...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in Round Lake Park

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, we understand the intricacies of bicycle accidents, having fought numerous battles for justice in this area. Stay assured that our accomplished team is dedicated to providing top-tier legal services tailored specifically towards the needs of cyclists involved in unfortunate incidents. Our wealth of experience and a strong track record reflect our deep commitment to assisting even when the odds seem insurmountable. Par excellence trial skills set us apart; regardless if it’s disputing insurance claims or confronting negligent parties, at Carlson Bier we tackle every case with relentless resilience and unparalleled legal acumen. We ardently believe that every cyclist deserves just compensation for their injury-caused anguish or property damages sustained through no fault of their own interim roams on Round Lake Park’s taciturn streets or its serene environs beyond. With a powerful blend of empathy and expertise, we help you navigate through these crises ensuring your rights are preserved while relentlessly working towards achieving handsome settlements in acknowledgment your ordeal following a bicycle accident.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Round Lake Park Illinois

Carlson Bier, one of the highly renowned personal injury law firms in Illinois, seeks to arm its clients with invaluable insights on the complex issue of bicycle accidents. Understanding your rights and potential compensation as a result of such an incident can prove pivotal during litigation.

Bicycle accidents often strike with little warning, significantly impacting victims’ lives by causing injuries ranging from minor scratches to severe fractures and traumatic brain injuries. These distressing events can swiftly turn your life topsy-turvy; leaving you grappling with impending medical bills, lost income due to time off work or potentially permanent disabilities that disrupt your daily routine.

– Primarily, it is crucial for all bicyclists to understand that they have the same rights as drivers when using public roadways. Ignorance about this fact has led many injured cyclists down complicated legal corridors.

– One important consideration involves statute limitations regarding these cases within Illinois. Victims must file their claim within two years from the accident date—an overlooked yet vital detail for any successful resolution.

– In circumstances where hit-and-run drivers are involved or the at-fault party lacks insurance coverage, uninsured motorist (UM) policies come into play. As daunting as it might seem now, knowing if UM coverage extends to biking incidents under Illinois law can make all the difference in securing fair compensation.

Growing awareness about fault determination in bicycle accidents also takes precedence since Illinois follows comparative negligence laws which effectively consider each parties’ degree of culpability before deciding final allotments. If you were partly responsible for your accident (maybe not wearing safety gear), rest assured Carlson Bier attorneys would fully explore ways such contributory negligence might affect your overall case outcome.

Additionally, understanding safe biking practices plays a significant role in mitigating future incidents—knowledgeable compliance with traffic laws, use of reflectors/tail lights/headlights for nighttime riding increases visibility thus reducing risks dramatically.

This overview barely scratches complexities behind bicycle accident personal injury lawsuits within Illinois; negotiations and courtroom battles alike demand seasoned representation guided by practical experience, a tireless commitment to justice, and strategic application of pertinent statutes. The team at Carlson Bier perfectly fits that bill.

Aiming for ultimate client satisfaction, we remain empathetic towards your predicament during these challenging times—providing needed emotional support while analyzing case details meticulously, strategizing intelligently, negotiating assertively when opportunities arise or resorting to fierce courtroom warfare should negotiations stall. Either way, you can rest assured knowing our primary focus remains securing the maximum compensation possible for your losses—whether medical bills (past and future), lost wages/income (now and later), pain/suffering plus other applicable damages as appropriate under Illinois laws.

At Carlson Bier, we engage with clients on a contingency basis—you only pay if you win which infuses us with unrelenting motivation to secure positive outcomes always. Appreciating how murky legal waters can initially seem overwhelming, let’s dissect each element together gradually ensuring clarity prevails throughout our journey towards justice—together!

So why wait any longer? Click on the link below now! Discover how potentially life-altering a successful bicycle accident lawsuit claim could turn out—the tentative figure might pleasantly surprise after all. Tasked with protecting your rights and winning deserved compensation after such traumatic incidents—that’s what drives your dedicated personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier every single day—day in day out. Let’s get started right away unraveling this puzzle … calculate exactly how much YOUR case is worth NOW!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Round Lake Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Round Lake Park

Areas of Practice in Round Lake Park

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Specializing in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or risky conditions.

Scald Traumas

Offering adept legal services for individuals of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Hospital Carelessness

Offering specialist legal support for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Accountability

Addressing cases involving faulty products, offering specialist legal guidance to victims affected by defective items.

Geriatric Abuse

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Trip Mishaps

Specialist in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking recovery for their losses.

Newborn Damages

Offering legal support for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Crashes: Committed to supporting clients of car accidents secure reasonable settlement for damages and destruction.

Motorcycle Collisions

Expert in providing legal services for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Trucking Accident

Ensuring experienced legal representation for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for hurts.

Construction Accidents

Committed to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cognitive Harms

Committed to extending specialized legal advice for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Damages

Expertise in addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unfair Passing

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and professional legal support to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Injury

Dedicated to representing individuals with paralysis, offering expert legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​