FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Saint Charles

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with dog bite injuries in Saint Charles, the proficient expertise of Carlson Bier provides invaluable legal guidance. Our team understands the intricacies of Illinois’ personal injury law and will diligently work to ensure you receive appropriate compensation for your distress. Dealing with medical bills and trauma can be overwhelming; that’s why we are committed to shouldering the burdensome legal processes for you. We push hard against insurance companies attempting to undercut rightful claims and bring years of experience into every case we handle. Compassionate yet aggressive, we serve clients touched by incidents involving biting dogs with fervor uncommon in our field. At Carlson Bier, we prioritize your well-being above everything else, devoting our resources towards crafting a compelling case tailored specifically to your unique scenario. If you’re seeking justice handling dog bite injuries within Saint Charles or its surrounding area, trust Carlson Bier as it flourishes as one of Illinois’ strongest defenders in this sector of personal injury law.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Saint Charles Illinois

Understanding the complexities of Dog Bite Injuries can be daunting, especially when you’re going through the physical and emotional trauma associated with such an unfortunate incident. Carlson Bier, a reputed Personal Injury law firm based in Illinois, is here to guide you through this challenging period with our knowledge, expertise, and unwavering dedication.

Dog bites may seem like straightforward personal injury cases, but they demand thorough legal navigation coupled with a solid understanding of the local laws involved. As experienced attorneys specializing in Dog Bite Injuries, we know that it’s more than about just filing a claim; it’s about seeking justice for your pain and suffering while ensuring that necessary measures are taken to prevent future incidents from happening again.

• A key element in dog bite injury cases is establishing liability- if the dog owner was aware or should have been aware of their pet’s aggressive tendencies.

• Compensation options can vary widely depending on individual circumstances. It might include monetary compensation for medical expenses or even psychological counseling required after severe dog attacks.

• The severity of injuries also plays a significant role – Scars or disfigurements due to bites can warrant substantial settlements.

Our extensive understanding of Illinois’ unique ‘One-Bite Rule,’ as well as related local statutes, set us apart. This principle states that if an owner knew their pet had bitten someone before or shown signs of aggression/propensity to harm others – they would be strictly liable for any damages caused by future bites. Understanding such nuanced rules is imperative and where we bring immense value to our clients distressed by such unexpected events.

The Carlson Bier Group offers comprehensive guidance with respect to the following:

• Gathering Evidence: Photos of your injuries & place where incident occurred could significantly strength your case

• Medical Records: These are crucial not just for documenting the extent and impact of injuries suffered but also for substantiating demands for compensation.

• Witness Statements: If there were witnesses present during the event – getting factual statements from them can be very helpful in strengthening your claim.

• Dog’s History: Knowledge about the dog’s previous aggressive behavior or any prior incidents of causing harm can further bolster your case.

When you choose to work with Carlson Bier, you are choosing an accredited partner that focuses entirely on personal injury law. We appreciate the trust placed in us by our clients and reciprocate it by delivering outstanding service that brings soothing relief to a situation already laden with stress.

In Illinois, where we have our principal office, statutes stipulate when you should file a lawsuit for a dog bite. The two-year statute of limitations requires victims to bring their lawsuit within this period from the date of suffering injuries due to a dog bite. This time frame is crucial as delaying taking action may bar you completely from pursuing legal remedies against those liable. Guiding you through such technicalities is part of what we do best at Carlson Bier.

At Carlson Bier, every case is treated with focused dedication and meticulous attention – ensuring all critical elements receive warranted consideration and proper redressal. We believe that every victim deserves rightful compensation for unfolding traumatic experiences evoke extraordinary circumstances requiring empathetic understanding coupled with staunch legal support – which we promise to deliver unfailingly.

We understand how overwhelming it can get navigating through recovering from injuries while also dealing with insurance companies and legal matters simultaneously. Let us bear that burden for you; join hands with Carlsons Bier- A dedicated team of experienced Personal Injury Attorneys committed untiringly towards getting justice earned rightfully!

Remember, timely action is essential if seeking compensation for these unfortunate events. Start today by clicking on the button below, wherein lies your first step in finding out how much your case might be worth – remember, at Carlson Bier; not even once will any committed effort go staged freely towards seeking deserved justice!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Saint Charles Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Saint Charles

Areas of Practice in Saint Charles

Cycling Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Burn Burns

Providing specialist legal help for patients of serious burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing experienced legal services for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Fault

Managing cases involving faulty products, extending specialist legal services to clients affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Fall Mishaps

Specialist in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking recovery for their damages.

Newborn Harms

Extending legal assistance for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Accidents: Focused on guiding victims of car accidents obtain fair payout for harms and losses.

Bike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

18-Wheeler Incident

Extending specialist legal advice for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just claims for losses.

Building Site Mishaps

Engaged in advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Brain Harms

Committed to offering professional legal representation for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Wounds

Adept at dealing with cases for people who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Expert in legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Fatality

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and professional legal representation to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Focused on representing clients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​