FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Serena

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve been affected by a pedestrian accident, quality legal representation is crucial, and Carlson Bier fits the bill perfectly. Renowned in Illinois for unwavering commitment to clients’ rights, our adept team has a proven record of obtaining significant recoveries in stringent pedestrian accident cases. The firm’s attorneys are industry leaders who have won substantial settlements and verdicts throughout their years of practice.

Navigating through personal injury laws related to pedestrian accidents could be complex; hence at Carlson Bier, we guide victims compassionately towards justice. We employ exhaustive investigation strategies tailoring them uniquely for each case maximizing compensation owed for pain and suffering or any loss suffered.

Our skills engulf knowledge beyond law books as we’re well-versed with intricate insurance policies ensuring claims aren’t undervalued nor denied unjustly. Our client-centric approach includes prompt communication keeping clients informed about their case progress without delay.

Choosing Carlson Bier guarantees diligent legal advocacy utilizing strategic negotiation techniques tailored to navigate your claim effectively within Illinois jurisdiction irrespective of where exactly the incident transpired. Entrust your personal injury claim with us today; because at Carlson Bier, you matter more than just another case number.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Serena Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are passionate about protecting the rights and interests of individuals who have sustained injuries through pedestrian-related accidents. Our law firm, based in Illinois, is comprised of dedicated personal injury attorneys with extensive experience in dealing with a range of injuries that tend to result from such incidents.

If you or a loved one has been injured due to another party’s negligence while out walking, it’s imperative to understand your legal rights and options. Pedestrian accidents can result in severe physical damage and emotional trauma that affect not only victims but their family members as well. This significant impact often extends from immediate medical expenses to long-term care needs and rehabilitation costs.

Navigating through the complex world of personal injury claims after such experiences can be daunting. Here’s where Carlson Bier comes into play – providing aggressive representation on your behalf so you can focus fully on your recovery. We have years of experience dealing with insurance adjusters as we fight for maximum compensation operations.

Key aspects that our lawyers explore during case assessment include:

– Determining fault: Were you crossing at an appropriate place? Was the motorist obeying traffic laws?

– Potential sources of compensation: Does liability lie mainly with the driver involved in the accident? Could local authorities also bear some responsibility for poor infrastructure?

– Recurring negligent practices like distracted driving, impaired driving or speeding.

Pedestrian cases represent more than just mere collisions between individuals and cars; they encompass bicycle-pedestrian accidents, public transportation-related mishaps, unmarked crosswalk incidents among others. At Carlson Bier our attorneys comprehend these variables fully offering personalized attention throughout every step in pursuing your claim.

We realize that each case presents unique circumstances hence thorough investigation methods are applied utilizing different strategies relevant for each situation – whether it is engaging accident reconstructionists when necessary or reviewing CCTV footage when available.

On financial grounds, many may fear to seek legal help assuming hiring a lawyer may drain them of their resources. With Carlson Bier, your concerns will be put at ease as we operate on a contingency fee basis. This means you only pay for our services when and if you win your case – this ensures that those impacted by pedestrian accidents can afford the expert legal assistance they require and deserve.

We believe it’s essential to understand the process involved in making personal injury claims to uphold a fair settlement. Filing within stipulations set by Illinois’ Statute of Limitation law, understanding comparative negligence policies relevant to your case, crucial documentation for evidence like medical reports – Carlson Bier’s team is committed to enlighten you about these multifaceted phases.

It entails more than just arming yourself with knowledge but gives rise to advocacy capacity so no insurer or opposing party can exploit you due to ignorance. Give yourself and loved ones peace by ensuring justice prevails after unfortunate experiences; let our diligent attorneys represent and guide you in demanding accountability from liable parties.

At Carlson Bier, we care deeply about imparting valuable educational content regarding pedestrian accident matters; putting them into perspective concerning prevalent laws in Illinois state while further illustrating how these bonds with people’s everyday life situations.

Simply put, the team at Carlson Bier has one primary goal: You own an inherent right for damage compensation when injured due to someone else’s lackadaisical behavior; we are here, equipped with expertise and relentless zeal for enforcing this right till justice prevails.

Please do not hesitate in reaching out for help under distressful aftermaths following pedestrian injuries inflicted upon innocent parties. Click on the button below now so that our experienced lawyers can initiate accurate consultation assessing what your potential claim could be worth based on conducted analysis pertinent specifics surrounding your unique circumstance.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Serena Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Serena

Areas of Practice in Serena

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Expert in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Supplying skilled legal help for people of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Clinical Malpractice

Providing specialist legal services for victims affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Obligation

Handling cases involving faulty products, extending skilled legal help to victims affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Malpractice

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Stumble Accidents

Expert in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking compensation for their damages.

Neonatal Traumas

Providing legal guidance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Collisions: Focused on guiding clients of car accidents receive equitable recompense for injuries and harm.

Scooter Collisions

Expert in providing representation for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Big Rig Incident

Ensuring professional legal services for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for injuries.

Building Mishaps

Engaged in representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cerebral Injuries

Expert in providing compassionate legal support for patients suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Injuries

Skilled in tackling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Expert in legal assistance for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unfair Demise

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and adept legal support to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Harm

Specializing in representing patients with vertebral damage, offering professional legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440