Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Saint Libory

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has suffered a spinal cord injury due to negligence, Carlson Bier brings vast experience in handling such personal injury cases. This team of seasoned attorneys specializes in representing clients with spinal cord injuries across Saint Libory area. Their strategic legal action is guided by a deep understanding and empathy that stems from their continued interaction with victims facing life-altering changes due to these injurious events. They advocate aggressively for the rights of their clients while fighting relentlessly for maximum financial compensation whether it’s dealing with insurance companies or taking matters into court over unresolved disputes. A signature element at Carlson Bier is their dedication to providing personalized service – they focus on understanding each individual’s story and care needs as part of determining suitable steps forward economically, legally and emotionally after spinal trauma. The commitment demonstrated by this outstanding group assures top-quality representation for those suffering from traumatic spine injuries near Saint Libory.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Saint Libory Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the life-altering impact a spinal cord injury can have on an individual and their loved ones. As experienced personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our goal is to provide vital support during this challenging time while helping secure the compensation needed for recovery.

A spinal cord injury can result from a variety of incidents, including car accidents, falls, sports-related injuries or acts of violence. The severity often varies from minor bruising to severe trauma leading to paralysis. Regrettably, such devastating injuries can drastically affect one’s quality of life physically, emotionally and financially.

Complex and multifaceted as they are, spinal cord injuries entail extensive medical treatment that can be staggeringly expensive. Associated costs could include hospitalization, rehabilitation therapy, medical equipment like wheelchair ramps or modified vehicles along with care facilities in severe cases. Furthermore, other expenses may emerge due to lost wages if the injured party is unable to work.

• Immediate medical care: Following an accident causing possible spinal cord damage.

• Intensive therapy: Ongoing physical and occupational therapies promote independence.

• Long-term assistance: Lifelong assistance ranging from home adaptations to full-time nursing care.

• Lost income adjustment: To compensate for potential unemployment or underemployment due to disability.

Our commitment at Carlson Bier extends beyond representing you legally; we also strive tirelessly advocating for access to comprehensive healthcare accompanied by financial resources crucial for your long-term welfare.

Understanding these realities prompts us into action when representing clients with spinal cord injuries. To receive rightful compensation covering ongoing and future treatments besides offsetting loss of earnings necessitates strong litigation techniques together with comprehensive knowledge about trauma’s overall impact on an individual’s life – attributes proudly possessed by our dedicated team at Carlson Bier. Our mission has always been ensuring victims’ rights are upheld whilst easing their rehabilitation journey through legal means.

We must emphasize that every case related to personal injury claims involving spinal cord damage comes bearing its unique parameters. Accordingly, the compensation amount varies on a case-by-case basis considering numerous aspects: specific details of the accident or act of negligence that led to the injury, expenses associated with medical treatment and care, plus lost earnings.

We commit to diligently advocating your cause during every step of this legal journey. Our experienced team will profoundly investigate your case, understand its nuances and meticulously prepare it for trial while continuously supporting you through what we know can be an arduous period.

Our seasoned lawyers keep abreast of laws pertinent to spinal cord injuries in Illinois and consistently update their knowledge related to latest treatments and healthcare costs. This diligence aids substantially in negotiating settlements or presenting a compelling argument in court because we ensure no detail is overlooked when projecting current and future costs tied with our client’s ailment.

Don’t let another day pass worrying about how you’re going to endure this unstinting challenge alone – partnering with Carlson Bier offers not only dedicated professional representation but also access to resources aiding rehabilitation needs along with peace-of-mind knowing experts are working around-the-clock championing your rights.

Remember: you are more than just a case number for us; dealing with spinal cord injuries goes beyond litigation – it’s about restoring lives as much as possible despite facing immense struggles.

Every spinal cord injury tells its own story—one riddled with pain but one that also instills resilience while etching hope into human hearts—a conviction we uphold here at Carlson Bier where each client constitutes part of our extended family network. We don’t promise easy victories but pledge undying commitment ensuring deserved justice whilst standing by you till we achieve it.

Take control over your life again, starting from today. Click on the button below—let us collaborate in determining what fair compensation looks like for your unique ordeal while sulfate gleaning insights about how much your case might worth amid these unforeseen circumstances affecting thousands across Illinois annually–you are indeed not alone on this grueling journey. Together, we can help redefine the narrative of your life post spinal cord injury because at Carlson Bier, every case matters and each person has a voice that deserves to be heard profoundly.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Saint Libory Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Saint Libory

Areas of Practice in Saint Libory

Bicycle Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Scald Burns

Providing adept legal help for patients of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Medical Malpractice

Offering expert legal services for persons affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Accountability

Handling cases involving defective products, extending specialist legal support to clients affected by defective items.

Senior Abuse

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Tumble Incidents

Expert in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking compensation for their suffering.

Childbirth Wounds

Extending legal guidance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Incidents: Committed to assisting victims of car accidents obtain fair compensation for wounds and damages.

Motorcycle Collisions

Focused on providing legal support for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Semi Incident

Offering adept legal services for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for injuries.

Construction Site Accidents

Committed to assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Cognitive Injuries

Specializing in ensuring expert legal services for clients suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Proficient in managing cases for people who have suffered wounds from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Dedicated to legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Fatality

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and adept legal support to ensure redress.

Neural Harm

Focused on supporting patients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal representation to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer