FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Roselle

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the devastating aftermath of a Spinal Cord Injury, choosing legal representation can be an overwhelming process. Carlson Bier offers unparalleled expertise in handling such cases with seamless professionalism and profound sensitivity to your unique needs. Navigating through intricate Illinois laws becomes a lot less daunting with their seasoned team at the helm, dedicating itself to protecting your rights tirelessly throughout the litigation journey. Whether seeking compensation for medical costs or pursuing justice against negligent parties, you’ll need proficient lawyers committed to securing suitable settlements and verdicts on our behalf—the very category that defines Carlson Bier’s highly regarded performance record over time. As tireless advocates for their clients’ welfare, they have demonstrated diligent focus on all legal aspects involved in Spinal Cord Injuries cases—an exceptional trait clearly attesting their prowess as personal injury attorneys of choice. For anyone embroiled in the stressful complexities associated with significant harm inflicted upon one’s spinal cord—Carlson Bier delivers what it promises: reliable advocacy underpinned by deep-rooted understanding of this specific law domain.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Roselle Illinois

If you or a loved one has suffered a devastating spinal cord injury, the dedicated law firm of Carlson Bier in Illinois is ready to provide the guidance and support you need during this challenging time. Understanding your injury is an essential facet of managing its impacts and clarifying what legal recourse you might seek.

Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) disrupt communication between the brain and body which can significantly alter an individual’s quality of life. They often occur due to severe trauma like vehicular accidents, violent encounters, sports injuries or falls and could cause symptoms such as paralysis, pain, numbness, decreased motor functionality or even mental health conditions like depression.

Yet comprehending one’s spinal cord injury vicissitude goes beyond symptoms; it involves multiple aspects detailed below:

– Classification: Spinal cord injuries are classified as complete or incomplete based on severity. A complete SCI results in total loss of function below the level of the injury while an incomplete SCI indicates partial preservation of functionality.

– Location: The location of the SCI on your vertebrae determines how much function may be lost. Cervical SCIs typically result in quadriplegia while thoracic or lumbar spine injuries often lead to paraplegia.

– Complications: Potential complications can range from respiratory issues and pressure ulcers to bowel and bladder dysfunction – all requiring various treatments.

Engaging experienced personal injury attorneys like Carlson Bier for cases involving spinal cord injuries provides victims with an ally who understands these intricacies. Our expertise extends far beyond standard compensation claims for medical expense reimbursement and lost wages; we strive for justice by helping clients claim deserved compensation for altered lifestyles, extended rehabilitation needs, emotional distress, long-term care costs among other consequences unaddressed by traditional court awards.

Carlson Bier also brings into light critical timeframes involved in personal injury litigations related to SCIs – including statutes of limitation that dictate how long a victim has to initiate a lawsuit and filing rules that could have significant bearing on the claim’s outcome. Letting our seasoned team handle these complexities can allow you to focus more heavily on recovery, adjustment and rehabilitation after an SCI.

When you contact us at Carlson Bier in Illinois, we start with a case evaluation free of charge. We don’t get paid unless you do – underlining both our confidence in successfully representing you and eliminating any financial risks for seeking apt legal help. Be it negotiation or litigation; know that ours is a diligent approach backed by years of experience in handling personal injury cases involving spinal cord injuries.

Along with fighting tooth and nail for your rightful compensation, believe that your relationship with Carlson Bier doesn’t end when the case concludes. We understand lifelong implications spinal cord injuries bring about – physical disability to psychological traumas – emphasizing continued support to ensure victims receive utmost care even post-settlement.

Prompt action is imperative not just in terms of medical treatment but also from a legal standpoint following spinal cord injuries. The timeframes are tight and evidence gathering crucial – meaning, the sooner an experienced attorney can step into review your situation, higher the likelihood for achieving favorable results out of the lawsuit.

So why wait? Pressing forward now displays no downsides – stake your claims rightfully through representation by practiced SCI attorneys at Carlson Bier who will tirelessly work towards securing justice you deserve while helping navigate medical terminologies/states, insurance company tactics or jury considerations inherent in personal injury cases relating SCIs.

Curious how much your case might be worth? Allow us to provide insights tailored specifically to circumstances surrounding your spinal cord injury incident without any upfront costs or obligations by clicking on the button below today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Roselle Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Roselle

Areas of Practice in Roselle

Cycling Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or hazardous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Giving skilled legal assistance for patients of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Hospital Incompetence

Extending specialist legal representation for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Responsibility

Addressing cases involving faulty products, supplying adept legal guidance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Malpractice

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Trip Injuries

Specialist in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking redress for their harm.

Infant Damages

Extending legal help for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Incidents: Devoted to assisting victims of car accidents obtain appropriate remuneration for harms and damages.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Expert in providing legal support for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Truck Incident

Providing expert legal representation for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for losses.

Building Accidents

Committed to representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Head Damages

Specializing in delivering expert legal services for individuals suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Wounds

Adept at tackling cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unjust Passing

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and skilled legal guidance to ensure redress.

Vertebral Injury

Dedicated to advocating for patients with spine impairments, offering specialized legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​