...

Bicycle Accidents in Rossville

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve been involved in a bicycle accident, it’s crucial to seek representation from a seasoned law firm that understands the intricacies surrounding such cases. Carlson Bier is an established personal injury lawyer group with profound knowledge and experience in handling Bicycle Accidents compensation claims throughout Illinois including Rossville. Our attorneys comprehend how devastating these accidents can be hence are committed to advocating for your rights efficiently and diligently while easing down this challenging moment for you. We offer exemplary representation, focusing on securing full compensation that mirrors the gravity of any physical harm or emotional distress incurred due to negligent parties. Compassionate yet aggressive, we meticulously analyze the unique circumstances surrounding each case using our deep-rooted expertise; working towards obtaining optimum results for our clients without unnecessary delays. Trust us – choose Carlson Bier as your preferred legal aid when confronted with Bicycle Accident issues – because at Carlson Bier no case is too small or too complex…..your recovery begins here!

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Rossville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in championing the rights of personal injury victims, notably those involved in bicycle accidents. As an Illinois-based law firm, we have significant experience working within the state’s legal framework and offer incisive analysis when dealing with claims tied to such incidents.

Cycling has become increasingly popular across many cities and towns throughout Illinois due to both its health benefits and convenience. However, as greater numbers take to the streets on bicycles, instances of traffic-related bicycle injuries are also seeing an uptick. It’s important for individuals involved in these scenarios to realize the options they hold legally.

One main thing to note is that most bicycle accident cases fall under personal injury laws. Our team at Carlson Bier assists you by navigating through the complexities of these laws while ensuring your interests remain safeguarded at all times.

Bicycle accident litigation can encompass a wide array of scenarios:

• Accidents caused by motorist negligence or misconduct

• Accidents stemming from infrastructure lapses such as faulty bike lanes or poorly maintained roads

• Collisions involving multiple cyclists

What sets bicycle accident cases apart from generic automobile collision cases is their unique cause-effect relationships. Cyclists usually suffer more severe injuries than motorists due to their comparative vulnerability on roadways.

It’s critical that victims leverage our expertise promptly following a cycling accident for several reasons:

• Establishing fault timely: Many states employ contributory negligence rules—even if slightly at fault, collectable damages may shrink drastically.

• Timeliness damages assessment: Medical expenses, wage losses along with associated inconveniences necessitate accurate damage assessment for just compensation.

• Leveraging swift investigative measures: Quick action post-accident helps preserve evidence necessary for building robust case arguments.

Additionally, it is imperative to remember that according to Illinois law stipulations concerning statute limitations on filing personal injury lawsuits are strictly enforced—a two-year window from date-of-injury decreases daily after the incident occurs which signifies the importance of time.

At Carlson Bier, we offer expertise and knowledge to help you traverse these challenging circumstances. Our understanding regarding medical considerations associated with cycling injuries means we do not just focus on the legal aspects but also demonstrate profound empathy – an added comfort in an otherwise stressful period for victims and their families.

Lastly, one significant benefit our potential clients glean from is our free case evaluations service. This tool offers a confidential appraisal concerning your circumstances allowing you thorough insight into your claim’s likely outcome without any commitment or cost implication.

We understand pursuing litigation may seem daunting amid dealing with repercussions of severe injuries. However, knowing what’s possible can make all the difference – taking that essential first step could provide peace of mind for you and your loved ones through decisive legal action on your behalf.

Click on the button below today—the sooner you get started, the faster resolution and potential compensation becomes achievable. Finding out just how much worth attaches to your case might surprise you—it’s only a simple click away!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Rossville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Rossville

Areas of Practice in Rossville

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Fire Damages

Offering expert legal advice for patients of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Misconduct

Offering specialist legal services for persons affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Responsibility

Addressing cases involving problematic products, providing adept legal help to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Fall Occurrences

Skilled in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking restitution for their damages.

Childbirth Wounds

Supplying legal aid for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Crashes

Crashes: Committed to assisting victims of car accidents gain reasonable payout for injuries and impairment.

Bike Incidents

Expert in providing representation for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Truck Accident

Delivering professional legal representation for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for hurts.

Construction Site Incidents

Engaged in supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Cognitive Impairments

Focused on offering compassionate legal services for victims suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Injuries

Proficient in handling cases for people who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Expert in legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Demise

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and professional legal representation to ensure fairness.

Neural Injury

Focused on representing victims with paralysis, offering specialized legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer