FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Roxana

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the wake of a distressing dog bite injury, having expert legal representation is crucial. The acclaimed law firm Carlson Bier has championed significant victories for this specific type of personal injury case across Illinois. Their proficiency in investigating and litigating dog bite incidents provides victims with an unparalleled advantage to secure maximum compensation for their injuries, lost wages, pain and suffering. More than just lawyers, the compassionate team at Carlson Bier understands that these encounters can be emotionally traumatic; your wellbeing is their priority while they aggressively work on your behalf against insurance companies or negligent pet owners. For residents of Roxana seeking assistance after a canine-inflicted incident – or those in surrounding regions alike— connect with Carlson Bier today! Recognized as formidable advocates in resolution-seeking when you’re left battling against everything from physical scarring to emotional trauma post-dog bite attack; trust them to be your voice in times where strength seems impossible to summon.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Roxana Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we’re dedicated to empowering victims of personal injury incidents with crucial knowledge that can aid them on their path to justice. Today, we’re turning our attention towards a prevalent yet often overlooked area of personal injury law: Dog Bite Injuries. As experienced personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our sterling track record demonstrates steadfast dedication to advocating for the rights of dog bite victims.

Dog attacks are frightening incidents that can lead not just to physical harm but also deep psychological trauma. Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes down to dog bites, meaning an owner could be held responsible for injuries caused by their pets without demonstrating negligence or lack thereof on their part. This could provide grounds for a solid claim if you’ve been bitten; understanding your rights at such times becomes indispensable.

Here are some pivotal aspects associated with this subject matter:

Firstly, medical expenses may skyrocket as a result of immediate treatments and long-term care following serious dog bite incidences. As victim, you have every right to seek compensation covering these costs in full.

Secondly, if the attack leads toward significant pain or scarring – either physically or psychologically – you may potentially qualify for awards concerning pain and suffering depending upon the severity and longevity of these symptoms.

Lastly, while wages lost due to recovery times aren’t usually considered substantial evidence alone for high-value settlements; they absolutely form part of larger holistic claims combining all damages together including those related to emotional distress or loss of consortium (relationships).

It’s important also understand how best preserve crucial evidence over time post-incident ensuring success during legal proceedings. Preserving physical evidences like torn clothing, bloody items; documenting injuries through photographs; keeping precise records about medical check-ups etc.; noting down contact details witnesses present during incident will greatly boost your case’s solidity.

Remember: Time is essential! In Illinois – victims have two years from date incident occurs file suit against owners involved…missed deadlines could seriously jeopardize your opportunity for compensation. Thus, enlisting help of experienced personal injury attorney like us right from inception should be considered as prime importance.

You must never be forced to shoulder the burden of a canine’s violent behavior alone or silently bear the lingering effects thereof on account of someone else’s irresponsibility.

Here at Carlson Bier, we commit ourselves towards seeking justice on behalf of those who’ve suffered physical and emotional harm via dog attacks. Our team pulls out all stops; utilizing wealth knowledge combined with far-reaching experience build robust case allowing you secure fair compensation deserving.

Encourage you to click the button below to find out how much your case might be potentially worth in monetary terms; empower yourself today through valuable information that sets stage for tomorrow’s victories – because courage, after all, is knowing what not to fear.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Roxana Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Roxana

Areas of Practice in Roxana

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Proficient in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Offering adept legal services for patients of intense burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Healthcare Misconduct

Providing expert legal representation for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Accountability

Taking on cases involving faulty products, supplying specialist legal assistance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Senior Neglect

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall and Tumble Occurrences

Expert in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking justice for their harm.

Birth Injuries

Offering legal support for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Accidents: Dedicated to supporting sufferers of car accidents get equitable compensation for harms and losses.

Motorbike Incidents

Focused on providing representation for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Semi Accident

Offering expert legal representation for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for injuries.

Building Accidents

Concentrated on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Brain Damages

Specializing in offering specialized legal support for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Adept at managing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from dog bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and professional legal representation to ensure compensation.

Backbone Harm

Dedicated to defending patients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal services to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​