...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Car Accident Attorney in Schiller Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re involved in an auto accident in Schiller Park, contacting Carlson Bier should be your immediate course of action. Why? They offer invaluable legal expertise to advocate for your claim effectively. As reputed Personal Injury Lawyers based in Illinois, they specialize in car accident cases and bring a thorough understanding of the state laws and insurance procedures. Their reputation for favorable verdicts speaks volumes about their diligence and commitment towards clients dealing with distressing situations like vehicle accidents. Be it negligent drivers or complex roadside conditions; they scrutinize every detail that strengthens your case while ensuring open communication throughout the process. Their proficient strategy makes them excel among law firms handling matters pertaining to car accidents across Schiller Park’s jurisdictional limits without being physically present there. Entrusting Carlson Bier with your case guarantees you access to experienced attorneys who are relentless advocates for rightful compensations.And rightfully so,they believe each client deserves personalized attention,a stress-free legal journey,and balances justice.Successfully serving individuals distressed by automobile mishaps,makes choosing Carlson Bier synonymous with asserting rights.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Car Accident Lawyers in Schiller Park Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted personal injury attorney group in Illinois. Our team comprises experienced legal professionals who specialize in representing victims of car accidents and we take great pride in our strong track record of success.

Car accidents are traumatic experiences that can dramatically change the course of an individual’s life. At Carlson Bier, we understand firsthand how these incidents can cause physical pain, emotional distress, and financial hardship. That’s why we offer dedicated and robust support to victims by effectively navigating through complex laws, dealing with insurance companies, and ensuring maximum compensation for injuries sustained.

Understanding car accident laws is crucial when seeking justice for personal injury cases. The State of Illinois operates under a tort system where a negligent driver must bear the expenses associated with the accident they caused. It also employs contributory fault rules which implies that even if you share some blame for the accident, you could still be eligible for damages provided your level of fault does not exceed 50%.

The pivotal factors involved in determining liability include:

• Evidence at the scene: This includes photos or video footage from nearby surveillance cameras.

• Witness testimony: Statements from bystanders can play a significant role.

• Police reports: Official records provide an unbiased account of events that transpired.

• Physical evidence: Skid marks, vehicle damage etc., help reconstruct how an incident occurred.

In order to make a successful claim after a car accident in Illinois, it is crucial to prove negligence on part of the other driver involved. In legal terms, negligence refers to any type of conduct that falls below expected standards laid down by law for protection against unreasonable risk or harm.

There are four main points necessary to establish negligence:

1) Duty: Showing that the defendant (person being sued) owed a duty towards plaintiff (person suing).

2) Breach: Demonstrating that this duty was breached.

3) Causation: Proof asserting causal link between defendant’s breach and injury/suffered by the plaintiff.

4) Damages: Evidence of actual injury or loss.

Recovery from a car accident is more than just physical—it encompasses your mental wellbeing, financial stability and quality of life. For this reason, it’s important to have aggressive representation at every step. From medical bills and lost wages to future treatment costs and emotional distress—every aspect must be taken into account when we negotiate compensation on your behalf.

The time immediately following a car accident can be overwhelming but it’s critical not to miss out on recovering due compensation. In Illinois, you generally have two years from the date of the accident to bring about a personal injury lawsuit.

We invite you to leverage our experience and dedication in handling such cases. At Carlson Bier, no case is too large or too small – we view each as unique and deserving of personalized attention. Our aim is not only to help you recover financially, but also ensure smoother transition back into day-to-day life post-recovery.

You deserve justice for what you’ve been through—and that starts with understanding what your case might truly be worth in real dollar terms. We encourage you towards the first step of this journey by clicking on the button below – find out how much your case could potentially be valued at right away.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Schiller Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Car Accident FAQ​

The most common causes of car accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause drivers to lose control of their vehicles.
  • Vehicle defects: Defective vehicles can cause accidents in a variety of ways.
  • Weather conditions: Rain, snow, and ice can make roads slick and dangerous.

If you are involved in a car accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

    Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle.

    Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Schiller Park

Areas of Practice in Schiller Park

Bicycle Mishaps

Expert in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Fire Damages

Providing expert legal assistance for victims of major burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Medical Misconduct

Providing dedicated legal representation for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Liability

Taking on cases involving defective products, supplying adept legal guidance to victims affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Abuse

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Slip Injuries

Adept in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking justice for their losses.

Newborn Harms

Providing legal support for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Incidents

Crashes: Focused on helping sufferers of car accidents receive fair compensation for harms and damages.

Bike Incidents

Expert in providing legal services for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Semi Crash

Ensuring expert legal assistance for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for harms.

Construction Incidents

Dedicated to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Neurological Harms

Focused on ensuring expert legal representation for victims suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Damages

Skilled in dealing with cases for people who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Jogger Mishaps

Committed to legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Fatality

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and skilled legal representation to ensure redress.

Backbone Harm

Specializing in supporting persons with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​