Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Saint Francisville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve been involved in a pedestrian accident, the choice of your legal representation is pivotal. Trust Carlson Bier – an expert team of dedicated personal injury lawyers who prioritize the recovery and rights of their clients regardless of where they reside. With deep understanding and vast experience handling pedestrian accident-related cases, our attorneys are equipped to handle even the most complex situations. They strive hard to ensure that victims receive appropriate compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain & suffering while comprehending each case’s distinctive nuances intricately related to Illinois law terms. Working with us establishes a link with informed advocates well-versed at interpreting intricate details invoked by such mishaps – ensuring justice isn’t just served but well-served! Delivering results rather than mere promises being our aim; choosing Carlson Bier tag teams you with relentless workers aiming at making this unfortunate event bearable through all means possible within their capability! So remember when considering Pedestrian Accident lawyers: consider Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Saint Francisville Illinois

As one of Illinois’ established personal injury law firms, Carlson Bier has strived to assert the rights and interests of pedestrian accident victims for several years. We recognize that every injury case differs significantly in its circumstances and severity, hence our commitment to handling each lawsuit with legal acumen honed over decades of practice. Pedestrian accidents often take place due to an assortment of reasons where negligence plays a role – obstructed pathways, unmarked crosswalks, distracted drivers, faulty traffic signals among others. As personal injury attorneys based out in Illinois we provide a reliable opportunity for justice.

Pedestrian accidents result not only in bodily harm but significant financial strain inflicted by medical expenses and loss of employment during recovery. These are commonly categorized as compensatory damages which aim at reimbursing the victim for economic losses incurred due to the mishap. The intricacies involved in calculating these costs necessitate expertise from seasoned personal injury lawyers like us at Carlson Bier who can demonstrate tangible evidence supporting your claim.

• Calculation Of Losses: Our team meticulously computes all related expenses merging burgeoning medical bills along with potential future treatment costs.

• Assessing Non-economic Damages: In addition to financial losses, non-economic damages such as pain & suffering contribute largely to compensation claims.

Our deep-rooted understanding facilitates negotiating effectively on behalf of our clients thus maximizing their settlement prospects where possible.The possibility that you may have been partially or entirely responsible doesn’t necessarily eliminate your eligibility for compensation since Illinois adheres to the modified comparative negligence system.It allows injured pedestrians compensated even if they were 50% or less at faulturingly with insurance companies post-accident becomes an uphill task demanding both time and patience fuelled additionally with appropriate legal arguments.Carlson Bier excels in handling insurers advocating fervently for our clients ensuring them fair settlements.Evidence gathering is crucial post-injury wherein obvious pieces miss out creating discrepancies later.Our professional approach towards preserving and analyzing evidence rigorously is at the heart of our representation.

• Photography: we strategize by capturing quality photos of your physical injuries, accident scene including any vehicle damage associated.

• Witness Testimony: if available, witness statements offered can bear significant weight in terms of support for your case.

• Expert Testimonies: Our network within the medical community allows us to consult professionals who can corroborate on injuries and their potential impact.

Our proactive steps mooted have led to strengthened client cases ensuring plausibility during an eventual trial.Committedly navigating through legal prerequisites post-accident feels overwhelming without erudite legal counsel.Carlson Bier takes pride in creating a seamless experience for every pedestrian accident victim fighting relentlessly whilst leveraging maximum damages on their behalf.We acknowledge that no amount replaces the mental or emotional turmoil caused however securing compensation eases financial burden significantly hence permitting you to focus on recovery.Our mission steers towards restoring quality within our clients’ lives compassionately paired along with professionalism thus skillfully crafting every individual claim progressing towards positive outcomesWe welcome you to discover more about how Carlson Bier personal injury attorneys based out in Illinois can aid in determining the true worth attached to your case.Click on the button below facilitating us understand details intricately bound with sensitivity aware how pivotal this moment could be upon moving forward after enduring such extraordinary circumstances.You matter & we genuinely care! Allow us to address your worries, answer queries you have while outlining diverse possibilities existing under personal injury law..

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Saint Francisville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Saint Francisville

Areas of Practice in Saint Francisville

Cycling Accidents

Focused on legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Providing specialist legal advice for victims of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Healthcare Incompetence

Providing experienced legal support for patients affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Liability

Addressing cases involving defective products, supplying skilled legal guidance to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Aged Misconduct

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip and Tumble Occurrences

Specialist in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking restitution for their injuries.

Newborn Injuries

Extending legal help for households affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Accidents: Dedicated to assisting victims of car accidents obtain reasonable compensation for hurts and destruction.

Scooter Crashes

Dedicated to providing representation for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Trucking Accident

Offering professional legal representation for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for injuries.

Worksite Mishaps

Focused on advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Neurological Injuries

Specializing in extending specialized legal representation for victims suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Adept at dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered damages from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Committed to legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Loss

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and skilled legal services to ensure compensation.

Spine Injury

Specializing in assisting persons with backbone trauma, offering professional legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer