...

Bicycle Accidents in Roodhouse

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When involved in a bicycle accident, dealing with the aftermath can be a daunting task. It is in such times that you need the professional and experienced legal services offered by Carlson Bier to guide you through this challenging period. As one of Illinois’ most renown personal injury firms, we specialize in tackling complex issues arising from bicycle accidents within Roodhouse’s jurisdictional boundaries. Our commitment goes beyond providing top-notch legal representation; it is about ensuring our clients’ rights are vigorously defended even as we seek maximum compensation for their injuries and losses suffered from these incidents. The experience and knowledge held by our team of dedicated attorneys set us apart – allowing us to understand your situation better while delivering customized solutions that suit your specific needs. If you’re seeking skilled advocacy following a bicycle accident, look no further than Carlson Bier where integrity meets proficiency for the ultimate victory against injustice.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Roodhouse Illinois

Bicycle accidents, often times result in significant physical injuries and emotional distress. When you’re facing such a challenging time, it’s important to know where to turn for professional help. Carlson Bier is an esteemed law firm based in Illinois that specializes in personal injury cases like bicycle accidents. We possess the extensive knowledge and expertise required to competently handle cases of this nature.

Firstly, we want you to understand that bike-related mishaps are not uncommon; In fact, each year hundreds of cyclists get injured on Illinois roads due to various reasons. Some factors contributing towards these unfortunate incidents include inattentive drivers, hazardous road conditions, faulty bicycle equipment and more.

Secondly, unlike car accidents which can be straightforward insurance matters, bike accidents involve more nuanced laws. That’s why having a team of attorneys who are well-versed with these particulars becomes essential when claiming compensation for your losses. Bear in mind:

• The amount of compensation you can recover will largely depend on the extent of your injuries.

• Compensation may also cover loss wages if the victim has been unable to attend work after the accident.

• It also includes pain and suffering or any other hardships endured by the victim as a direct outcome of the accident.

Navigating through complex laws associated with bicycle accidents requires skilled legal representation from experienced attorneys like those at Carlson Bier. Over our years practicing personal injury law, we have secured millions of dollars for our clients either through settlement negotiations or court verdicts.

We draw upon our deep understanding of both state and local regulations pertaining to bicycles and motor vehicle interaction on public streets – bringing forth every possible aspect regarding fault determination and accountability into consideration while building your case. This comprehensive approach enhances chances for favorability when it comes to financial restitution – ensuring victims can afford medical care and enjoy peace amid recovery aftermath without unnecessary financial burdens looming over them.

Moreover, it’s crucial that communication lines between you and us remain open throughout the duration of the case. Our attorneys believe in maintaining transparency with our clients, keeping them informed and involved at every major juncture. This way, you as a client feel empowered knowing all possible options available to you – while we together make the best legal decisions moving forward.

Finally, remember that there’s no risk in reaching out to us for a free consultation regarding your bicycle accident case. In fact, we operate under a contingency fee plan – implying that you owe us nothing until we successfully recover compensation on your behalf. It’s part of our commitment towards yielding justice for victims whose lives have been impacted from devastating bike accidents.

If you or someone you love has gone through such an incident recently, it’s time to take action. A personal injury claim will not only bring(s) financial relief but also serve as a tool to ensure similar incidents are prevented from occurring in future – making Illinois roads safer one claim at a time.

Before wrapping things up, if there’s something more specific about filing claims post-bicycle accidents that needs immediate attention – kindly go ahead clicking on the button below for knowledge enrichment. Not only does this act pave way for timely remedial financial assistance; but helps understand what is legally owed ensuring rightful recovery following distressful times like these.

Here at Carlson Bier in Illinois, we stand by our mission of serving accident victims with devotion and professional competency they deserve – so much intricacy associated within cases like these guaranteeing maximum value return along lines of damage reparation upon successful resolutions. Don’t let fear stop your pursuit of justice after enduring misfortune originating from biking injuries; click below today to find out how much your case could potentially be worth!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Roodhouse Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Roodhouse

Areas of Practice in Roodhouse

Cycling Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Providing specialist legal help for patients of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Negligence

Delivering dedicated legal advice for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Fault

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, providing expert legal assistance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Aged Mistreatment

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Trip & Stumble Mishaps

Adept in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking redress for their suffering.

Infant Traumas

Delivering legal assistance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Incidents

Crashes: Focused on helping individuals of car accidents secure reasonable payout for damages and harm.

Scooter Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Extending experienced legal representation for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for injuries.

Construction Site Collisions

Engaged in defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cognitive Damages

Focused on extending expert legal services for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Wounds

Specialized in tackling cases for persons who have suffered traumas from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Committed to legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Wrongful Loss

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and adept legal representation to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Injury

Focused on assisting clients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal representation to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer