FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Rosiclare

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or your loved one resides in Rosiclare and is seeking unrivaled legal representation for spinal cord injuries, Carlson Bier should be your top consideration. We are a distinguished personal injury law firm specializing in spinal cord injuries cases. Over the years, our seasoned attorneys have demonstrated robust advocacy for victims of catastrophic spinal cord injuries, securing much-deserved compensations. Our team recognizes the life-altering effects these injuries have on victims: physical discomfort, emotional distress, financial implications arising from medical bills and loss of income during recovery periods. You can entrust us at Carlson Bier to meticulously evaluate every detail surrounding your incident to create a compelling case that guarantees fair compensation or more. Your path towards justice begins with us; we provide comprehensive legal counsel intended to lessen this traumatic period’s hardship by ensuring all responsible parties are held accountable without compromise resonating professional excellence beyond borders—even into Rosiclare.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Rosiclare Illinois

At Carlson Bier, an established personal injury law firm in Illinois, we make it our mission to advocate for individuals who have experienced life-altering injuries such as spinal cord damage. This dedication stems not just from our excellence in handling claims but also from the understanding that every person seeking our help is grappling with significant physical, emotional, and financial challenges. When you reach out to us, rest assured you will be met with unparalleled legal support coupled with compassionate care.

Spinal cord injuries are typically a result of accidents or trauma which cause damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves at the end of the spinal canal. These can lead to permanent changes in strength, sensation, and other body functions below the site of injury. Complications might also include difficulties with breathing and bladder control.

When dealing with these issues, one thing becomes crystal clear: medical costs alone can leave anyone financially crippled beyond recognition. That’s where we come in; at Carlson Bier team goes above and beyond for clients suffering from such predicaments by fighting tooth and nail against insurance companies refusing rightful compensation.

• Ensuring appropriate compensation: We make sure you get full reimbursement not only for your hospital visits but all future medical expenses resulting from your accident.

• Demanding Loss of Earnings: Any income loss due to your inability to work post-accident comes under this category.

• Claiming Pain & Suffering damages: Coping up physically as well as mentally after an accident qualifies you for remuneration.

An important aspect is that victims need not go through this ordeal alone; our firm presents a united front throughout each step of your case’s progression – right from initial consultation down to decision time whether that concludes inside or outside courtrooms.

Our lawyers are profoundly familiar with technicalities surrounding spinal cord injuries cases considering their experience across a multitude of successful lawsuits. They fully grasp how the law coordinates with medical terminology involved henceforth ensuring accurate representation in court.

At Carlson Bier, we are credited not just for our stellar achievements but also because of the manner in which they were obtained. Each client is seen as a unique individual – not just another case file. New clients are often pleasantly surprised to discover attorneys who are truly interested in their best interests rather than solely turning over cases.

Empathy might not be written anywhere into law books, but it forms the core value at Carlson Bier. We’re an ally on your side helping you cope with this adversity while shouldering legal responsibilities so you can focus on recovery instead of paperwork.

In spite of Illinois being home to some predatory advertising by lawyers declaring how they’ll get you maximum compensation, such hollow promises should always be taken with a pinch of skepticism. Here at Carlson Bier, we rely strictly adhering to codes of practice by never making unrealistic claims or engaging in false advertising about fake office locations across the state – two decidedly unethical practices prevalent today

To conclude, if you have experienced a spinal cord injury due to an accident and need experienced legal counsel who prioritizes your needs above all else, then connect with us today and explore how we may assist. Simply click below to gather more details regarding what your case potentially holds for you financially.

As reviews from our numerous satisfied clients will vouch – At Carlson Bier firm achieving justice isn’t merely a profession – it’s our calling. We invite you to share your story with us and witness firsthand how we stand tall against atrocities meted out towards innocent victims like yourself.

So why wait? Click on ‘Find Out More’ below and gain insights into what lies ahead for your case journey down the path towards justice together undeniable restitution!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Rosiclare Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Rosiclare

Areas of Practice in Rosiclare

Cycling Mishaps

Proficient in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Fire Traumas

Providing expert legal services for patients of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Delivering experienced legal advice for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Accountability

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, extending specialist legal support to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble and Trip Occurrences

Specialist in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking justice for their damages.

Childbirth Traumas

Offering legal help for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Crashes: Concentrated on assisting patients of car accidents receive appropriate compensation for damages and destruction.

Motorbike Accidents

Committed to providing legal services for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Trucking Collision

Delivering professional legal services for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for damages.

Worksite Incidents

Engaged in representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Neurological Impairments

Dedicated to offering expert legal support for victims suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Traumas

Adept at managing cases for people who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Wrongful Death

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and experienced legal representation to ensure redress.

Backbone Impairment

Committed to defending clients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​