FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Roseville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury can be painful and traumatic. Protect your rights with the skilled, experienced team of Carlson Bier in handling such complex cases. Based in Illinois, we understand the nuances of personal injury law and emphasize on detailed investigation to ensure you receive fair compensation for your distress. Our lawyer’s expertise specifically extends to challenging dog bite injuries where it matters most. As your legal counsel, Carlson Bier remains steadfast in advocating for victims’ rights while navigating through State legislations intricately connected to each unique case scenario. The Illinois state laws surrounding Dog Bite Injuries are complex; however, our commitment is uncompromising when ensuring faultless victims get their rightful justice served unceasingly everywhere including Roseville . Injury claims require astute negotiation skills; hence you need a trusted partner like us who won’t undervalue your sufferings and inflictions led by dog bites – trust none other than Carlson Bier as guardian custodians towards securing only the best results for all permutations of suffered damages ensured by our unparalleled reputation symbolised across various demographics.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Roseville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the terrifying experience and painful impact a dog bite injury can impose on an individual. As a renowned personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, our special expertise extends to tackling the intricacies of such animal attack cases. Through this page, we aim to deliver valuable information and insightful knowledge about dog bite injuries, designed for effortless comprehension so you can be better prepared if you or your loved ones ever face similar circumstances.

Dog bites often result in physical injuries that might necessitate medical treatment ranging from minor wound care to surgery in severe instances. Some frequently witnessed physical repercussions include cuts and lacerations, puncture wounds, broken bones, crush injuries to muscles and soft tissues. However, beyond their immediately observable consequences like pain and functional impairment, there are other potential complications associated with unattended dog bites victims should also consider:

– Infections: Dog’s mouths harbor various harmful bacteria such as Pasteurella multocida and Capnocytophaga Canimorsus which could lead to serious infections.

– Rabies: Although rare in domestic pets due to vaccinations protocols commonly followed in the US, rabies remains a deadly disease transmitted through dog bites.

– Psychological trauma: This usually manifests itself as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), causing sufferers fear towards dogs or affecting normal daily life routines irrationally.

The laws surrounding dog bites are complex yet exceptionally important when seeking reparation for endured damages. In Illinois specifically it is crucial to know that under 510 ILCS 5/16 (Illinois Animal Control Act), a victim who has suffered an unprovoked attack by any pet may hold their owners legally accountable for incurred damages without need for proving negligence on part of the owner.

When processing the legalities post a dog bite incident remember that photographs of your injuries before they heal are critical evidence supporting your claim. Also ensure all medical treatments received consequent to the injury is documented and bills properly preserved.

Bringing a personal injury claim for dog bite is not about instigating a blame game but ensuring fair compensation for unjustifiable suffering. To this end Carlson Bier’s adept team relentlessly works to safeguard your legal rights, providing you exceptional representation whilst facilitating comprehensive understanding of the intricate legalities involved.

While we’ve presented important information throughout this discussion, remember that every situation is unique with its distinct set of circumstantial variances influencing the case proceedings and outcomes. Accurately determining how much your specific case may be worth in monetary terms requires careful evaluation by seasoned professionals who understand the nuances associated with dog bite cases.

This evaluation includes aspects like consideration of any future required medical treatments or potential long-term effects like emotional distress cost when assessing damages to ensure rightful compensation covers all foreseeable needs stemming from this traumatic event.

With our experienced team at Carlson Bier advocating for you, take solace knowing we are there beside you every step of the way – offering insightful counsel while zealously representing your best interests in corridors of justice. Click on ‘Find Out How Much Your Case Is Worth’ button below today – let us assist you navigate these challenging times and secure the settlement you justifiably deserve.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Roseville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Roseville

Areas of Practice in Roseville

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Focused on legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Giving adept legal support for victims of severe burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Hospital Negligence

Extending dedicated legal support for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Accountability

Handling cases involving defective products, extending professional legal support to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Abuse

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Tumble Occurrences

Skilled in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking recovery for their harm.

Childbirth Harms

Delivering legal assistance for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Mishaps: Dedicated to helping patients of car accidents receive appropriate recompense for wounds and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Expert in providing legal support for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Big Rig Collision

Delivering specialist legal support for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for damages.

Construction Site Mishaps

Committed to supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Head Injuries

Specializing in extending professional legal assistance for victims suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Traumas

Adept at handling cases for people who have suffered traumas from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Focused on legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Fatality

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and professional legal representation to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Harm

Specializing in advocating for clients with paralysis, offering specialized legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​