FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Seneca

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the unfortunate predicament of a Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), it’s critical to make judicious choices for your future. One such crucial decision is selecting legal representation that truly encapsulates expertise, empathy and experience in handling SCI cases – this is where Carlson Bier comes into play. Based in Illinois, our law firm boasts an impressive record defending the rights of SCI victims seeking justice and adequate compensation. Our team understands that every case is unique; hence we provide tailored solutions to meet each client’s needs as they navigate through their recovery journey and the complex lawsuit process. The unmatched proficiency of our attorneys verifies that Carlson Bier stands at the forefront when dealing with SCI matters. With extensive knowledge about medical costs, rehabilitation procedures, potential loss of income & hidden costs linked to these injuries–combined with robust negotiation skills–Carlson Bier assures your best interests will be safeguarded tenaciously as we help you secure rightful compensation. Trust us— choosing Carlson Bier equals peace of mind in troublesome times.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Seneca Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we strive to be at the forefront of legal assistance in the state of Illinois when it comes to personal injury. Specializing in a wide array of personal injury cases, with particular focus on spinal cord injuries – our mission is nothing short of ensuring that you get unstinted justice.

First and foremost, it has been essential for us to ensure comprehensive assimilation and dissemination of knowledge about the seriousness and scope of spinal cord injuries among our audience. Typically involving damage to any section within one’s spinal cord, such injuries manifest themselves in different ways based on their severity level. Some might experience numbness or partial immobilization while more severe cases can lead to complete paralysis.

• Spinal Cord Injury: Deep dive into its severity- Minor damages could trigger changes like an increased tendency towards exhaustion or spasms whereas severe injuries might result in debilitating paralysis.

• Cause Analysis: Most often these injuries stem from unfortunate incidents like motor vehicle accidents, falls, or sports activities. However instances arising from violent events including gunshot wounds are by no means uncommon.

Being familiarized with this information enables victims or their loved ones not only interpret medical terminologies and implications but also facilitates communication with doctors thereby fostering an environment conducive for healing after such a traumatic incident. Besides this baseline knowledge it is important each case is scrutinized minutely given its unique elements which largely influence the subsequent legal claims process.

• Damage Assessment: This involves understanding how bad the damage is as well as how it impacts daily living (both present & future). Aspects include not just physical disability but potential psychological harm too.

• Legal Implications: Determining negligence becomes fundamental because if your injury was caused by someone else’s negligent act then they must answer legally.

To navigate through these complexities with ease what better partner than Carlson Bier – your allies who bring decades worth expertise borne off diligently serving hundreds suffering spinal cord injury? Our attorneys will look closely into every nuance of your case treating you not just as another client but as an individual in need, distraught by unanticipated events who deserves justice.

Setting us apart from many contemporaries is the threshold that we set for our performance. We don’t deem our mission accomplished merely by providing legal assistance; no, we believe in digging deeper addressing collateral issues like guidance on medical options or financial aid – all aiming to ensure recovery isn’t just about restoring physical health but strengthening spirits too thereby veering life back onto its track.

Our personalized approach moulded by robust experience assures you an understanding and empathetic guide leading to a fair courtroom verdict. A testimony to this are countless success stories where clients emerged out of their challenging times stronger than ever before- finding closure & justice served in tandem.

Trust Carlson Bier, when it comes to serving forth a comprehensive package crafted meticulously addressing spinal cord injury cases including impact assessment up till resolution in Illinois courts. Both comprehensive assistance and bedrock expertise delivered seamlessly – that’s Carlson Bier for you!

Why do victims worldwide trust us? Because we deliver value through authentic empathy backed by solid knowledge without shying away from going an extra mile when needed– believing firmly each one has every right over fair compensation!

Take that initial step towards claiming what’s rightfully yours. Let our seasoned attorneys guide you through complexities involved optimally leveraging their extensive exposure catering people suffering such distressful injuries across various walks of life originating via different incidents from motor vehicle collision to sporting mishaps.

Do not let apprehensions undermine your journey seeking justice compounded with worries about monetary obligations inherent in retaining legal teams. In fact, click on the button below now and accrue insights on what could be potential worth of your case hence making intelligible decisions rooted off relevant metrics way ahead initiation proceedings itself!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Seneca Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Seneca

Areas of Practice in Seneca

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Proficient in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Supplying skilled legal support for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Ensuring expert legal services for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Obligation

Addressing cases involving faulty products, extending specialist legal guidance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Elder Misconduct

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall and Trip Accidents

Skilled in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking justice for their damages.

Infant Wounds

Extending legal assistance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Collisions

Collisions: Concentrated on aiding patients of car accidents receive fair payout for injuries and damages.

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

18-Wheeler Accident

Providing specialist legal assistance for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for hurts.

Worksite Crashes

Dedicated to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Brain Injuries

Focused on delivering professional legal representation for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Injuries

Skilled in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Expert in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unfair Death

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and expert legal guidance to ensure redress.

Backbone Damage

Committed to representing individuals with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440