Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Saint Jacob

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering a dog bite injury can be an overwhelming experience. Amidst the pain and damage, turning to competent legal support is of utmost importance. Carlson Bier beautifully understands this need. Based in Illinois, we extend our top-notch personal injury attorney services beyond our geographic boundaries to assist those affected by dog bite injuries in Saint Jacob and other locations statewide. Our skilled attorneys painstakingly evaluate every case’s distinct details, ensuring you receive maximum compensation for your pain, mental trauma, medical bills, lost wages and all related damages inflicted by such horrific encounters with dogs. We stand out due to our profound commitment to justice served – swiftly and fully – delivered right at your doorstep without any regional constraints that could hinder our progress or service delivery quality.Determined yet empathetic; diligent yet patient; fierce advocates when needed: Carlson Bier embodies these traits rendering us invaluable allies in your quest for compensation following a traumatic dog incident.Call on us today!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Saint Jacob Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the distressing impact a dog bite injury can have on an individual. As experienced personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our driving force is to diligently fight for your right to fair compensation when such traumatic experiences occur. Dog bite injuries can often lead to severe physical damage and emotional trauma, resulting in hefty medical bills and psychological therapy expenses that you should not bear alone.

It is crucial to realize that different elements come into play in cases of dog bite injuries, contributing significantly to every legal decision made. In Illinois, the state law revolves around ‘strict liability’ concerning these accidents. Accordingly, if a dog bites someone without provocation while they are legally allowed on the owner’s property or out in public places including parks and sidewalks, the pet owner can be held liable for any ensuing damages.

However, the intricate legalese surrounding this subject matter might prove intimidating for some individuals. Henceforth, at Carlson Bier, we strive to guide our clients comprehensively by making complex legal concepts more digestible through some specific key points:

– Statute of Limitations: In Illinois, you have a timeline within which you must file a claim – precisely two years from the date of the incident.

– Liability Insurance Coverage: The majority of homeowners’ insurance policies cover liabilities arising from dog bites endured by non-residents on their premises.

For victims suffering from dog bite injuries due to negligence displayed by an individual or institution responsible for controlling their animals under law enforcement ordinances present in county or city legislations; gathering substantial documentary evidence like witness testimonies, medical reports and photographs demonstrating inflicted harm become pertinent towards shaping strong claims incubating high possibilities of prevailing over court proceedings.

Navigating potential aftermaths following these injuries necessitates proficient legal representation familiar with distinguishing components impacting settlements’ outcomes encompassing permanency.Scope severity placing financial strains onto victims falling prey towards rogue aggressive dogs transforming ordinarily vibrant lives twilighted amidst grief-stricken sorrows, permanent incapacitation or debilitating emotional trauma accompanying haunting nightmares resurfacing horror-laden recollections.

As the law in Illinois stipulates that dog owners assume full responsibility for their pets’ conduct sans exceptions, at Carlson Bier we solemnly pledge shielding our esteemed clientele from common consequential pitfalls marring justice’s righteous attainment caused by negligent third parties paving pathways towards irreparable damage compensation.

While no amount of financial compensation can entirely mitigate the torment inflicted by a dog bite injury, obtaining fair recompense eases burdens and ensures you receive necessary care to resume normal life progressively. At Carlson Bier, our dedicated attorneys intend to navigate these turbulent legal waters on your behalf, making sure each case is handled with utmost diligence and compassion.

Every individual experience varies when interacting with aggressive dogs. The impact left behind differs based on multiple factors like age, injuries sustained severity and pre-existing conditions exacerbating deteriorated contexts cultivating grounds inducing hefty expenses contributing towards complete recovery road mapping sustainable recuperation strategies; therefore emphasizing claiming rightful settlements’ importance aligning accurate calculating comprehensive coverage incurrences.

At Carlson Bier, recognizing unique circumstances is central to us. We leave no stone unturned in guarding your right to just reparation following traumatic incidents endured because of lax regulations adherence threatening public safety standards maintenance negligently overlooked warranting severe penalty imposition barring repetition prevalence.

Please remember that time frames for filing personal injury cases involving dog bite injuries are legally bound by strict durations limiting flexible extended deadlines adoption catering last minute incorporations. Therefore it becomes imperative acting promptly post-incident occurrence notifying responsible authorities aiding seamless evidence collection guaranteeing high-quality testimonies provision safeguarding interests becoming material contributions offering decisive arguments furnishing undeniable solid proof

Contemplating pursuing justice through legal means in times of dire distress might seem daunting. However, equipped with comprehensive knowledge translated into actionable steps can make this journey manageable while providing an enhanced understanding of your situation’s complexities requiring deeper perspectives analysis granting an edge over contradicting parties.

To truly discern the worth of your case and the rightful compensation you should seek, Carlson Bier invites you to take advantage of our expertise in this area. Embrace life anew as we deploy our resources to ensure a deserving settlement for you. Click on the button below to unravel pathways significantly shaping dog bite injury claims’ triumphs; let our skilled legal experts guide you towards winning your worthy claim.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Saint Jacob Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Saint Jacob

Areas of Practice in Saint Jacob

Cycling Incidents

Proficient in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Traumas

Providing professional legal advice for victims of intense burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Physician Malpractice

Providing specialist legal advice for persons affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Fault

Managing cases involving unsafe products, providing adept legal guidance to customers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Neglect

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Trip and Trip Injuries

Expert in addressing tumble accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking recovery for their harm.

Childbirth Injuries

Delivering legal support for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Collisions: Committed to aiding sufferers of car accidents gain reasonable recompense for damages and destruction.

Bike Crashes

Specializing in providing legal assistance for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Crash

Ensuring expert legal services for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for damages.

Construction Site Mishaps

Committed to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Brain Harms

Committed to offering compassionate legal representation for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Specialized in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered damages from dog bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unfair Death

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and expert legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Specializing in advocating for victims with spine impairments, offering professional legal representation to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer