...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Shabbona

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has suffered dog bite injuries in Shabbona, the exceptional team at Carlson Bier is here to offer trusted and compassionate legal representation. Thriving under Illinois law dynamics, we’ve successfully achieved significant compensation for countless dog bite victims throughout our illustrious career. Our staunch pursuit of fair recompense for our clients has fortified a stellar reputation that resonates with countless grateful clients. Standing firmly on the twin pillars of expertise and commitment, Carlson Bier brings to table unparalleled case-handling skills coupled with personalized attention to all dog-bite related cases. We delve deep into investigating every facet of each incident meticulously; identifying liable parties, assessing animal control regulation breaches, negligence or owner irresponsibility – ultimately translating these findings into cogent arguments in court aimed at securing maximum settlements for our deserving clientele. Trusting Carlson Bier’s unsurpassed acumen gives you an enhanced edge in turning your harrowing ordeal towards justice deserved!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Shabbona Illinois

At Carlson Bier, a leading Illinois-based personal injury law firm, we dominate the legal landscape as proficient handlers of diverse injury claims. Specializing in personal injury lawsuits, particularly dog bite injuries, our seasoned attorneys navigate the nitty-gritty to secure the rightful compensation for our clients. Dog bites can result in not only physical injuries but also trauma – emotional and psychological – impairing your daily performances. Certain breeds might be stereotyped as aggressive or violent; however, any breed is capable of causing harm under different circumstances.

Let your first step following a dog bite incident be prompt medical care even when it seems superficial; seeking immediate healthcare ensures effective treatment and documentation of the severity of your injury. Acquiring comprehensive knowledge about Land of Lincoln’s dog bite laws would help expedite your quest for justice when you’ve been bitten by a domesticated canine.

Provisions from the Illinois Animal Control Act declare that pet owners face unambiguous liability should their pet inflict harm upon another person without provocation. This implies that as long as you didn’t trigger or incite the attack while on public grounds or lawfully on private property (including the dog owner’s own space), then you are entitled to pursuing damages.

To build a strong case against negligent pet owners, it helps to understand vital components involved:

– Obtain witness accounts: Statements from persons present at the scene provide credible insight into how events unfolded.

– Record pertinent details: Capture images if possible and jot down notes regarding the situation preceding and following the incident.

– Identify witnesses: Names and contact information could prove valuable during litigation.

– Report promptly: Notify proper authorities including local animal control and police.

Armed with this evidence coupled with keen insights derived from thousands of successful cases fought over many years, our adept lawyers offer unparalleled assistance throughout these proceedings. We meticulously prepare every case to expose culpability resulting in maximum recovery.

Dog Bite Injuries encompass physical scars to mental trauma such as fear, anxiety, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Also, the ongoing medical expenses to cope with sustaining such attacks can mount up creating unwarranted financial burdens. Therefore, understanding what damages to claim is of essence.

Common compensatory claims include:

– Medical Costs: For any treatments pertinent to the dog bite including surgeries and psychological counseling.

– Lost Wages: Compensate for income lost during incapacitation or periods spent in recovery away from work.

– Permanent Disfigurement/Scarring: Where severe dog bites alter your physical appearance detrimentally causing psychological impacts.

– Pain and Suffering: To offset emotional distresses experienced post-attack.

At Carlson Bier, our profound knowledge of Illinois’s civil law guarantees that your case benefits from a highly tailored legal strategy securing maximum settlement possible. We understand that healing takes precedence; thus our approach is programmed to demand minimal client involvement freeing you to focus more on rehabilitation while we champion your cause relentlessly.

Navigating through the aftermath of a traumatic dog bite incident can be a daunting task; but not when an accomplished advocate like Carlson Bier stands firmly beside you protecting your rights every step of the way. With us in your corner, you’ll leverage high level legal representation meticulously packaged with empathy and personalized attention working towards an ideal outcome for your circumstance

Your journey toward justice doesn’t have to be stressful. Access comprehensive guidance about probable recoveries given past experiences handling similar cases today! Uncover exactly how much value lies within your unique scenario by hitting the button below now! Remember at Carlson Bier those bitten are never forgotten – our mission is delivering rightful compensation fitting each client’s individual circumstances promptly. Let’s unveil justice together!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Shabbona Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Shabbona

Areas of Practice in Shabbona

Cycling Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Fire Traumas

Supplying expert legal assistance for patients of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Providing dedicated legal assistance for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Obligation

Managing cases involving unsafe products, extending skilled legal services to individuals affected by harmful products.

Senior Neglect

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Slip Occurrences

Expert in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking recovery for their suffering.

Neonatal Injuries

Delivering legal aid for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Collisions: Concentrated on aiding sufferers of car accidents secure reasonable remuneration for hurts and impairment.

Bike Incidents

Committed to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Truck Collision

Delivering expert legal support for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Dedicated to representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Cerebral Damages

Expert in offering expert legal assistance for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Damages

Adept at managing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Specializing in legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unjust Demise

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and experienced legal services to ensure compensation.

Spine Injury

Expert in representing clients with spine impairments, offering expert legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​