FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Rosemont

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a spinal cord injury can have drastic effects on your life, often requiring comprehensive and costly medical treatment. When such an injury has been sustained due to the negligence or wrongdoing of another party, seeking legal representation is critical. The law firm of Carlson Bier stands out as a superior choice for personal injury attorney services in Illinois. They have built an esteemed reputation by specializing in spinal cord injuries cases; effectively advocating for their clients’ rights while navigating the complex landscape of personal injury law with skill and precision. As seasoned attorneys, they possess extensive knowledge about the specific medical aspects involved and understand just how physically, emotionally, and financially disruptive these types of injuries can be to victims and their families alike. Trust your fight towards compensation to Carlson Bier who will leverage their expertise to help bring justice via rightful remuneration for all hardships endured due to your spinal cord injury.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Rosemont Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the intricate nature of personal injury cases, especially those related to spinal cord injuries. Each year in Illinois alone, a large number of residents suffer from trauma involving severe damage to the spine. These injuries have life-altering consequences and navigating through their aftermath can be complex for both victims and families.

Spinal Cord Injuries could result from multitude occurrences including motor vehicular accidents, falls, sports-related incidents or any dire event that triggers damage to your spine. The level of intensity varies- it might range from temporary mild pain to long-term debilitating issues such as loss of mobility or function. Understanding the fundamentals associated with myriad classifications is vital.

The most common types include:

• Quadriplegia: Paralysis of all four limbs.

• Paraplegia: Paralysis affecting the legs and lower body.

• Complete Spinal Cord Injury: No sensory or motor function below the level of injury.

• Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: Some degree of feeling remains beneath the point of injury.

Each accident victim has unique conditions and symptoms; thus, determining their case’s worth can be daunting without legal guidance. At Carlson Bier, our attorneys possess vast knowledge about medical complexities involved in individual cases complemented by practical insights into how insurance companies operate—essential skills needed when seeking optimal restitution for clients suffering from spinal cord injuries.

Properly distinguishing between different degrees and areas impacted by these injuries is crucial when considering remedies under personal injury law– since potential recovery depends directly on severity and physical impact these traumas wreak on victims’ bodies and lives. Furthermore, being cognizant about other influencers like derailed quality-of-life due to chronic pain or distress provide useful insight while estimating damages inflicted upon you.

Accounting past-present-near future expenses should also feature predominantly during formulations – encompassing costs incurred in medical operations/procedures/treatments/rehabilitations alongside loss-of-income due to temporary or permanent inability to resume occupational activities.

Additionally, our Illinois personal injury attorneys understand the emotional toll these injuries often levy upon victims and their families. We make sure that the compensation you receive isn’t limited strictly to covering hard costs but extends towards addressing trauma and pain suffered, including damages related to psychological stress – a crucial component when calculating suitable settlements in your favor.

In working with Carlson Bier, you will find more than just a law firm; you’ll discover confidants who prioritize your best interests above all else. We believe in tireless advocacy for those severely impacted by spinal cord injuries – accompany them throughout every step of their convalescence journey – striving always deliver justice deservedly owed.

Although it’s impossible to reverse physical/mental angst endured due to such adversities, we can help alleviate some financial burdens associated. Reconstituting semblance-of-peace within disrupted lives is what drives us – and motivates us relentlessly represent our clients’ rights.

If navigating aftermath from serious spinal injuries evokes feelings of trepidation within you—if complexities involved overwhelm you—it’s essential not feel alone during such unprecedented moments. When faced with sudden adversity—one that affects every aspect of life—the value of possessing guided legal representation can’t be overstated.

Your pursuit for justice deserves unwavering commitment—something that we at Carlson Bier strive tirelessly provide each and every day.

As fallout begins subsiding—as dust starts settling down—you might start questioning: What next? Is there recompense for tribulations suffered? Well, take solace knowing answers are readily available…A single click awaits!

Discover how much your case may potentially be worth by clicking on the button below thus bringing needed clarity amidst unsettling times marked by disarray.

Our lawyers stand ready guide through intricacies enmeshed deeply within realms of Personal Injury Law; navigate this labyrinth together! Trust experience accumulated over decades—rely expertise honed relentlessly– place faith unwavering tenacity exhibited Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys. Together, we can turn around these calamitous tides while ensuring rightful justice gets served duly!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Rosemont Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Rosemont

Areas of Practice in Rosemont

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or risky conditions.

Scald Wounds

Providing professional legal support for victims of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Clinical Misconduct

Extending dedicated legal support for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Liability

Dealing with cases involving defective products, delivering skilled legal assistance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Neglect

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Trip and Trip Occurrences

Expert in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking justice for their harm.

Newborn Harms

Providing legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Accidents: Devoted to supporting clients of car accidents gain appropriate settlement for harms and damages.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Semi Incident

Delivering experienced legal services for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for harms.

Construction Mishaps

Engaged in defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Head Damages

Expert in extending professional legal support for victims suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Injuries

Adept at addressing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Committed to legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unfair Death

Working for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and adept legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spine Damage

Focused on assisting victims with paralysis, offering expert legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​