...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Sandoval

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to dog bite injuries, promptly securing legal representation can mean the difference between receiving fair compensation or not. Your ideal choice in such a scenario would be Carlson Bier, an Illinois-based law firm that specializes in personal injury cases like dog bites. With an enviable track record of gaining significant settlements for their clients, they’ve established themselves as trustworthy champions for victims’ rights statewide. Our attorneys at Carlson Bier comprehend the complex nuances involved in these types of accidents and provide effective strategies tailored specifically for each case while adhering strictly to Illinois laws. Whether your situation involves severe physical distress or emotional scars caused by a canine attack, trust our team’s experience and dedication to represent you professionally throughout the legal process from start to finish. We always prioritize client welfare over all else and work diligently seeking justice on your behalf with aggressive advocacy skills honed through years of practice in these matters To reach out about your Sandoval-area incident don’t hesitate – let Carlson Bier be your advocate today.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Sandoval Illinois

Dog bite incidents are traumatic events that can lead to serious physical injuries, psychological trauma, and significant medical bills. At Carlson Bier, our team of experienced personal injury attorneys understands the pain and suffering victims undergo after a dog bite attack, particularly in Illinois where such cases are frequent.

The complexities surrounding dog bite laws can be confusing for victims and their families. In Illinois, dog owners are held strictly liable for any harm their pet may cause. This means that even if the dog has never shown aggressive behavior or bitten anyone before, the owner is still accountable for injuries caused by their pet. It further implies that it’s not mandatory for you, as a victim, to prove negligence on the part of the pet owner.

A few key points about Illinois Dog Bite Laws include:

– Stricter Liability: The statute applies even if the owner was unaware of the dog’s propensity for violence.

– Unprovoked Attacks: The law covers instances where you did not provoke or antagonize the animal.

– Lawful Presence: You must have been legally allowed in the place where you got bitten.

It’s crucial to note each case is unique with its specifics around causation and damage due to a dog bite assault. Victims often face physical wounds, such as punctures, lacerations or scarring; suffer emotionally through post-traumatic stress disorder; encounter financial burdens including hefty medical bills & lost wages from time off work recovering from an incident which they didn’t bring upon themselves – all these factors help determine how much compensation one may receive following a successful claim.

Your rightful compensation might also cover intangible losses like pain and suffering or loss of enjoyment in life activities due to lasting effects of this terrible experience which includes fear around dogs going forward resultantly impacting your quality of life significantly. But getting this compensation isn’t always easy – many insurance companies attempt to mitigate payouts by downplaying damages or pointing out shared liabilities.

This is why it’s crucial to contact our experienced dog bite lawyers at Carlson Bier immediately following an incident. Our competitive team works tirelessly to ensure you are rightfully compensated for your physical injuries, psychological trauma, medical bills, loss of income and other collateral damages you didn’t anticipate when the dog attacked.

Our impeccable track record with personal injury lawsuits stands testament to our commitment – securing justice on behalf of victims by debunking several myths surrounding such incidents; Dogs don’t bite without reason; it was just playful nipping – Myths that often let guilty parties off the hook instead of holding them accountable.

Lastly, seek immediate legal counsel if you or anyone close has fallen prey to a canine attack. Not only does this facilitate faster investigation whilst evidence remains fresh but also better understanding of your rights & responsibilities under Illinois Dog Bite Law which can influence case outcomes significantly. For expert advice specifically tailored towards your unique circumstances be sure to reach out at Carlson Bier where compassion meets proficiency!

We encourage you not leave anything on table rather find out precisely what your claim is worth with our dedicated team promising complete transparency at each step. The road to recovery doesn’t have to seem long and lonely – allow us here at Carlson Bier lending helping hand as we strive in turning around traumatic experiences into effective resolutions creating lasting impact.

Looking forward to win favorable outcomes effectively while safeguarding victim’s best interests. Hardship borne tending physical wound or psychological trauma shouldn’t double up dealing wrongdoers furthered by insurance players prioritizing profits over people – Don’t settle until it’s right! Click on button below revealing rightful compensation awaiting you today!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Sandoval Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Sandoval

Areas of Practice in Sandoval

Cycling Collisions

Expert in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or unsafe conditions.

Flame Traumas

Supplying professional legal support for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Medical Malpractice

Offering expert legal services for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Fault

Dealing with cases involving defective products, delivering adept legal assistance to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Mistreatment

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Tumble Mishaps

Adept in handling trip accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking restitution for their suffering.

Infant Wounds

Providing legal aid for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Car Crashes

Crashes: Devoted to aiding clients of car accidents receive appropriate remuneration for hurts and damages.

Motorbike Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

18-Wheeler Crash

Delivering expert legal representation for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for hurts.

Construction Mishaps

Concentrated on defending employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Neurological Injuries

Specializing in offering specialized legal advice for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Damages

Skilled in tackling cases for victims who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Committed to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Demise

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and adept legal services to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Injury

Committed to supporting persons with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​