...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Roodhouse

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with dog bite injuries in Roodhouse, having expert legal representation is paramount. Carlson Bier is renowned for its unparalleled expertise and passion for personal injury cases, particularly those involving dog bite incidents. The team at Carlson Bier understands the gravity of the emotional distress, physical pain, and financial burden associated with such incidents. Their attorneys are highly skilled in navigating Illinois’ complex civil law landscape related to animal attacks to advocate for your rights vigorously. Besides their legal expertise, their empathic approach sets them apart from others—they treat every case as unique and strive relentlessly to ensure clients receive fair compensation they truly deserve for medical expenses and other damages that arise due to these harrowing situations—the typical hallmarks of a leading player within this specific lawyering niche. If you’re seeking justice after a dog-related accident resulting in bodily harm or mental trauma within Roodhouse city limits—or anywhere else—Carlson Bier stands ready.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Roodhouse Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the severity and complexities associated with dog bite injuries. Recognized as a leading personal injury law firm in Illinois, our dedicated team embodies an unwavering dedication to safeguarding your rights while delivering exceptional legal representation.

Dog bites can inflict severe physical harm ranging from small puncture wounds to serious bone fractures. Sometimes, victims might face psychological trauma long after their wounds have healed. Our skilled attorneys strive not only to protect your legal rights but also ensure complete rehabilitation and recovery from such distressing incidents.

Illinois ranks high among states with stringent laws for dog owners who are held strictly liable if their pets cause any bodily harm or property damage. Essentially, if a person is bitten by a dog without provoking it in an area where they are legally allowed to be – the owner becomes automatically responsible for the victim’s injuries.

Navigating through these complexities, especially while dealing with medical treatments, can be daunting for anyone. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in; with decades of experience handling numerous cases involving diverse breeds from harmless lapdogs to muscular guard dogs.

Key aspects that we focus on include:

• Thorough investigation: Each case starts by sifting through nitty-gritty details such as leash laws prevalent in the region where the incident happened and assessing other possible liability factors.

• Proving Liability: We corroborate evidence like hospital records, eyewitness accounts or police reports to establish the pet owner’s strict liability unequivocally.

• Compensation Estimation: We carefully assess all damages be it medical expenses, loss of income during recovery period or pain caused due to permanent scarring/ disfigurement.

Simply put, seeking help from experienced lawyers at Carlson Bier takes you one step closer towards easing out complications related to your claims litigation process.

Our resources section provides detailed guidance regarding immediate safety measures post-dog bite incidents including rendering first aid and reporting said incident to appropriate authorities promptly. Moreover, we provide counsel regarding potential defenses pet owners may resort to including trespassing and contributing negligence.

Our driven team at Carlson Bier reaches out to medical professionals, proficient animal behaviorists and seasoned investigators as required to build robust cases for our esteemed clients. Over the years, handling a broad-ranging spectrum of cases has given us exceptional proficiency in identifying behavioral triggers causing dog bites. By meticulously analyzing factors such as dog’s back story, history of violent instances or lack thereof; possible physical ailments triggering unprecedented aggression – we aim at ensuring maximum compensation for our clients.

Whether your case involves an aggressive neighborhood canine or an unexpected incident involving a friend’s harmless pet – reach out to us at Carlson Bier for free expert guidance.

At this stage, you might be wondering about the worth of your case considering multiple factors encompassing dimensions of physical injury, psychological trauma and incurred expenses battling the aftermath. With years of lawful experience under our belt and comprehensive understanding consumers’ rights in Illinois – our attorneys can provide accurate evaluations prompting adequate restitution claims onto responsible parties thus urging them towards settling without trial.

This uncertainty is natural! But worry no more. Click on the button below to ascertain how much you could potentially claim against your unfortunate dog bite incident swiftly and accurately with veteran lawyers from Carlson Bier by your side. Be one step closer to complete recovery while we decisively fight for justice on your behalf.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Roodhouse Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Roodhouse

Areas of Practice in Roodhouse

Cycling Incidents

Focused on legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Scald Burns

Extending professional legal services for individuals of major burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Providing experienced legal services for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Fault

Taking on cases involving faulty products, offering specialist legal services to consumers affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Fall Mishaps

Adept in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking redress for their injuries.

Birth Harms

Supplying legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Crashes: Devoted to assisting individuals of car accidents gain just remuneration for damages and damages.

Motorbike Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal advice for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

18-Wheeler Incident

Offering experienced legal support for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for losses.

Building Site Collisions

Dedicated to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Brain Impairments

Expert in ensuring specialized legal services for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Damages

Specialized in managing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Specializing in legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Demise

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and professional legal support to ensure compensation.

Spine Damage

Expert in advocating for persons with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​