...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in Sandoval

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Victimized by a bicycle accident in Sandoval? Carlson Bier is an Illinois-based law firm specializing in personal injury cases, including unfortunate occurrences on two wheels. Our skilled attorneys are readily adept at navigating the complexities of Bicycle Accidents litigation; standing up against negligent parties and insurance companies that trivialize your trauma or injuries. As staunch advocates for cyclists’ rights, we understand how impactful these accidents can be on your life– from debilitating injuries to seemingly insurmountable medical expenses and loss of income during recovery. At Carlson Bier, our commitment extends beyond mere representation; we pledge undivided attention to each case while fostering relationships founded on empathy and respect with clients engulfed in such traumatic times. Our legal prowess coupled with unwavering dedication sets us apart, sealing our repute as the top choice when facing the aftermath of Bicycle Accidents. Securing rightful compensation becomes less daunting teamed alongside industry-leading experts from Carlson Bier riding forward towards justice together! Engage proven professionals today for seamless navigation through this predicament.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Sandoval Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the traumatic and life-altering impact bicycle accidents can bring. Being professional personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, it’s our mission to provide exceptional legal representation for victims navigating these challenging times. Knowledge is power, and understanding the specifics regarding bicycle accident claims is a significant part of making sound decisions during your personal injury litigation process.

In Illinois, bicycles are considered vehicles under traffic laws – consequently, cyclists have concrete rights on roadways. Coupled with this right comes responsibilities; obligations that each cyclist must heed to ensure not only their safety but that of others as well. Therefore, while cyclists are accorded protection by law against negligence from other road users such as drivers who may infringe upon their space or fail to yield when required to do so; they also should mind all applicable traffic regulations including stopping at stop signs and observing lane discipline among others. Failure to adhere can weaken an injury claim or even potentially implicate the cyclist as having contributed towards causing the accident.

Key factors often weighed during litigation involving bicycle accidents include:

– The extent of injury suffered: This helps gauge potential compensation amount.

– Property damage: Damages involving property such as bicycles could be recoverable.

– Lost income: If your ability to earn has been hampered by the accident, you’re entitled to recover compensatory damages.

– Medical expenses both present and future can be claimed.

When pursuing claims resulting from bike accidents in Illinois, important considerations exist around contributory negligence. Illinois operates under modified comparative negligence rules which stipulate that as long you were less than 50% responsible for the accident occurrence; you are eligible for compensation although it might be diminished proportionally depending on your contribution towards its cause.

Taking swift action following a bicycle accident exponentially boosts chances of securing rightful compensation swiftly. Gathering appropriate evidence immediately after an unfortunate occurrence significantly influences overall case outcome positively. Call authorities promptly and ensure comprehensive accident reports get filed accurately indicating every crucial detail concerning the accidents’ occurrence. Prompt medical attention should be sought regardless of whether injuries appear severe or not as symptoms could manifest later on.

Reach out to personal injury attorneys like Carlson Bier as we offer sturdy representation and walk with you every step to ensure good legal redress is secured. That said, it’s key to understand that building a compelling bicycle accident claim takes time; patience rather than rushing can result in a more comprehensive settlement package.

Our commitment at Carlson Bier involves ensuring clients are educated about their rights, equipping them with all relevant information enabling us together build up an insurmountable litigation strategy essential for optimizing potential compensation amounts. Engaging seasoned litigators such as ourselves significantly enhances your chance of fair restitution due to our vast experiences handling similar cases – we understand what it takes substantively & procedurally!

Interested in deciphering how much your case could potentially be worth? Unsure about critical steps vital for successful recovery following bicycle-related injuries? You’ve come SEVERAL steps further by seeking knowledge! While each case varies greatly based on individualized variables, we are here not just providing tangible solutions but also ready to fight tooth and nail advocating unwaveringly for rightful justice that replaces uncertainty and doubt with hope and assurance. Feel bolstered by giving yourself the best chance towards recovery subsequent from unfortunate bike accidents! Unveil the potential value lying underneath your claims by clicking the button below NOW: Submit Your Case Evaluation!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Sandoval Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Sandoval

Areas of Practice in Sandoval

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Extending professional legal help for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Healthcare Misconduct

Ensuring specialist legal services for clients affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Obligation

Taking on cases involving problematic products, providing skilled legal guidance to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Neglect

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Trip Incidents

Specialist in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking recovery for their losses.

Neonatal Injuries

Providing legal aid for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Mishaps: Dedicated to helping patients of car accidents gain appropriate compensation for harms and impairment.

Scooter Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Trucking Collision

Offering adept legal assistance for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for harms.

Building Site Mishaps

Committed to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Impairments

Committed to extending specialized legal support for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Dog Bite Harms

Proficient in managing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Undeserved Death

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and experienced legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spine Impairment

Expert in advocating for victims with vertebral damage, offering professional legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​