...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Roselle

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with dog bite injuries, you need a dedicated and experienced team of attorneys that understand the complexities of such cases. Carlson Bier is renowned for possessing the necessary expertise to handle these delicate issues efficiently. Our firm holds an impressive track record in fighting for our clients’ rights across Illinois, helping them recover rightful compensation. Professionals at Carlson Bier skillfully navigate through complex legal landscapes while maintaining unabated empathy towards victims of dog bites.The impact of these incidents can be severe and life-altering; we strive to help alleviate some burdens through unwavering commitment to your case.Having applicable knowledge about Illinois law and local statutes lends credibility to our delivery.We tirelessly fight against negligent parties, negotiating arduously till justice is assured.With extensive experience handling personal injury matters including dog bite injuries, count on us for prompt communication,resilience,and result-oriented advocacy.Rely on Carlson Bier—a name backed by virtuous action—for all your Dog Bite Injuries related needs—an incomparable choice within this realm.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Roselle Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the impact and trauma that dog bite injuries can inflict. Based in Illinois, our impeccable team of personal injury attorneys is committed to fostering strong relationships with clients by offering unmatched legal representation during their times-of-need.

Dog bites are not only physically painful but also emotionally distressing. The unpredictability of such incidents brings about potential health implications including infections, physical scarring, emotional trauma, or even fatality in severe cases. While biting instances vary from minor nips to grievous assaults by aggressive breeds, it’s crucial for potential victims to be well-informed about their rights under Illinois law.

• As per Illinois Animal Control Act: Owners are liable if a dog or other animal attacks without provocation.

• “Strict liability” statute: Regardless of the pet’s previous behavior or owner’s knowledge thereof; they will still be held accountable if their pet causes harm.

As seasoned experts specializing in Personal Injury Law at Carlson Bier, we dedicate ourselves to ensure that every client fully comprehends their rightful protections against dog bite injuries as per the state legislation. We strive towards claiming your entitled compensation covering all medical costs incurred from treating these injuries along with therapy sessions for post-traumatic stress disorders and any additional financial losses borne due to interruption in work schedules owing to recovery periods.

Moreover, compensations extend beyond just financial restitution. Non-economic damages concerning pain and suffering caused, interference with daily accommodations due to the injury alongside loss of companionship specifically when children become victims leading them into an oppressed social setting are eligible grounds too.

Despite prevailing myths suggesting that aggressors like Pit bulls and Rottweilers dominate the risk group causing grave harms presenting grounds for solid cases is incorrect. No matter how small or docile pets might seem if they result in impairments – provided there was no provocation – attempts must certainly be made at filing claims. Understanding this comprehensive nature of protection facilitates an informed move whereby you do not undermine injurious situations.

In instances where multiple parties get injured by the same dog, it becomes lawfully complex to determine liability distribution. This scenario showcasing shared negligence is tackled optimally at Carlson Bier with our attorneys allocating time-intensive focus on such cases.

While the area might seem intricate, a pivotal part of winning these claims that need attention is amassing detailed documentation from injuries sustained as well as collated eye-witness accounts wherever possible. A regular practice prevalent among insurers is declining such claims attributing them towards self-provoked or unprovoked attacks.

At Carlson Bier, we work exclusively on contingency basis meaning no charge until your settlement has been successfully won and the case concluded to satisfaction. We craft strong legal theories for every client’s unique situation supporting them during this demanding journey without further burdening their financial struggles.

We hope this in-depth exploration brings clarity regarding your rights and options in circumstances involving dog bite injuries under Illinois Law. Click the button below to discover how much your case could potentially be worth – let us stand by you legally empowering you against any adversity that comes unchecked!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Roselle Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Roselle

Areas of Practice in Roselle

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Expert in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Flame Damages

Supplying adept legal assistance for people of severe burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Clinical Incompetence

Delivering professional legal services for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Responsibility

Addressing cases involving defective products, extending skilled legal support to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Senior Misconduct

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Fall Occurrences

Adept in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking redress for their losses.

Childbirth Injuries

Providing legal help for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Accidents

Mishaps: Focused on supporting sufferers of car accidents get just payout for injuries and destruction.

Motorbike Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal services for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Trucking Accident

Delivering adept legal support for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for damages.

Worksite Crashes

Engaged in supporting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cerebral Impairments

Dedicated to offering compassionate legal services for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Injuries

Proficient in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from dog bites or creature assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Specializing in legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unfair Fatality

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and professional legal representation to ensure redress.

Neural Impairment

Dedicated to representing patients with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal services to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​