...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Rosemont

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one are seeking compensation for dog-bite injuries in Rosemont, Carlson Bier is the legal advocate you need. As established Illinois personal injury attorneys, our expertise rests in guiding dog bite victims through complex litigation processes to ensure justice is served. Injuries from dogs can lead to expensive medical costs, psychological trauma and lost wages; we strive relentlessly to secure full compensation covering such losses on your behalf. Our experienced team will methodically investigate each case’s unique circumstances, offering robust representation that uniquely outlines their skill set and experience with Dog Bite Injury cases. At Carlson Bier we understand the immense trust invested in us by clients during perhaps some of their most challenging times, which fuels our drive for securing optimal outcomes tailored according to your distinct requirements. Representing residents throughout Illinois but concentrating on Rosemont area clientele reaffirms our unwavering commitment towards this community while operating diligently within legal boundaries without compromising ethics and integrity.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Rosemont Illinois

Navigating the intricacies of Illinois legal procedure can be challenging, especially when it comes to personal injury from a canine attack. At Carlson Bier, we specialize in identifying key aspects that could make a significant difference to your case’s outcome. Our focus on dog bite injuries sets us apart as leaders in this unique segment of personal injury law.

Dog attacks can lead to severe trauma – both physical and emotional. Recognizing these unfortunate incidents, Illinois aligns with the ‘strict liability’ rule when it comes to dog bite cases. Simply put, if a dog has bitten you without provocation, even if the pet owner was unaware of its aggressive tendencies or was not negligent in preventing the incident— they’re still responsible for damages.

• The nature of your injuries: The extent of actual physical harm done by a dog bite is critical evidence. Medical records documenting puncture wounds, lacerations, scarring, nerve damage or any necessary surgeries help establish the severity.

• Emotional distress: In addition to obvious physical hurt, many victims suffer traumatic psychological effects like PTSD due to an animal attack.

• Losses incurred: Any loss suffered–including income owing to absence from work during recovery periods– must also be taken into account.

The crux here lies in adequately establishing and quantifying these components effectively and persuasively before a judge or jury- that’s where our performance excels.

At Carlson Bier, we take pride in our comprehensive investigative approach which involves collecting crucial evidence such as photographic documentation of injuries; interviewing witnesses; procuring official reports (like those from Animal Control); analyzing medical documents; then combining all this data cogently into compelling legal arguments helping secure favorable settlements or verdicts.

Additionally:

• We guide you through settlement negotiations with insurance companies and ensure their tactics do not undermine your rightful claim value.

• Experience matters! Our team practices exclusively personal injury law allowing us direct insight into obtaining the maximum compensation you deserve.

Education and knowledge sharing form the underpinning of our services at Carlson Bier— making it easier for clients to understand their legal rights and proposed courses of action. Empowering you with information leads to informed decisions ensuring no personal injury victim is left in a lurch when seeking justice and fair compensation.

One aspect we stress upon is promptness – Remember, Illinois imposes strict time limits (statutes of limitations) on filing personal injury lawsuits. Failing to file your claims within this window could permanently hinder your claim – no matter how significant your injuries or valid your case.

On navigating next steps if bitten by a dog:

• Seek immediate medical attention.

• Document all related expenses incurred as a result.

• Collect evidence: If safely possible, gather photographs of the scene; record details like date, location, etc.

• Jot down contact details and insurance information of the pet owner.

Your safety and obtaining necessary care are paramount!

To briefly pause here- Have you been affected by a dog bite incident in Illinois? You may be entitled to recover costs for medical bills, lost wages, future earning potential diminishments due to scarring/dismemberment or even non-economic damages like pain/suffering. How is such an estimation made?

The value estimation process can be intricate frequently reflecting severity of injuries; impact on daily living activities; permanence/nature/type/location of scarring/injuries received; continuity/complications in therapy/treatment after being bitten-simply put-no two cases are alike. The most reliable way to get an accurate estimate of what could potentially be recovered from an aggressive-animal-induced accident typically involves engaging experienced professionals who’ve navigated similar situations.

Illinois state law regarding locations demands real representation- rest assured that Carlson Bier’s commitment has firm roots across countless cities throughout this great Prairie State experiencing firsthand differing community nuances playing an instrumental role during a dog-bite case’s course.

In ending, if confident legal representation—which works tirelessly to secure your rights—matters: Look no further. Carlson Bier has become synonymous with excellence in Illinois dog-bite personal injury cases over years of successful representation getting clients justly compensated and lives back on track.

So what would be the next sensible step post an unfortunate canine encounter? Obtain professional input from our trusted team about your unique scenario and potentially recoverable damages. By clicking the button below you can conveniently start this all-important conversation, leading to understanding what your individual case could truly be worth-like many pleased former clients have discovered already! Click now-don’t miss out; let’s help ease burden while restoring deserved normalcy from losses suffered due to a dog bite.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Rosemont Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Rosemont

Areas of Practice in Rosemont

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Burn Damages

Supplying professional legal assistance for victims of serious burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Clinical Negligence

Delivering specialist legal advice for clients affected by medical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Accountability

Addressing cases involving problematic products, providing expert legal support to clients affected by faulty goods.

Senior Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Stumble Mishaps

Adept in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking recovery for their harm.

Birth Harms

Extending legal support for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Accidents: Dedicated to assisting sufferers of car accidents get fair compensation for wounds and destruction.

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Trucking Collision

Delivering experienced legal services for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for harms.

Building Site Incidents

Focused on defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Cognitive Impairments

Focused on extending specialized legal advice for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Proficient in managing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Specializing in legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Death

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and skilled legal services to ensure redress.

Spine Impairment

Focused on assisting persons with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​