FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Seneca

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking recompense for dog bite injuries, Carlson Bier is your quintessential choice for legal representation in the Seneca region. This Illinois-based personal injury lawyer group carries an impressive track record of securing favorable verdicts and settlements on behalf of their clients, effectively addressing all complexities unique to dog bite incidents. Harnessing deep understanding of Illinois’ injury laws and dog owner responsibilities, they employ comprehensive strategies designed entirely around every individual case’s nuances. Their commitment goes beyond mere legal advice; they provide unparallel assistance through insurance negotiations and court proceedings if required. Focusing on maximizing recovery while reducing stress associated with these traumatic experiences makes Carlson Bier stand out amidst peers – catering to residents faced with similar unfortunate events across this landscape without implying a physical presence within it! With them by your side,receive quality consultation and robust representation ensuring justice rightly served – making Carlson Bier the right voice advocating for you!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Seneca Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, a distinguished personal injury law firm in the state of Illinois. We specialize in various facets of personal injury law, one such area being dog bite injuries. A seemingly common mishap can cause serious repercussions for an individual’s physical and psychological well-being. With our dedicated team of well-versed attorneys, we aim to educate and assist every person who has suffered from a dog bite incident.

A dog bite might just not be a simple wound; it encompasses everything from minor scratches and punctures to significant injuries leading to nerve damage or severe infections like rabies and tetanus. Emotional trauma is another profound impact often underestimated, affecting people long-term with their interaction with dogs or just leaving the house.

At Carlson Bier, we believe knowledge empowers individuals asserting their rights and seeking justice. Here are some crucial points related to dog bites everyone must be aware:

– Under Illinois’ strict liability laws, dog owners can be held legally responsible if their pet injures someone else.

– Even if a dog owner wasn’t negligent or didn’t know the dog could be harmful, they would still generally be liable.

The extent of your injuries after a traumatic event like a vicious dog attack directly impacts the compensation you’re eligible for under these statutes:

– The cost of medical treatment and any required rehabilitation due to a debilitating animal attack

– Lost wages

In addition to these tangible costs:

– Pain & Suffering – The physical discomfort associated with your injuries as well as emotional distress

Moreover:

– You have legal recourse even if it was the first time that the canine attacked anyone

Working through all these complexities necessitates skillful guidance on navigating Illinois Legislation concerning Dog Bite Injuries — this is where our expert attorneys step in.

Ensuring you receive fair representation following an unfortunate animal attack requires additional specific considerations regarding building your case:

– Documenting the nature of the attack, via photographs whenever possible

– Recording witness accounts, if there were any present during the event

– Procuring medical records proving that the canine assault indeed caused your injuries

Our experienced team at Carlson Bier is trained to handle these intricacies professionally. We work tenaciously toward building a strong case by gathering all the necessary evidence to reflect not just the physical but also the emotional aspect of your ordeal.

Remember, you do not have to face these legal proceedings alone — let us spearhead your cause while you focus on recovery. It’s essential to note that though we operate within the Illinois jurisdiction, we adhere strictly to Illinois law and ethics stating only attorneys with a physical office in any city can claim representation there; we stand behind this code unflinchingly.

We’ve been advocating rights and winning compensation for clients throughout our history — pledging unwavering support in difficult times when individuals are most vulnerable following dog bite injuries. Our expert team uses its solid understanding of Illinois’ intricate statutory regulations backed by years of litigation experience involving unique situations like yours – because every case brings unique considerations and implications.

Navigating all this information can be overwhelming right after experiencing such an unfortunate incident. Let us help you decipher these details relevant to your situation. Below is an interactive, easy-to-use feature designed specifically for our valued website visitors like yourself: Click on the button below, share some quick basic inputs about your case, and find out what it could potentially be worth. Remember that every single detail counts when dealing with personal injury cases related directly or indirectly with animal attacks under Illinois Law—which makes our role as skilled solicitors supporting you even more critical toward achieving justice for you!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Seneca Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Seneca

Areas of Practice in Seneca

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Fire Wounds

Extending specialist legal support for patients of major burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Ensuring dedicated legal services for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Accountability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, delivering specialist legal services to clients affected by defective items.

Senior Malpractice

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble & Fall Accidents

Adept in dealing with trip accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking compensation for their damages.

Birth Injuries

Supplying legal guidance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Incidents: Focused on assisting victims of car accidents obtain equitable payout for harms and impairment.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Expert in providing representation for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Trucking Incident

Providing adept legal assistance for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for losses.

Construction Collisions

Concentrated on advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Brain Impairments

Expert in delivering dedicated legal support for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Harms

Expertise in tackling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Wrongful Loss

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and skilled legal support to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Harm

Focused on assisting persons with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440