Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Schaumburg

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve been a victim of a slip and fall accident, Carlson Bier is here to represent your legal rights with tenacity and expertise. As an esteemed Illinois law firm specializing in personal injury claims, we dedicate ourselves to provide reliable support for residents who face unexpected misfortunes such as these accidents. Our team profoundly understands the statutes surrounding slip-and-fall accidents; they are well-versed on how to pursue just compensation. We help clients gather requisite evidence demonstrating negligence leading to injuries while negotiating skillfully with insurers or arguing powerfully before judges and juries if necessary. The wealth of knowledge our team harbors regarding Illinois’ complex laws, compiled over years of skilled practice, positions us deftly within the arena of personal injury lawyers available for consultation within Schaumburg’s vicinity. Trust that when considering Carlson Bier for representation in any personal injury matter – particularly involving slip-and-fall incidents – you opt for staunch advocacy relentlessly focused on securing your deserved restitution.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Schaumburg Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we commit ourselves to facilitate a smooth process for you in the wake of slip and fall accidents. We understand that these incidents could occur unexpectedly, resulting in severe physical injuries and financial distress. With a wealth of experience under our belt practicing tort law within Illinois, we strive to provide excellent legal services with empathy and unwavering focus.

Slip and fall accidents can have devastating consequences due to trauma to the head, back or broken bones. At the heart of such cases is the principle centered around premises liability – which holds property owners accountable for maintaining safe conditions. According to this principle, if an accident occurs due to substandard conditions on someone else’s property culminating in injuries – there may be grounds for raising a legal claim.

Highlighted below are key premises where common slip and fall accidents occur:

• Retail stores

• Private homes

• Restaurants

• Parking lots

• Office buildings

To establish accountability in such misfortunate events requires proving negligence on part of the property proprietor- which is precisely where professional assistance from seasoned attorneys like us at Carlson Bier becomes invaluable. By meticulously combing through every record and piece of evidence pertinent to your case – we aspire to build compelling arguments helping you confront ambitious insurance companies successfully while holding wrongdoers accountable for their blatant disregard towards safety measures.

Critically though, not just any condition will suffice as evidence supporting your claim under Illinois’ Premises Liability Act; it has certain requirements related chiefly to “open-and-obvious” doctrine stating landowners aren’t generally liable for harms from visibly clear dangers as people should take reasonable steps avoiding those themselves. Other necessary ingredients include substantiating that:

• Identified danger wasn’t distinctly obvious.

• Defendant failed demonstrating reasonable efforts rectifying or warning about potential risks.

Additionally important is the boundedness by Statute-of-Limitations clock ticking from accident instant – generally two years within Illinois before recovery rights become voided; thus, it’s recommended to seek legal counsel rapidly after such incidents.

In accordance with Illinois law, we serve our clients from our strategically placed locations throughout the state. While maintaining strong ties with local jurisdictions and abiding by legal framework explicitly disallows advertising presence in cities where a physical office doesn’t exist – our reach is entrustingly wide.

As your chosen advocates at Carlson Bier, we aspire to dissect complexities bearing on slip and fall injuries elucidating potential actionable routes for you while demonstrating noteworthy attributes setting us apart into two broad layers – Hard Skills and Soft Skills (empathy & responsiveness predominantly). Our promise includes providing:

• Quality service through comprehensive knowledge about relevant statutory frameworks.

• Exception markers citing transparency, ethicality, communication and competence.

• Personalized approach towards every case focusing on individual circumstance-details.

Each crucial tick represents our unwavering pledge delivering justice deservedly while compensating for afflictions endured which extends well beyond tangible financial reparations reaching intangible domains of psychological reassurance gained through rightful entitlement restoration.

Are you seeking rightful compensation? It’s important to remember that time is of the essence when it comes to protecting your rights following a slip and fall accident. Don’t hesitate to get started with your claim. We cordially invite you here at Carlson Bier- where an adept team patiently awaits understanding your ordeal fully while formulating apt solutions tailored individually helping ease out distress levels suffered. Merely click the button below for an immediate evaluation so we can begin working expeditiously determining just how much your case could actually be worth! Let us guide you through this arduous journey cleansing clouds of uncertainties hovering under handpicked expertise-sunshine bringing clarity along redemption roads.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Schaumburg Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Schaumburg

Areas of Practice in Schaumburg

Bicycle Crashes

Focused on legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Burns

Offering expert legal advice for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Medical Malpractice

Offering specialist legal representation for persons affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Fault

Handling cases involving unsafe products, extending specialist legal assistance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Misconduct

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Fall & Stumble Accidents

Expert in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking recovery for their harm.

Newborn Traumas

Extending legal aid for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Collisions

Accidents: Dedicated to helping patients of car accidents gain just recompense for hurts and impairment.

Motorcycle Crashes

Dedicated to providing representation for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

18-Wheeler Accident

Ensuring specialist legal services for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for hurts.

Worksite Accidents

Engaged in defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Head Traumas

Focused on offering compassionate legal support for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Expertise in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered damages from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Expert in legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Passing

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and expert legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Neural Impairment

Expert in advocating for persons with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer