...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Rosiclare

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has suffered from dog bite injuries in Rosiclare, Carlson Bier should be your first call. As leading personal injury lawyers, we specialize in handling cases involving animal attacks and have the necessary expertise to ensure justice is served swiftly. Dog bites can lead to serious consequences including infections, emotional trauma, and long-lasting physical damage which requires costly medical treatment. We understand the gravity of the situation in these difficult times; our legal team is proficient at navigating Illinois law to seek maximum compensation for your pain suffering and losses incurred through aggressive negotiation or litigation if needed. Further, Carlson Bier stands out with its deep-rooted commitment towards maintaining client confidentiality which reinforces trust amid our clientele who value discretion highly. With Carlton Bier on your side during tough times like handling repercussions of dog-bite incidents encountered within Rosiclare boundaries – worry less about complicated legal procedures and focus more on recovery as we take care of everything else so you get what’s rightfully yours.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Rosiclare Illinois

When it comes to Dog Bite Injuries, Carlson Bier is a devoted personal injury law firm in Illinois with proven professional expertise. With highly skilled attorneys on our team, we understand the physical and emotional trauma that this sudden and violent event can bring about for victims. Aggressive dogs can be frightening, but equally alarming are the potential extensive medical complications and legal implications following such an attack.

Dog bite injuries often result in substantial pain and suffering. Physical damages such as lacerations, puncture wounds, tissue loss or disfigurement may need immediate emergency responses followed by complex corrective surgeries. Psychological ramifications like post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) might necessitate therapeutic interventions further escalating your healthcare costs.

• Emergency treatment charges

• Cost of surgery and rehabilitation

• Mental health treatments

Apart from these direct expenses associated with dog bites, there are financial losses through missed wages due to hospitalization or recovery process off-work. You also have the undeniable right to seek compensation for the non-economic impacts influencing your quality of life regarding pain-suffering endured or daily life’s impairments.

At Carlson Bier, we stand ready to guide you at every step towards justice – starting with understanding local laws related to dog attacks:

Illinois adopts a ‘strict liability’ rule wherein the pet’s owner becomes responsible for any unprovoked attack caused on public property where the victim is legally present unless proven otherwise.

The relevant Municipal Code includes stringent specifications addressing situations including leashed dogs attacking outside their property bounds.

Limited exceptions include provocation/self-defence instances protecting owners from being held liable for their pets attacking people illegally present on private premises without consent.

All injuries must be reported within 24 hours else suffer fines/incremental penalties so determined by established city codes.

Mastering these guidelines highlights the importance of hiring proficient legal representation well-versed in litigating personal injury claims arising out of animal assaults.

At Carlson Bier, we focus on establishing that the attack occurred in a public place, or while lawfully in a private setting, was unprovoked and resulted in physical harm. Additionally, our attorneys carefully evaluate your situation to determine if it falls within purview of the law.

Deftly navigating these legal nuances requires formidable expertise widely recognized throughout Illinois possessed by Carlson Bier attorneys. We help you prepare robust damage claims accounting for all injury aspects namely economic losses like medical costs/lost wages; non-economic damages quantifying mental anguish suffered; future expense heads covering prospective medical treatments, lost earnings potentials considering lasting impairments affecting work capabilities among others.

So how do you embark on this legal sojourn demanding fair reparations commensurate with your adversity? Process is outlined below:

• Initiate investigation for gathering evidence – Collection of witness statements, images/videos portraying injuries sustained

• Drafting demand letters incorporating entire claim details articulated persuasively ensuring factually/scientifically solid arguments balancing emotional appeals.

• Negotiating settlements where we advocate aggressively seeking just compensation that reflects the true scope of trauma undergone

• If negotiations are appearing less than satisfactory, going to trial becomes next step where we fearlessly represent your cause before court room litigation

At Carlson Bier, you can be assured of personalized attention from dedicated professionals who will fight tirelessly for justice in your favor – thereby making every effort possible towards restoring normalcy back into your life.

Only one crucial action remains pending now from your end: Click on the button below NOW! You have much to gain as you find out how much exactly your case is worth – marking an important beginning towards reclaiming control over disrupted life paths post-dog attack injuries endured.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Rosiclare Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Rosiclare

Areas of Practice in Rosiclare

Cycling Accidents

Focused on legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Giving expert legal assistance for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Healthcare Incompetence

Extending experienced legal support for patients affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Liability

Handling cases involving unsafe products, supplying expert legal support to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Abuse

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Fall Occurrences

Expert in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking recovery for their losses.

Childbirth Harms

Supplying legal guidance for households affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Accidents: Focused on assisting patients of car accidents gain fair recompense for wounds and destruction.

Motorbike Accidents

Dedicated to providing representation for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Truck Accident

Extending expert legal assistance for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for damages.

Worksite Incidents

Engaged in supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Brain Impairments

Expert in providing expert legal services for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Traumas

Skilled in addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Collisions

Focused on legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unfair Death

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and skilled legal support to ensure fairness.

Neural Harm

Focused on assisting victims with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​