...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Sesser

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking support for medical malpractice issues in Sesser, Carlson Bier is the go-to law firm. With a profound understanding of Illinois’ Medical Malpractice laws, our team stands among the best to handle your legal needs. Expert litigation skills and years of experience in representing clients against healthcare providers set us apart from others; we are relentless in pursuing justice on your behalf. At Carlson Bier, we work diligently to investigate every aspect of each case, with a clear focus on maximizing compensation for damages you’ve suffered due to negligence or carelessness by health professionals. Our attorneys are skilled at deciphering complexities that may surround medical malpractice cases while fighting tirelessly to protect patient rights under state laws. We believe that every individual deserves top-notch legal representation when their life has been affected by medical negligence or error – this belief fuels our commitment towards ensuring fair treatment for all prospective clients. Feel free to contact Carlson Bier today – Your optimal choice whenever you need assistance with Medical Malpractice law-related matters.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Sesser Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our seasoned team of personal injury attorneys stand as vigilant advocates for victims grappling with the consequences of medical malpractice in Illinois. Medical malpractice is not merely an error; it is a breach of trust that can cause irreparable harm to patients and their families. Knowledge plays an essential role in empowering potential clients to assert their rights and understand the litigation process.

Medical malpractice cases often materialize from situations where healthcare providers neglect established protocols or deviate from a standard care level, culminating in avoidable injury or harm to the patient. The litmus test for discerning malpractice rests on two foundational principles:

• A violation of standard care – We entrust medical professionals with our health because they possess specialized knowledge and skills. When these professionals fail to execute this duty, causing harm due verdict negligence, this act translates into violating a ‘standard care’.

• An injury was caused by negligence – It isn’t sufficient that doctor made some mistakes. To have a case, the patient must prove that an injury occurred due to the healthcare professional’s negligence had significant damaging impact.

Comprehending your legal rights and understanding when medical negligence has occurred poses significant hurdles for most individuals; Carlson Bier helps you navigate this complex journey. Our team of experts meticulously examines all medical records, consults relevant medical experts and catalogues evidence to build a robust case aimed at achieving maximum compensation for our clients.

Medical malpractice manifests itself under various guises such as birth injuries, surgical errors or misdiagnosis amongst other forms. Irrespective of any form it takes, it can inflict grievous bodily harm and trauma compounded by monetary burdens down spiraling mental health condition

It’s important also note scenarios when filing for medical malpractice may diffidently not be feasible:

• Unhappy with treatment results – If you’re dissatisfied or unhappier with how your treatment unfolded,this doesn’t necessarily qualify as grounds form lawsuit. Doctors are implement perfect, and some scenarios outcomes can be unfavorable.

• Absence of injury – Even if doctor doesn’t comply with requisite standards but no harm comes to you as consequence, then any exposes cost f litigation wouldn’t justified by potential pay-off garnered from such a case.

Carlson Bier is recognized for our commitment to conscious, unwavering advocacy for medical malpractice victims across Illinois. We recognize the physical, emotional, and financial burdens that fall upon victims of medical malpractice and convert this understanding into zealous representation for justice. Furthermore, we operate based on contingency; thus, fees apply only when we win your case.

Our attorneys will empower you through comprehensive legal counsel – arming you with information about statutory timelines essential in a lawsuit termed ‘statute of limitations’, as well as explaining the process of obtaining suing professional’s testimony which becomes vital part proving negligence leading up resolution favoring victim client adequately compensated personal injury caused travesty misdiagnosis surgical mishap

Medical malpractice claims require expertise and tenacity—two traits that Carlson Bier lawyers embody in every case they handle.With us your rights always round- coated armor resilient strongest blows posed by intricacies complexities inherent navigating farce represented daunting labyrinth case settlement battles

An informed client his own best advocate hence look no further benefit considerate guidance support offered Carlson Bier team helping take back control situation gain deserved compensation restitution while incessantly guarding diligently pursuing interest ensuring justice served-it’s pledge solid decades’ long success establish reputation skills committed serving deserving clients together carve rise beyond despair brought medical shortcomings shake core trusting relationship professionals who vowed safeguard health

We invite you to discover how much your claim might be worth. With a few quick details provided via clicking the button below,you can find out what kind of settlement may be within your reach! No chase too big or small – trust us at Carlson Bier to guide you towards claiming justice that has been long due! Act now, and leverage our expertise to help catalyze your journey towards compensation and closure.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Sesser Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Sesser

Areas of Practice in Sesser

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Dedicated to legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Burn Burns

Supplying skilled legal advice for victims of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Medical Misconduct

Delivering dedicated legal support for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Liability

Addressing cases involving faulty products, extending expert legal support to clients affected by defective items.

Elder Malpractice

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Stumble Occurrences

Specialist in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking justice for their damages.

Childbirth Damages

Supplying legal aid for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Car Collisions

Crashes: Focused on supporting sufferers of car accidents obtain equitable remuneration for harms and harm.

Scooter Incidents

Expert in providing legal assistance for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

18-Wheeler Incident

Ensuring expert legal assistance for persons involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for hurts.

Worksite Incidents

Engaged in representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Brain Traumas

Expert in delivering dedicated legal assistance for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Injuries

Expertise in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Incidents

Committed to legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unjust Fatality

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and expert legal services to ensure restitution.

Neural Impairment

Expert in defending individuals with paralysis, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​