Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Saint Charles

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re a pedestrian involved in an accident, your rights and interests should be aggressively protected. Carlson Bier has the expertise and commitment to stand by you during these trying times. As a leading personal injury law firm based in Illinois, our team specializes in pedestrian accident cases assuring comprehensive legal support that translates into positive outcomes for our clients.

We proudly serve victims of pedestrian accidents irrespective of location within the state which includes Saint Charles – where we’re determined to make every case count. In addition to understanding local regulations affecting each claimant’s specific circumstance, we have deep knowledge about state laws guiding overall compensation claims.

Choosing Carlson Bier ensures relentless representation and personalized attention tailored towards individual client needs including evaluation of medical records, liaising with insurance companies or representing at trial if necessary. Our track record evidences considerable successful lawsuit settlements ensuring maximum financial returns for clients while they focus on recuperation following any unfortunate incident.

With Carlson Bier as your Pedestrian Accident attorney group, reclaiming control over your life becomes decidedly achievable because seeking justice isn’t just what we do; it pervades who we are!

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Saint Charles Illinois

At the esteemed law firm of Carlson Bier, we take pride in advocating for those injured due to another’s negligence – and this includes unfortunate victims of pedestrian accidents. If you or a loved one has been involved in such an incident, it’s crucially important to understand your rights and how Illinois law can protect you. Our accomplished team of personal injury lawyers is fully dedicated to enlightening you on these matters while providing comprehensive legal services.

Pedestrian accidents often result in severe physical injuries, as pedestrians are devoid of any protective structures compared to drivers within their vehicles. Common injuries include fractures, internal injuries, spinal cord damage, traumatic brain injury among others.

• These incidents are predominantly caused by reckless driving which compromises following traffic laws such as failing to yield at crosswalks or ignoring traffic signals.

• Distracted driving also plays a significant role in pedestrian accidents with drivers either texting while on the wheel or being otherwise distracted resulting in failure to observe people crossing streets/sidewalks.

• Driving under influence and speeding equally attribute significantly towards pedestrian accident cases. At high speeds even if the driver spots the pedestrian they often fail to react quickly enough causing devastating repercussions.

In these events, our legal experts meticulously analyze each case’s specifics, helping identify accountable parties and fiercely representing clients’ pursuit for justified compensation. This could be from insurance companies who hold policies with accused parties or from negligent individuals themselves when insurance doesn’t adequately cover damages.

But why should you consider making that claim? Pedestrian accident injuries can be life-altering leading not only to physical trauma but emotional anguish too along with costly medical debts. Understandably recovering lost wages from time away at work is crucial just as much as seeking remuneration for pain and suffering endured.. Out-of-pocket expenses like therapy costs post-recovery phase may additionally pile up burdening families further depending upon severity of sustained injuries.

It’s noteworthy that proving fault qualifies as obligatory for successful resolution of such personal injury cases. In Illinois particularly, the ‘comparative fault’ rule applies wherein you can still claim recovery even if partially at fault – with damages being lessened relatively, based on your amount of blame.

In Carlson Bier we ascertain to build strong arguments that validate our clients were lesser or not at all responsible in accidents ensuring maximum possible restitution. This includes methodically examining accident scenes, interviewing witnesses and utilizing consultants such as Accident reconstruction experts.

Furthermore, it must be highlighted that there remains a time limitation to file such lawsuits known legally as the statute of limitations. In most incidents in Illinois, this extends to two years post-accident highlighting each day’s importance post-incident in reaching out for accomplished legal counsel to champion your cause.

Retaining an experienced pedestrian accident lawyer from Carlson Bier amplifies chances of gaining fair compensation while granting peace amidst tumultuous times. Our team handles all administrative tasks like filing paperwork within guided deadlines so victims can concentrate fully on their road towards recovery rather than worrying about lurking legal enigma.

Being well-aware of increasing need for effective online communication means in present times we unhesitatingly offer confidential online consultations facilitating easy discussions about potential personal injury claims irrespective of physical boundaries. Reliability and expeditiousness stand atop our core values when representing pedestrian accident victims as we constantly strive bringing justice for sufferers by ensuring impactful outcomes where you are rightfully recompensed addressing injuries inflicted due to another’s negligence undoubtedly.

We invite you now to make use of technology advancing forward supporting victim advocacy through telecom developments – Click on the link below providing details regarding your case scenario which will assist us assess its worth providing initial insight into the range of monetary value associated with your claim thus letting us take a step closer towards winning just restitution serving your best interest undeterredly!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Saint Charles Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Saint Charles

Areas of Practice in Saint Charles

Bicycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Damages

Providing professional legal support for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Physician Misconduct

Delivering expert legal representation for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Liability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, supplying specialist legal assistance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Neglect

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Slip Mishaps

Skilled in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking justice for their damages.

Childbirth Traumas

Providing legal help for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Crashes

Collisions: Committed to aiding victims of car accidents get reasonable remuneration for wounds and losses.

Motorcycle Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Trucking Crash

Providing adept legal support for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for hurts.

Building Mishaps

Concentrated on supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Head Harms

Focused on extending compassionate legal advice for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Wounds

Specialized in managing cases for victims who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Wrongful Loss

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and professional legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Injury

Expert in representing clients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer