...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Saybrook

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in advocating for victims of dog bite injuries in Saybrook. This type of injury can have lasting impacts—both physical and emotional—and we understand the urgency to seek justice. Our team of dedicated personal injury lawyers has a proven track record success dealing with such cases, ensuring our clients receive maximum compensation available under Illinois law. We go beyond understanding case specifics; empathy is at the heart of our practice as we hurdle through this challenging time together with you—a unique approach that puts us ahead in field. Handling negotiations with tenacity and acuity, while navigating complex legal procedures adeptly are attributes resonating across all our client testimonials. Legal representation matters when it comes to Dog Bite Injuries proceedings—the expertise and dedication provided by Carlson Bier ensures your case receives meticulous attention from start to finish. Entrust your concerns to us: dependability, compassion wrapped up within legal excellence—that’s what sets up apart as seasoned attorneys.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Saybrook Illinois

Dog bite injuries, unfortunately, are common events that occur across communities. When dealing with the aftermath of such an unexpected and traumatic experience, engagement with a skilled personal injury attorney is crucial to navigate through the complexity of this legal matter. Our law firm, Carlson Bier, has extensive expertise in representing dog bite victims centered around Illinois.

Understanding Dog Bite Laws

The state laws governing dog bites vary widely from state to state. In most scenarios, handling these cases necessitates comprehensive knowledge about the specific laws and regulations applicable to your jurisdiction. In Illinois:

– The owners are held strictly liable for any harm or damage caused by their dogs.

– There’s no ‘free-bite rule,’ meaning responsibility is not only limited to dogs that have previously bitten someone.

– Proof need not be presented regarding the owner’s prior awareness about the dog’s aggressive behaviour.

Dog Bite Case Evidence Collection

Having strong evidence contributes significantly to building a robust legal case following a dog bite injury:

– Medical records showing emergency treatments, surgeries required post-injury as well as future treatment costs is critical.

– Photographs detailing physical injuries including stitches or scars can strengthen your claim.

– Detailed accounts from eye-witnesses who observed the incident can establish fault.

Carlson Bier Personal Injury Firm Service Clarity

At Carlson Bier law firm we have experienced attorneys specializing particularly in dog bite incidents based all across Illinois. Our services include but are not limited to:

– Legal consultation where we analyse and assess your claims while informing you upfront about potential outcomes of your case consultation

– Assistance in filing lawsuits and negotiating settlements

– Representing you during trials if necessary

We serve comprehensively throughout the State of Illinois with our variety network of partner offices ensuring every client gets premium legal support without compromise on proximity. Rest assured knowing wherever you’re located within our state limits, our dedicated team will provide professional representation aimed at obtaining fair compensation for medical bills, pain, suffering, emotional distress and other damages.

Here at Carlson Bier, proven expertise allows us to guide you through the exact steps needed to safeguard your rights and secure the maximum compensation possible for victims of dog bite injuries. While our seasoned attorneys lend their attention to legal matters, you can focus on recuperation knowing that a strong defense is being built around your case.

Dog Bite Victim Guarantee

As part of an unlimited free consultation offer we provide potential clients with the opportunity to discuss their cases without obligation or charge. This preliminary consultation examines each detail specific to your situation ensuring that your needs are effectively met by our tailor-made litigation strategy.

We operate under a ‘No Win-No Fee’ policy which simply translates into – A guarantee of zero client fees unless we win the case for you. Our motivation remains aligned with yours whilst allowing us financial accountability for resolving your suit successfully.

Thus, do not be constrained by fear or misinformation about pursuing legal justice in cases like these merely because it feels complex or intimidating. Our dynamic team at Carlson Bier has earned a reputation in Illinois for successful representation and just compensation awards transforming countless lives while raising awareness about such grave issues.

It is crucially important to remember- Should you find yourself unas sure victim; consult legal professionals immediately post-incident with all available information about what transpired as well as any photographic evidence obtained. Act swiftly; time limitations apply on filing claims and a delayed response may hinder chances towards winning rightful settlements.

Proceed further only after informed decision-making: Click on the button below now! Get immediate access giving clear insight into how much monetary recovery could potentially be due from your unique circumstances.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Saybrook Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Saybrook

Areas of Practice in Saybrook

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's negligence or perilous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Providing professional legal services for patients of grave burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Hospital Misconduct

Offering specialist legal representation for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Responsibility

Managing cases involving dangerous products, extending adept legal support to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Misconduct

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Slip Occurrences

Specialist in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking redress for their injuries.

Newborn Wounds

Extending legal support for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Accidents: Dedicated to supporting victims of car accidents obtain fair settlement for injuries and losses.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in providing legal advice for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Trucking Accident

Ensuring experienced legal support for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for damages.

Building Site Mishaps

Committed to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cerebral Damages

Focused on ensuring expert legal support for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Harms

Specialized in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Passing

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and experienced legal support to ensure fairness.

Backbone Injury

Specializing in defending victims with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​