armed with professional assistance provided here at Carlson Bier.

We invite you now to click the button below which will give an estimation of potential claim value based upon details inherent within your case – helping better understand what lies ahead along this journey together fighting for justice rightfully deserved as a victim of dog bite injury.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Romeoville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Romeoville

Areas of Practice in Romeoville

Cycling Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Offering expert legal services for patients of serious burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Medical Malpractice

Extending expert legal support for patients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Obligation

Taking on cases involving defective products, providing skilled legal guidance to customers affected by defective items.

Elder Neglect

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble & Tumble Incidents

Specialist in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking restitution for their suffering.

Newborn Harms

Delivering legal support for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Crashes

Incidents: Focused on assisting clients of car accidents secure equitable payout for harms and losses.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Committed to providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Trucking Accident

Delivering expert legal assistance for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for injuries.

Construction Site Mishaps

Engaged in assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Cognitive Damages

Expert in offering expert legal services for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Damages

Specialized in dealing with cases for people who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Crashes

Dedicated to legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Fatality

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and experienced legal representation to ensure fairness.

Spine Injury

Expert in representing persons with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440